Edgar Filing: US BIODEFENSE INC

ubde10-ksba320051130amended2.htm -- Converted by SEC Publisher, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

<R>Amendment No. 2
to
Form 10-KSB</R>

[X]	Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

	For the Fiscal Year Ended November 30, 2005

[ ]	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

	For the Transition Period from	to

Commission File Number 000-31431

US BIODEFENSE, INC.
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)

	Utah	33-0052057
	(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or	(I.R.S. employer identification number)
	organization)

	13674 E. Valley Blvd.	91746
	City of Industry, CA
	(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip code)

Issuer’s telephone number: (626) 961-8039

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE

	Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered



Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

COMMON
(Title of class)


(Title of class)

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the
past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X] Yes [ ] No

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B is not contained in this
form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [ ]

The issuer's revenue for its most recent fiscal year was $159,166.

The Company’s common stock is listed on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board under the stock ticker symbol
“UBDE.” The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of
February 22, 2005 was $34,591.20.

The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common equity, as of November 30, 2005 was
30,304,047.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

If the following documents are incorporated by reference, briefly describe them and identify the part of the Form 10-
KSB (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) any annual report to security holders; (2)
any proxy or information statement; and (3) any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) of the Securities Act of
1933 ("Securities Act"). The listed documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual
report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1990).

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes [ ] No [X]
<R>
PART I		3
ITEM 1.	BUSINESS	3
ITEM 2.	DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY	11
ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	11
ITEM 4.	SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS	11
PART II		12
ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	12
ITEM 6.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND
FINANCIAL CONDITION		13
ITEM 7.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	16
ITEM 8.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE		33
ITEM 8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES		33
ITEM 8B. OTHER INFORMATION		34
PART III		34
ITEM 9.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE
WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT		34
ITEM 10.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	35
ITEM 11.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN SECURITY HOLDERS	36
ITEM 12.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS	37
ITEM 13.	EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K	38
ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	38
SIGNATURES		39
</R>

-2-

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements about our business, financial condition and prospects

that reflect our management’s assumptions and beliefs based on information currently available. We can give no

assurance that the expectations indicated by such forward-looking statements will be realized. If any of our

assumptions should prove incorrect, or if any of the risks and uncertainties underlying such expectations should

materialize, US Biodefense, Inc.’s actual results may differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking

statements.

The key factors that are not within our control and that may have a direct bearing on operating results include,

but are not limited to, acceptance of our services, our ability to expand its customer base, managements’ ability to raise

capital in the future, the retention of key employees and changes in the regulation of our industry.

There may be other risks and circumstances that management may be unable to predict. When used in this

Report, words such as, "believes," "expects," "intends," "plans," "anticipates," "estimates" and similar expressions

are intended to identify and qualify forward-looking statements, although there may be certain forward-looking

statements not accompanied by such expressions.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

Business Development

We were incorporated in the State of Utah on June 29, 1983, under the name Teal Eye, Inc. We merged with

Terzon Corporation and changed our name to Terzon Corporation in 1984. We subsequently changed our name to

Candy Stripers Candy Corporation. We were engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling candy and gift items

to hospital gift shops across the country. We were traded Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board for several years. In 1986

we ceased the candy manufacturing operations and filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy protection. After emerging from

Bankruptcy in 1993, we remained dormant until January 1998, when we changed our name to Piedmont, Inc. On May

13, 2003, we filed an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to change our name from Piedmont, Inc. to US

Biodefense, Inc.

We are focused on encouraging the development, manufacture and commercialization of biologic products for

the prevention and treatment of human infectious disease. Our current business strategy focuses on the potential

commercialization of biologic products to counter potential bioterrorism threats.

On February 15, 2005, we entered into a consulting agreement with an independent consultant to assist with

the development of its NIH SBIR Grant proposal related to the creation of a Stem Cell Research Center of Excellence.

The consultant will serve as a Scientific Advisor to the Company and will assist with grant writing editing and review of

a letter of intent and final proposal for the Stem Cell Center of Excellence. The agreement has a term of one year,

which may be extended upon agreement by both parties. As compensation for entering into the agreement, the

consultant will be paid at the rate of $100 per hour.

On February 23, 2005, we entered into an Option Agreement with UCL Biomedica Plc to license patent rights

applications related to the development of artificial liver and therapeutic re-population in patients with liver disease in

exchange for ₤13,245.53. This option agreement gave us a non-exclusive license for European Patent Application No.

02743434.9 and U.S. patent application 10/483,190 entitled “Liver cell progenitor and use for the treatment of liver

disease” and related foreign applications with UCL BioMedica Plc., a wholly owned subsidiary of University College

London. Our goal was to evaluate the hepatic stem cell sorting and enrichment technology, which can be applied to

gene therapy and liver re-population technology and will release more detailed information about the Hepatic Stem Cell

technology and potential applications, including gene therapy and re-population in patients with liver disease.

-3-

On February 28, 2005, we launched T2X.us, a High Tech Transfer Search Engine, which is developing a

search engine identifying intellectual property modeling the functionality of general portal search engines like Google

(NasdaqNM:GOOG - News), Yahoo (NasdaqNM:YHOO - News), and LookSmart (NasdaqNM:LOOK - News). U.S.

BioDefense staff currently uses the search engine to accelerate the identification of stem cell and biodefense intellectual

property acquisition programs. Programmers are now updating the T2X search engine for more robustness in

preparation for a commercial version launch. T2X is a search engine facilitating innovation exchange connecting VC's,

small business, and public companies seeking technologies with universities, government agencies and scientists. T2X

is an online Technology Transfer Exchange where commercial members can identify technology that is available for

licensing or partnering from universities, research labs and scientists.

On May 10, 2005, we entered into an agreement with the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center for

the priority option to review and license the patent pending technology entitled “Use of Non-marrow Stem Cell for

Cardiac Regeneration.” We paid a fee of $30,000 for the non-exclusive right to review this patent. In the last 60 years,

M. D. Anderson has built a reputation for excellence in cancer patient care, research, education and prevention.

<R>On May 11, 2005 we entered into a 24-month patent listing and technology transfer alliance agreement

with Diamond I Inc. (OTC BB:DMOI.OB - News), a developer of wireless handheld gaming products. As

consideration, we received 5,000,000 shares of the common stock of Diamond I. Under the agreement, U.S.

BioDefense will market the intellectual property on its technology transfer exchange web site www.T2X.us. We will

focus on assisting Diamond I in generating new revenue channels from potential licensees in order to rapidly bring to

market its patent pending biometric security technology. Sellers such as scientists, government agencies, corporations

and Universities with technology they wish to out-license provide either an online listing or non-confidential

descriptions of their technologies. Each day, buyers can search information online or be matched with confidential

opportunities with interests and send complete information to all parties. The site is aggregated so users can freely

access VA, SBA, EPA, FEMA, NTTC, and NASA's collection of technologies.</R>

On July 6, 2005 we entered into a six month option to license world patent application WO 03/054202 A1 and

U.S. patient application 5,958,767 entitled “Generation of Human Neural Crest Stem Cell Line and Its Utilization in

Human Transplantation” and related applications with the University of British Columbia. This technology was

developed by Dr. Seung Kim in the Department of Neurology at UBC. In exchange we paid an option fee of $5,000 to

UBC and will evaluate the neural crest stem cell line and its utilization in human transplantation, which can be used to

treat brain and spinal cord repair, and will release more detailed information about the neural crest stem cell technology

and potential applications, including gene therapy.

On October 15, 2005, we entered into an agreement with Financialnewsusa.com, a related party, to provide

consulting services to them in exchange for $40,000. The agreement has a term of six months and may be extended

upon agreement by both parties. Either party may cancel the agreement with five days written notice in the event of a

material violation of the agreement. Either party may cancel the agreement for any reason upon 30 days written notice.

We have been paid $20,000 upon execution of the agreement, with the balance of the contract due in January of 2006.

We cannot guarantee that we will be able to attract future customers and continue to generate sales.

Business of Issuer

Principal Products and Principal Markets

We plan to evaluate the economic potential of new biological technologies as we discover them. We are not in

the business of researching and developing such technologies ourselves. US Biodefense plans to license intellectual

property from researchers or organizations to evaluate its commercial feasibility. We plan to develop relationships with

universities and private entities to utilize research facilities and manpower to appraise the marketability of the

technologies. In the event a technology is found to have viable commercial applications, we will seek third-parties to

manufacture items for sale to government and corporate customers. We will rely on marketing, distribution and co-

promotion agreements for the dissemination of the items produced.

-4-

Our current focus is on evaluating potential commercial applications for cellular and viral inactivation in

accordance with the commercial evaluation license agreement we entered into with the United States Public Health

Service. The license pertains to a method of rendering viruses, parasites and tumor cells inactive. Once inactivated,

these agents can be used as vaccines against diseases caused by their harmful counterparts without the threat of

infection.

Vaccination against pathogens has been one of the major accomplishments of medicine in terms of increasing

quality and length of life. While effective vaccines have been developed for a large number of diseases, development of

safe and effective vaccines for other diseases remain problematic. The use of inactivated microbial agents, which are

essentially microbes that are no longer living organisms, as a vaccine, although generally safe, will not always be

effective if the characteristics that would provide immunity from the agents are altered. In most cases, the preferential

degradation of certain properties of the inactivated microorganism might produce a weak or poorly targeted immune

response that permits a less than ideal response when the host is later challenged with the live microorganism. On the

other hand, while the exposure to live attenuated microbial agents as vaccines will often provide improved immunity,

use of such live agents increases the risk that the vaccine itself will be infectious. Thus, there is generally a trade-off

between improved effectiveness and a greater degree of safety when selecting between the viral inactivation and viral

attenuation techniques in the preparation of vaccines.

Distribution Methods of Our Products

Our marketing activities will be focused on key vertical markets and will be primarily conducted by our

management and any independent contractors we have employ. Our marketing approach will begin with the

development of information concerning the requirements of our potential customers for the types of technical services

that we provide. This information is gathered in the course of contract performance, reviewing requests for competitive

bids, formal briefings, participation in professional organizations and published literature. This information is then

evaluated in order to devise and implement the best means of taking advantage of available business opportunities,

including the preparation of proposals responsive to the stated and perceived needs of customers. Our products may be

marketed with the assistance of independent sales representatives. We have not yet implemented any marketing

activities and have not determined when we may begin to do so.

Competitive Business Conditions and the Issuer’s Competitive Position

Our business is highly competitive. We have a large number of competitors, all of which have been

established longer and have substantially greater financial resources and larger technical staffs. We also compete with

specialized entities that are able to concentrate their resources on particular areas. We may also compete with the U.S.

Government's own in-house capabilities and federal non-profit contract research centers.

We compete on the basis of technical expertise, management and marketing abilities and price. Our continued

success is dependent upon our ability to hire and retain highly qualified scientists, engineers, technicians, management

and professional personnel who will provide superior service and performance on a cost-effective basis.

Patents, trademarks, licenses, franchises, concessions, royalty agreements or labor contracts, including duration

On February 23, 2005, we entered into a 90 day Option Agreement with UCL Biomedica Plc to license patent

rights applications related to the development of artificial liver and therapeutic re-population in patients with liver

disease in exchange for ₤13,245.53. This option agreement gave us a non-exclusive license for European Patent

Application No. 02743434.9 and U.S. patent application 10/483,190 entitled “Liver cell progenitor and use for the

treatment of liver disease” and related foreign applications with UCL BioMedica Plc., a wholly owned subsidiary of

University College London.

On May 10, 2005, we entered into an agreement with the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center for

the priority option to review and license the patent pending technology entitled “Use of Non-marrow Stem Cell for

Cardiac Regeneration.” We paid a fee of $30,000 for the non-exclusive right to review this patent. In the last 60 years,

M. D. Anderson has built a reputation for excellence in cancer patient care, research, education and prevention.

-5-

On July 6, 2005 we entered into a six month option to license world patent application WO 03/054202 A1 and

U.S. patient application 5,958,767 entitled “Generation of Human Neural Crest Stem Cell Line and Its Utilization in

Human Transplantation” and related applications with the University of British Columbia. This technology was

developed by Dr. Seung Kim in the Department of Neurology at UBC. In exchange we paid an option fee of $5,000 to

UBC and will evaluate the neural crest stem cell line and its utilization in human transplantation, which can be used to

treat brain and spinal cord repair, and will release more detailed information about the neural crest stem cell technology

and potential applications, including gene therapy.

Need for Government Approval

As part of our strategy, we will be dependent upon contracts from U.S. government agencies. All U.S.

government contracts and subcontracts may be modified, curtailed or terminated at the convenience of the government

if program requirements or budgetary constraints change. If a contract is terminated for convenience, we will be

generally reimbursed for our allowable costs, as determined by the government through the date of termination and will

be paid a proportionate amount of the stipulated profit or fee attributable to the work actually performed. Contract and

program modifications, curtailments or terminations may have a material adverse effect on our operations.

In addition, the U.S. government may terminate a contract for default. A termination could have a significant

adverse impact on our business and reputation. If a contract is terminated for default, we may be unable to recover

amounts billed or billable under the contract and may be liable for other costs and damages.

Effect of existing or probable government regulations

The terrorist attacks of September through November 2001 in the United States changed political and

budgetary attitudes towards bioterrorism threats. We believe that the U.S. government has recognized that it must

provide incentives for private industry to develop and manufacture biodefense products. On October 1, 2003, Congress

passed the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2004 which includes $5.6 billion over a 10-year

period for the purchase of medical countermeasures against bioterrorist attacks. The HSAA allows up to $885 million

of this to be spent in fiscal year 2004 and a maximum of $3.4 billion through fiscal year 2008. These purchases are

expected to commence in the government’s 2004 fiscal year, which began on October 1, 2003.

In January 2003, President Bush announced Project BioShield with the intention of accelerating the availability

of effective countermeasures against bioterrorism. If passed, Project BioShield would increase the NIH’s authorities

and flexibility to facilitate the development of new products for biodefense, establish a U.S. Food and Drug

Administration (“FDA”) emergency use authorization and provide an efficient mechanism for biodefense vaccine

purchase. In July 2003, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Project BioShield legislation by a vote of 421-to-

2. The legislation is pending approval in the U.S. Senate.

The technology we are evaluating, if deemed commercially viable, will be subject to federal regulation in the

United States, principally by the FDA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and by state and local

governments, as well as regulatory and other authorities in foreign governments. Such regulations govern or influence,

among other things, the testing, manufacture, safety and efficacy requirements, labeling, storage, record keeping,

licensing, advertising, promotion, distribution and export of products, manufacturing and the manufacturing process. In

many foreign countries, such regulations also govern coverage and the prices charged for products under their

respective national social security systems. The potential resultant products we seek to bring to market will be

considered biological drug products. Biologics are subject to rigorous regulation by the FDA in the United States and

similar regulatory bodies in other countries. This process is lengthy and we will not be able generate revenues in the

event any potential biologic application is denied.

Amount spent during each of the last two fiscal years on research and development

We do not conduct research and development activities in-house. We contract with third-party laboratories

and research facilities to conduct a significantly all of our research and development activities. As a result, we have

incurred a total of $98,796 in research and development related expenses over the past two fiscal years.

-6-

Employees

We do not have any employees. Instead, we presently rely on the efforts of our President, David Chin, who

devotes an average of 10 hours per week to our operations. We believe that our operations are currently on a small

scale that is manageable by a one individual. While we believe that the addition of employees is not required over the

next 12 months, we may contract independent contracts to assist in the implementation and/or marketing of our

business. These representatives are not intended to be employees of our company.

Reports to Security Holders

Annual Reports

We intend to furnish our shareholders with audited annual financial reports certified by our independent

registered public accountants, and may, in our discretion, furnish unaudited quarterly financial reports.

Periodic Reports with the SEC

We are a reporting issuer with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We file annual reports on Form 10-

KSB, quarterly reports on Form 10-QSB, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports filed or

furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended as required to maintain

the fully reporting status.

Availability of Filings

You may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F

Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20002. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by

calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Our SEC filings will be available on the SEC Internet site, located at

http://www.sec.gov.

Risk Factors

We may not be able to attain profitability without additional funding, which may be unavailable.

We have limited capital resources. To date, we have funded our operations from the sale of equity securities

and have generated limited cash from operations. Unless we begin to generate sufficient recurring revenues to finance

operations as a going concern, we may experience liquidity and solvency problems. Such liquidity and solvency

problems may force us to go out of business if additional financing is not available. No alternative sources of funds are

available to us in the event we are unable to locate adequate capital.

Our independent registered public accountants have qualified their report to express substantial doubt about our

company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

As of the date of this annual report, we have an accumulated deficit in the amount of $3,785,355. Taking this

fact into account, our independent registered public accountants have expressed substantial doubt about our ability to

continue as a going concern in their report to the financial statements included in this annual report. If our business

fails, you may face a complete loss of your investment.

-7-

*We do not have any facilities appropriate for clinical testing, we lack significant manufacturing experience and we*
*have very limited sales and marketing personnel. We are currently dependent upon our acquiring licenses or others*
*for several of these functions and will likely remain dependent upon others for these functions.*

		We do not have a manufacturing facility that can be used for production of our products. In addition, at this
time, we have very limited sales and marketing personnel. We are currently dependent upon our licensees or others for
several of these functions and in the course of our development program, we will likely be required to enter into
additional arrangements with other companies or universities or clinical investigators for our animal testing, human
clinical testing, manufacturing, and sales and marketing activities. If our licensees breach their obligations under our
license agreements to perform these functions or we are otherwise unable to retain third parties for these purposes on
acceptable terms, we may be unable to successfully develop, manufacture and market our proposed products. In
addition, any failures by third parties to adequately perform their responsibilities may delay the submission of our
proposed products for regulatory approval, impair our ability to deliver our products on a timely basis or otherwise
impair our competitive position. Our dependence on third parties for the development, manufacture, sale and marketing
of our products also may adversely affect our profit margins.

*We intend to continue to license our vaccine candidates from third parties and there is no guarantee that any*
*candidate will be economically viable.*

		We currently license for commercial evaluation a viral and cellular inactivation technology and intend to
continue to license further biotechnology from third-parties. We do not conduct our own research and development
activities. The technology we license and any future technology we may license are unproven and may be unsuitable
for commercial use. In the event we are unable to commercialize any licensed technology, we will be unable to
generate revenues. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that, if the licensed technology is deemed commercially viable,
we will be able to obtain sales and marketing agreements, in which case we will be unable to generate revenues.

*Product development efforts may not yield marketable products due to results of studies or trials, failure to achieve*
*regulatory approvals or market acceptance, proprietary rights of others or manufacturing issues.*

		Our success depends on our ability to identify commercial applications, successfully develop and obtain
regulatory approval to market new biopharmaceutical products. We expect that a significant portion of the technology
that we will evaluate will involve new and unproven technologies. Our potential products may appear to be promising
at various stages of development yet fail to reach the market for a number of reasons, including the:

1.		lack of adequate quality or sufficient prevention benefit, or unacceptable safety during pre-clinical studies or
		clinical trials;

2.		failure to receive necessary regulatory approvals;

3.		existence of proprietary rights of third parties; or

4.		inability to develop manufacturing methods that are efficient, cost-effective and capable of meeting stringent
		regulatory standards.

*We will be significantly dependent upon contracts with the U.S. government. If we are unable to obtain contracts to*
*supply the U.S. government, we may not be able to continue our business.*

		The process of obtaining U.S. government contracts is lengthy and uncertain and we must compete for each
contract. Moreover, the award of one government contract does not necessarily secure the award of future contracts
covering the same vaccine. We cannot be certain that we will be awarded any future contracts with the U.S.
government. We currently have no products to sell. However, upon commencement of our operations, of which we
cannot assure you, if we are unable to obtain contract awards to supply our products to the U.S. government, our
business will be harmed and it is unlikely that we will be able to ultimately commercialize any particular vaccine.

-8-

If we are unable to commercialize vaccine candidates, we will be unable to generate revenues.

The determination of when and whether a product is ready for large scale purchase and potential use will be

made by the government through consultation with a number of governmental agencies, including the Food and Drug

Administration, the National Institute of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and the Department of Homeland

Security. President Bush has proposed, and Congress is considering, measures to accelerate the development of

biodefense products through NIH funding, the review process by the FDA and the final government procurement

contracting authority. While this may help speed the approval of any prospective future vaccine candidates, it may also

encourage competitors to develop their own vaccine candidates. If competitive vaccine candidates gain approval, we

could face severe competition, which could harm our business.

Vaccine development is a long, expensive and uncertain process, and delay or failure can occur at any stage of

clinical trials.

To develop vaccine candidates, we or our agents must provide the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities with

clinical data that demonstrate adequate safety and immune response. Statistically significant effectiveness of our

biodefense product candidates cannot initially be demonstrated in humans, but instead must be demonstrated, in part, by

utilizing animal models before they can be approved for commercial sale. Vaccine development to show adequate

evidence of effectiveness in animal models and safety and immune response in humans is a long, expensive and

uncertain process, and delay or failure can occur at any stage of our animal studies or clinical trials. Any delay or

significant adverse clinical events arising during any of our clinical trials could force us to abandon a vaccine candidate

altogether or to conduct additional clinical trials in order to obtain approval from the FDA or foreign regulatory bodies.

These development efforts and clinical trials are lengthy and expensive, and the outcome is uncertain. If we are unable

to successfully develop our vaccine candidates, our revenues will suffer and our stock price is likely to decline.

The independent clinical investigators that we intend to rely upon to conduct clinical trials may not be diligent,

careful or timely and may make mistakes in the conduct of our clinical trials.

We intend to rely on independent clinical investigators to conduct our clinical trials. The investigators are not

our employees, and we cannot control the amount or timing of resources that they devote to our vaccine development

programs. If independent investigators fail to devote sufficient time and resources to our vaccine development

programs, or if their performance is substandard, it may delay FDA approval of our vaccine candidates. These

independent investigators may also have relationships with other commercial entities, some of which may compete with

us. If these independent investigators assist our competitors at our expense, it could harm our competitive position.

Political or social factors may delay or impair our ability to market vaccine products.

Products developed to treat diseases caused by or to combat the threat of bioterrorism will be subject to

changing political and social environments. The political and social responses to bioterrorism have been highly charged

and unpredictable. Political or social pressures may delay or cause resistance to bringing our products to market or limit

pricing of our products, which would harm our business.

-9-

We may fail to protect our intellectual property or may infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, either of

which could harm our business.

If we are unable to protect our intellectual property, we may be unable to prevent other companies from using

our technology in competitive products. If we infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, we may be

prevented from developing or marketing our product candidates. We rely on patent and other intellectual property

protection to prevent our competitors from manufacturing and marketing our product candidates. Our technology,

including technology licensed from the National Institute of Health, or that we may license in the future, if any, will be

protected from unauthorized use by others only to the extent that it is covered by valid and enforceable patents or

effectively maintained as trade secrets. The patent positions of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies can be

highly uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions. No consistent policy regarding the breadth of claims

allowed in biotechnology patents has emerged to date. Accordingly, we cannot predict the scope and breadth of patent

claims that may be afforded to other companies’ patents. In addition, we could incur substantial costs in litigation if we

are required to defend against patent suits brought by third parties, or if we initiate these suits.

Because of competitive pressures from competitors with more resources we may fail to implement our business model

profitably.

We are entering a highly competitive market segment. Our expected competitors include several larger and

more established companies in the biodefense and pharmaceutical industries. Generally, our actual and potential

competitors have substantially greater capital resources, larger research and development staffs and facilities, greater

experience in drug development and in obtaining regulatory approvals, and greater marketing capabilities than we do.

Our competitors include fully integrated pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies that currently have

drug and target discovery efforts, as well as universities and public and private research institutions. Our commercial

opportunities will be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and market products that we target. Researchers

are continually learning more about diseases, which may lead to new technologies for treatment. Our competitors may

succeed in developing and marketing products either that are more effective than those that we may develop, alone or

with our collaborators, or that are marketed before any products we develop are marketed.

We currently do not have an internal marketing and sales force and may rely on third parties for the sales or

marketing of some or all of our vaccines if they are successfully developed. Our dependence on third parties may

delay or impair our ability to generate revenues, or adversely affect our profitability.

We lack any sales or marketing history, and as of present do not have plans on developing internally such

capability. We intend to rely on third parties for the sales and marketing of our products to entities other than the U.S.

and foreign governments. Our lack of sales and marketing personnel and distribution relationships may impair our

ability to generate revenues.

Failure to hire and retain key management employees could adversely affect our ability to obtain financing, develop

our products, conduct clinical trials or execute our business strategy.

We are highly dependent on our senior management. These individuals have played a critical role in raising

capital and negotiating business development opportunities. If we lose the services of any key members of senior

management and we are unable to recruit qualified replacements where we deem it necessary, we may be unable to

achieve our business objectives.

Our management is involved with other business activities, which could reduce the time they allocate to our

operations.

Our operations depend substantially on the skills and experience of Mr. David Chin, our President. Mr. Chin is

involved in other business activities and may, in the future, become involved in other business opportunities. If a

specific business opportunity becomes available, one or more of these individuals may face a conflict in selecting

between US Biodefense and his other business interests. We have not formulated a policy for the resolution of such

conflicts.

-10-

*Our stock is a speculative investment that may result in losses to investors.*

The trading price of our common stock is subject to wide fluctuations in response to various events or factors,
many of which are beyond our control. In addition, the stock market may experience extreme price and volume
fluctuations, which, without a direct relationship to the operating performance, may affect the market price of our stock.

ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

Description of Property

US Biodefense, Inc. has its headquarters in California. The mailing address is US Biodefense, Inc., 13674 E.
Valley Blvd., City of Industry, CA 91746, phone: (626) 961-8039. This office is provided by our officer and director at
a charge of $3,000, which includes rent and various shared expenses, which include a receptionist, various office
equipment and furniture and utilities expense. There are currently no proposed programs for the renovation,
improvement or development of the facilities we currently use. We believe that this arrangement is suitable given the
nature of our current operations, and also believe that we will not need to lease additional administrative offices for at
least the next 12 months.

Investment Policies

Our management does not currently have policies regarding the acquisition or sale of real estate assets
primarily for possible capital gain or primarily for income. We do not presently hold any investments or interests in real
estate, investments in real estate mortgages or securities of or interests in persons primarily engaged in real estate
activities.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

No Director, officer, significant employee or consultant of US Biodefense, Inc. has been convicted in a
criminal proceeding, exclusive of traffic violations.

No Director, officer, significant employee or consultant of US Biodefense, Inc. has been permanently or
temporarily enjoined, barred, suspended, or otherwise limited from involvement in any type of business, securities or
banking activities.

No Director, officer, significant employee or consultant of US Biodefense, Inc. has been convicted of violating
a federal or state securities or commodities law.

We are not a party to any pending legal proceedings.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

On January 16, 2005, our board of directors recommended, and David Chin, the holder of the majority of our
capital stock, voted in favor of a resolution authorizing our board of directors to implement a forward stock split of our
common stock on the basis of three shares for each one share. A Schedule 14C was filed on or about January 18, 2005
discussing such matter.

On December 1, 2005, our board of directors recommended, and David Chin, the holder of the majority of our
capital stock and voting power, voted in favor of a resolution to effected proposals by written consent in lieu of a special
meeting. At such meeting, the following proposals were heard and subsequently approved by the majority
shareholder’s written consent:

Proposal	Votes for	Votes against	Withheld

Reappoint David Chin as Director	27,292,119	0	0
Reappoint Marcia Marcus as Director	27,292,119	0	0
Appoint Cyndi Chen as Director	27,292,119	0	0
-11-

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Market information

The Company’s common stock is currently traded on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board under the stock
ticker symbol “UBDF.” The following table sets forth the monthly high and low prices for the Company's common
stock on the OTCBB^®for each quarter of the last two fiscal years:

Quarter Ended	High	Low

November 30, 2005	$ 5.00	$ 2.50
August 31, 2005	$ 5.25	$ 4.00
May 31, 2005	$ 6.40	$ 4.00
February 28, 2005	$13.33	$ 6.33

November 30, 2004	$ 6.58	$ 6.00
August 31, 2004	$ 7.083	$ 4.333
May 31, 2004	$ 5.00	$ 3.35
February 28, 2004	$ 7.00	$ 3.35

OTCBB^®quotations of the Company’s Common Stock reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-ups,
markdowns or commissions, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

Shares Available Under Rule 144

As of November 30, 2004, there were 30,292,119 shares of common stock that are considered restricted
securities under Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933. Of the 30,292,119 restricted shares issued and outstanding,
27,292,119 shares are held by David Chin, an affiliate, as that term is defined in Rule 144(a)(1).

In general, under Rule 144 as amended, a person who has beneficially owned and held "restricted"
securities for at least one year, including "affiliates," may sell publicly without registration under the Securities
Act, within any three-month period, assuming compliance with other provisions of the Rule, a number of shares
that do not exceed the greater of (i) one percent of the common stock then outstanding or, (ii) the average weekly
trading volume in the common stock during the four calendar weeks preceding such sale. A person who is not deemed
an "affiliate" of our Company and who has beneficially owned shares for at least two years would be entitled to
unlimited resales of such restricted securities under Rule 144 without regard to the volume and other limitations
described above.

Holders

As of the date of this prospectus, we have approximately 30,304,047 shares of $0.001 par value common stock
issued and outstanding held by approximately 100 shareholders of record.

Dividends

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. For the foreseeable future, we
intend to retain any earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business, and we do not anticipate paying
any cash dividends on its common stock. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of the
Board of Directors and will be dependent upon then existing conditions, including our financial condition and results of
operations, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, business prospects, and other factors that the board of directors
considers relevant.

-12-

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

	The following table provides the following information as of November 30, 2005, for equity compensation
plans previously approved by security holders, as well as those not previously approved by security holders:

1.	The number of securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights;

2.	The weighted-average exercise price of the outstanding options, warrants and rights; and

3.	Other than securities to be issued upon the exercise of the outstanding options, warrants and rights, the number
	of securities remaining available for future issuance under the plan.

		Number of
		Securities to be
		issued upon	Weighted average	Number of
		exercise of	exercise price of	securities remaining
		outstanding options,	outstanding options,	available for future
	Plan Category	warrants and rights	warrants and rights	issuance
		(a)	(b)	(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by		-	-	-
security holders

Equity compensation plans not approved by		-	-	-
security holders

Total		-	-	-

ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND
FINANCIAL CONDITION

Overview

	We were incorporated in the State of Utah on June 29, 1983, under the name Teal Eye, Inc. We merged with
Terzon Corporation and changed our name to Terzon Corporation in 1984. We subsequently changed our name to
Candy Stripers Candy Corporation. We were engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling candy and gift items
to hospital gift shops across the country. We were traded Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board for several years. In 1986
we ceased the candy manufacturing operations and filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy protection. After emerging from
Bankruptcy in 1993, we remained dormant until January 1998, when we changed our name to Piedmont, Inc. On May
13, 2003, we filed an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to change our name from Piedmont, Inc. to US
Biodefense, Inc. We are a registered government contractor with the Department of Defense Logistics Agency that is
focused on designing ad developing homeland security and biodefense products.

*www.T2X.us*

	On February 28, 2005, we launched T2X.us, a High Tech Transfer Search Engine, which is developing a
search engine identifying intellectual property. U.S. BioDefense staff currently uses the search engine to accelerate the
identification of stem cell and biodefense intellectual property acquisition programs. T2X is a search engine facilitating
innovation exchange connecting VC's, small business, and public companies seeking technologies with universities,
government agencies and scientists. Programmers are now updating the T2X search engine for more robustness in
preparation for a commercial version launch. We do not expect to generate any revenues from this business segment for
at least the 12 months of operations.

-13-

Diamond I, Inc.

On June 20, 2005 we entered into a patent listing and technology transfer alliance agreement with Diamond I

Inc. (OTC BB:DMOI.OB - News), a developer of wireless handheld gaming products. Under the agreement, U.S.

BioDefense will market the intellectual property on its technology transfer exchange web site www.T2X.us. We will

focus on assisting Diamond I in generating new revenue channels from potential licensees in order to rapidly bring to

market its patent pending biometric security technology. Sellers such as scientists, government agencies, corporations

and Universities with technology they wish to out-license provide either an online listing or non-confidential

descriptions of their technologies. Each day, buyers can search information online or be matched with confidential

opportunities with interests and send complete information to all parties. The site is aggregated so users can freely

access VA, SBA, EPA, FEMA, NTTC, and NASA's collection of technologies.

Financialnewsusa.com, Inc.

On October 15, 2005, we entered into an agreement with Financialnewsusa.com, a related party, to provide

consulting services to them in exchange for $40,000. The agreement has a term of six months and may be extended

upon agreement by both parties. Either party may cancel the agreement with five days written notice in the event of a

material violation of the agreement. Either party may cancel the agreement for any reason upon 30 days written notice.

We have been paid $20,000 upon execution of the agreement, with the balance of the contract due in January of 2006.

We cannot guarantee that we will be able to attract future customers and continue to generate sales.

Results of Operations

<R>Revenues

Our revenues totaled $159,166 for the current fiscal year ended November 30, 2005, compared to $29,167 for

the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004. The increase in revenues represent a year-over-year increase of 446%, which

was due in part to our contracts with Financialnewsusa.com and Diamond I, Inc. Of the $159,166 in revenues generated

during the year ended November 30, 2005, a total of $134,166 has been recognized from our agreement with

Financialnewsusa.com, to which we provided biodefense-related industry news and information to

Financialnewsusa.com. The balance of our revenues earned in the year ended November 30, 2005, or $25,000, is

attributable to our arrangement to identify technology commercialization opportunities for Diamond I to research

universities, government laboratories and third member private parties.

Revenues for the year ended November 30, 2004, in the amount of $29,167, were attributable solely to the

May 1, 2004 agreement with Financialnewsusa.com, a related party, to provide consulting services to them in exchange

for $50,000, for which we were paid in advance the entire balance of the contract.

Other than our agreement with Financialnewsusa.com and Diamond I, we do not have any long-term

agreements to provide our services to any single customer or group of customers. As a result, we are unable to predict

the stability of, and ability to continue to generate, ongoing revenues.</R>

Expenses

Total expenses for the year ended November 30, 2005 were $195,572. In the comparable year ago period

ended November 30, 2004, we incurred total expenses of $58,131. Aggregate expenses increased approximately 236%,

or $137,441, due primarily to an increase of 2,623%, or $91,796, in research and development costs from $3,500 during

the year ended November 30, 2004, to $95,296 in the year ended November 30, 2005. The significant increase in

attributable to the various intellectual property option and licensing agreements entered into during the year ended

November 30, 2005. We believe obtaining and maintaining such licenses for intellectual property is a significant aspect

of our business plan and will continue for the next at least 12 months.

-14-

An expenditure we did not have in the prior year ended November 30, 2004 that we began recognizing in the
most recent year ended November 30, 2005 is occupational costs and expenses in the amount of $36,000. These
expenses encompass $13,000 in rent expense and $23,000 of miscellaneous shared overhead such as a receptionist,
various office equipment and furniture and utilities expense. We expect occupational costs to continue to be incurred
over the next at least 12 months.

General and administrative expenses increased 199% year over year from $3,535 in 2004 to $10,575 in 2005.
Or management believes the rise in these expenditures are correlated with our increased business activities and pursuit
of our business objectives. General and administrative expenses mainly consist of office expenditures such as postage
and delivery fees, supplies and other similar miscellaneous items. We expect to continue to incur general and
administrative expenses for the foreseeable future, although we cannot estimate the extent of these costs.

Due to our increased operational activities, we contracted services from outside parties, including attorneys,
accountants and consultants. As a result, total expenses paid in relation to consulting and outside services and
professional fees grew 56%, or $26,096, from the year ended November 30, 2004 to $33,313 during the year ended
November 30, 2005. Our management believes that the growth of our company is dependent upon the services
provided by individuals who are not our employees. Additionally, outsourcing is important in lowering fixed costs, so
we expect to continue to do so for the foreseeable future.

In spite of the trend of higher overall expenses, our payroll decreased from $25,000 in the year ended
November 30, 2004 to $20,389 for the year ended November 30, 2005. The sole reason for the decrease in payroll
expenses is the full expense of the remaining balance of common stock issued to David Chin, our President, in
accordance with his employment agreement. We currently do not have any employment agreements outstanding with
any individual, thus we may not incur payroll expenses in the near future. However, we cannot predict with certainty
whether or not we will hire personnel in the next 12 months.

We expect to continue to incur expenditures in the foreseeable future related to ongoing research and
development and the expansion of our business operations. As we continue to pursue research and development efforts,
we expect expenses to stabilize over the next several years. Unfortunately, we cannot accurately estimate the extent or
impact of ongoing expenses.

Losses

Our loss before accounting for income taxes totaled $36,406 for the year ended November 30, 2005, compared
to a loss before income taxes of $28,964 in the prior period. After factoring income taxes of $9,596 in the year ended
November 30, 2005, our net loss from operations totaled $46,002. In the prior year ended November 30, 2004, we did
not recognize any income taxes, thus our net loss was $28,964. This represents a widening deficit of 59%, or $17,038,
in a year-to-year comparison. Although we anticipate incurring ongoing operating losses, we expect these losses to
narrow in year-to-year comparison as we generate increased revenues and as expenses begin to plateau over the next
several years. However, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of our expectations.

Liquidity And Capital Resources

We have limited cash on hand, and may be unable to continue operations for the next at least 12 months if we
are unable to generate revenues or obtain capital infusions by issuing equity or debt securities in exchange for cash. If
we are unable to obtain capital through issuances of equity or debt, David Chin, a shareholder and President of our
company, has verbally agreed to loan us cash, which shall bear no interest and be due upon demand. As of November
30, 2005, David Chin loaned us a total of $4,313 to pay for general and administrative expenses. The loan bears no
interest and is due upon demand. As of November 30, 2005, the amount owed is $1,812. We have no formal written
agreement with Mr. Chin for any further loans, and we cannot guarantee you that we will be able to enforce our verbal
agreement. Notwithstanding this, there can be no assurance that we will be able to secure additional funds in the future
to stay in business. Our principal accountants have expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern because we have limited operations.

There are no known trends, events or uncertainties that have had or that are reasonably expected to have a
material impact on our revenues from continuing operations.
-15-

Our management does not anticipate the need to hire additional full- or part- time employees over the next 12
months, as the services provided by our officers and directors appear sufficient at this time. We believe that our
operations are currently on a small scale that is manageable by a few individuals. While we believe that the addition of
employees is not required over the next 12 months, we intend to hire independent contractors to perform research
activities and market any potential products and services we may develop.

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

We currently do not own any significant plant or equipment that we would seek to sell in the near future.

We have not paid for expenses on behalf of any of our directors. Additionally, we believe that this fact shall
not materially change.

ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following documents (pages F-1 to F-13) form part of the report on the Financial Statements

		PAGE

Independent Auditor’s Report		F-1
Consolidated Balance Sheet		F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations		F-3
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income		F-4
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)		F-5
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows		F-6
Notes to Financial Statements		F-7

-16-

E. Randall Gruber, CPA, PC

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS OF

US BIODEFENSE, INC.

I have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of US Biodefense, Inc. as of November 30, 2005 and 2004

and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash

flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. My

responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audit.

I conducted my audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United

States). Those standards require that I plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the

financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence

supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting

principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement

presentation. I believe that my audits provide a reasonable basis for my opinion.

In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated

financial position of US Biodefense, Inc. as of November 30, 2005 and 2004 and the consolidated results of its

operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a

going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the accompanying financial statements, the Company has no established

source of revenue, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plan in

regard to these matters is also discussed in Note 1. These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might

result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

E. Randall Gruber, CPA, PC

St. Louis, Missouri

February 21, 2006

F-1

US Biodefense, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheet
November 30, 2005 and 2004

ASSETS
	2005	2004
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$17,223	$33,558
Marketable securities available for sale – Note	150,000	----
Prepaid services – Related party	20,000	----

Total current assets	187,223	33,558

Licenses	20,000	----
Deposits	1,000	----

Total assets	208,223	33,558

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities
Accounts payable	79,167	376
Bank overdraft	3,947	----
Notes payable – Related party	1,812	4,313
Accrued income taxes	9,596	----
Deferred revenues	101,667	20,833

Total current liabilities	196,189	25,522

Deferred taxes	19,150	----

Total liabilities	215,339	25,522

Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock 100,000,000 shares authorized, $.0001
par value, 30,304,047 shares issued and outstanding	30,304	30,304
Additional paid in capital	3,773,086	3,773,086
Accumulated deficit	(3,841,356)	(3,795,354)
Other comprehensive income	30,850	----

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)	(7,116)	8,036

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)	$208,223	$33,558

See accompanying notes to financial statements

F-2

US Biodefense, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the years ended November 30, 2005 and 2004

	2005	2004

Revenues (related parties $134,166 and $29,167)
for 2005 and 2004 respectively)	$159,166	$29,167

Research and development expenses	95,296	3,500
Consulting and outside services	20,977	16,500
Payroll and payroll costs	20,389	25,000
Occupational costs and expenses	36,000	----
Professional fees	12,336	9,596
General and administrative expenses	10,575	3,535

Total expenses	199,572	58,131

Loss before income taxes	(36,406)	(28,964)

Income taxes	9,596	----

Net loss	$(46,002)	$(28,964)

Weighted average number of shares
outstanding – basic and fully diluted	30,304,047	30,304,047

Basic and diluted net income (loss)
per common share	$(0.00)	$(0.00)

See accompanying notes to financial statements
F-3

US Biodefense, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the year ended November 30, 2005

Net loss		$(36,406)

Unrealized income on securities held for resale, net of tax of $19,150		30,850

Total comprehensive income		$(5,556)

See accompanying notes to financial statements

F-4

US Biodefense, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
For the years ended November 30, 2005 and 2004

			Additional		Other
	Common Stock		Paid-in	Accumulated	Comprehensive
	Shares	Amount	Capital	Deficit	Income	Total

Balance, November 30, 2003	10,101,349	$10,101	$3,793,289	$(3,766,390)	$----	$37,000
Net loss for the year ended
November 30, 2004	----	----	----	(28,964)	----	(29,964)

Balance, November 30, 2004	10,101,349	10,101	3,793,289	$(3,795,354)		8,036

Three for one stock split	20,202,968	20,203	(20,203)
Change in unrealized gain on
available for sale securities,
net of tax effects of $19,150					30,850	30,850
Net loss for the year ended
November 30, 2005				(46,002)		(46,002)

Balance November 30, 2004	30,304,047	$30,304	$3,773,086	$(3,841,356)	$30,850	$(7,116)

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

F-5

US Biodefense, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
For the years ended November 30, 2005 and 2004
<R>
	2005	2004

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$(46,002)	$(28,964)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities:
Consulting services paid by receipt of stock	(25,000)	----
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Prepaid services – Related party	(20,000)	----
Prepaid expenses	----	37,000
Accounts payable	78,791	376
Bank overdraft	3,947	---
Deferred revenues	5,834	20,833
Accrued income taxes	9,596	----
Notes payable – Related party	---	---

Net cash used by operating activities	7,166	29,245

Cash flows from financing activities:
Payment on long-term debt – Related parties	(2,501)	---
Additional loans from related parties	---	4,313
Total cash flow from financing activities	(2,501)	4,313

Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of licenses	(20,000)	----
Increase in deposits	(1,000)	----

Total cash flows from investing activities	(21,000)	----

Increase in cash and cash equivalents	(16,335)	33,558

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year	33,558	---

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$17,223	$33,558

Income taxes paid	$----	$----
Interest expense paid	----	----

Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities:

The Company acquired marketable equity securities with a fair
market value of $150,000 in exchange for consulting services.
In conjunction with the acquisition, the Company acquired the following
liabilities:

Deferred income	$125,000
Other comprehensive income to represent the increase in
fair value of this marketable equity security	25,000

	$150,000

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-6</R>

US Biodefense, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 1 – Background and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Background

US Biodefense , Inc. (the "Company"), a Utah corporation is headquartered in the City of

Industry, California. The Company is a registered government contractor with the Department

of Defense Logistics Agency. The Company is focused on designing and developing

homeland security and biodefense products.

The Company was originally incorporated under the name Teal Eye, Inc. in the state of

Utah on June 29, 1983. The Company then merged with Terzon Corp. and amended its

Articles of Incorporation to change the name to Terzon Corp. On September 7, 1984,

the Company amended its articles of incorporation changing its name to Candy Stripers

Corporation, Inc. On January 6, 1998, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation

changing its name to Piedmont, Inc. On May 31, 2003, the Company amended its

articles of Incorporation and changed its name to US Biodefense, Inc.

The accompanying financial statements for the year ended November 30, 2005 include the

accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary Stem Cell Research Institute, Inc.

All significant intercompany transactions and account balances have been eliminated.

Following is a summary of the Company's significant accounting policies.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting

principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation

of the Company as a going concern. The Company incurred a net loss for the year ended

November 30, 2005 of $46,002 and at November 30, 2005, had an accumulated deficit

of $3,877,822. In addition, the Company generates minimal revenue from its operations.

These conditions raise substantial doubt as to the Company's ability to continue as a growing

concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from

the outcome of this uncertainty. These financial statements do not include any adjustments

relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts, or amounts and

classification of recorded asset amounts, or amounts and classification of liabilities that might

be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Management plans to take the following steps that it believes will be sufficient to provide the

Company with the ability to continue in existence.

Management intends to raise financing through the issuance of its common stock or other means

and interests that it deems necessary, with a view to moving forward with the development of the

homeland security and biodefense products, and stem cell research.

F-7

US Biodefense, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted

in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that

affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at

the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during

the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

For certain of the Company's financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, prepaid

expenses, accounts payable and deferred revenues, the carrying amounts approximate fair value

due to their short maturities.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenues when all of the criteria in SAB 104, Topic 13 - Revenue Recog-

nition are met. Revenues are realized or realizable and earned when there exists persuasive evidence

that an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the Company's

price to it's customer is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured.

Revenues from services under contracts, including consulting, are recognized ratably over the term

of the contract. In cases where the services are considered "project" in nature, the Company

recognizes revenue as the services are performed. The contracts include the pricing agreed to by the

Company and the customer and the criteria for payment. If at the outset of the customer arrangement

the Company determines that the arrangement fee is not fixed or determinable or that collectibility is

not probable, the Company defers the revenues and recognizes the revenues when the arrangement

fee becomes due and payable or as cash is received when collectibility concerns exist.

Deferred revenues consists of amounts billed in excess of revenues recognized on consulting services.

Deferred revenues are subsequently recorded as revenues in a subsequent period using the revenue

recognition policies.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments which subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk include cash

and cash equivalents.

The Company maintains its cash in well-known banks selected based upon management's

assessment of the bank's financial stability. Balances may periodically exceed the $100,000

federal depository insurance limit; however, the Company has not experienced any losses on

deposits. The Company extends credit based on an evaluation of the customer's financial condition,

generally without collateral. Exposure to losses on receivables is principally dependent on each

customer's financial condition. The Company monitors its exposure for credit losses and maintains

allowances for anticipated losses, as required.

F-8

US Biodefense, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

Cash Equivalents

For purposes of reporting cash flows, the Company considers all short-term investments with an

original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalent.

Comprehensive Income

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive

Income," establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its

components in the financial statements. For the years ended November 30, 2005, the Company

has items that represent other comprehensive income, and accordingly, has included a schedule

of comprehensive income in the financial statements.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. There were no advertising costs for the years

ended November 30, 2005 and 2004.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under SFAS 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." Under

the asset and liability method of SFAS 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized

for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statements

carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax

assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income

in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

Segment Reporting

Based on the Company's integration and management strategies, the Company operated in a

single business segment for the year ended November 30, 2005.

Loss per Share

In accordance with SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share," the basic income / (loss) per common

share is computed by dividing net income / (loss) available to common stockholders by the

weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted income per common share is

computed similar to basic income per share except that the denominator is increased to include

the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common

shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. As of November 30,

2005 and 2004, the Company does not have any equity or debt instruments outstanding that can be

converted into common stock.

F-9

US Biodefense, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based employee compensation arrangements in accordance

with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued

to Employees" and complies with the disclosure provisions of SFAS 123, "Accounting for Stock-

Based Compensation." Under APB 25, compensation cost is recognized over the vesting period

based on the excess, if any, on the date of the grant of the deemed fair value of the Company's

shares over the employee's exercise price. When the exercise price of the employee share

options is less than the fair value price of the underlying shares on the grant date, deferred stock

compensation is recognized and amortized to expense in accordance with FASB Interpretation

No. 28 over the vesting period of the individual options. Accordingly, because the exercise price

of the Company's employee options equals or exceeds the market price of the underlying shares

on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized. Options or shares awards

issued to non-employees are valued using the fair value method and expensed over the period

services are provided.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

In the event that facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a long-lived asset,

including associated intangibles, may be impaired, an evaluation of recoverability is performed

by comparing the estimated future undiscounted cash flows, associated with the asset or the

asset's estimated fair value to the asset's carrying amount to determine if a write-down to market

value or discounted cash flow is required.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities"

(an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51, Consolidation Financial State-

ments). Interpretation 46 addresses consolidation by business enterprises of entities to which the

usual condition of consolidation described in ARB-5 does not apply. The Interpretation changes

the criteria by which one company includes another entity in its consolidated financial statements.

The general requirement to consolidate under ARB-51 is based on the presumption that an enter-

prise's financial statement should include all of the entities in which it has a controlling financial

interest (i.e., majority voting interest). Interpretation 46 requires a variable interest entity to receive

a majority of the entity's residual returns or both. A company that consolidated a variable interest

entity is called the primary beneficiary of that entity. In December 2003, the FASB concluded to

revise certain elements of FIN 46, primarily to clarify the required accounting for interests in variable

interest entities. FIN-46R replaces FIN-46. that was issued in January, 2003. FIN-46R exempts

certain entities from its requirements and provides for special effective dates for entities that have

fully or partially applied FIN-46 as of December 24, 2003. In certain situations, entities have the

option of applying or continuing to apply FIN-46 for a short period of time before applying IN-46R.

In general, for all entities that were previously considered special purpose entities, FIN 46 should

be applied for registrants who file under Regulation SX in periods ending after March 31, 2004, and

for registrants who file under Regulation SB, in periods ending after December 15, 2004. The

Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on the Company's financial

position or results of operations.

F-10

US Biodefense, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

During April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS 149 - "Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative

Instruments and Hedging Activities", effective for contracts entered into or modified after

September 30, 2003, except as stated below and for hedging relationships designated after

September 30, 2003. In addition, except as stated below, all provisions of this Statement should

be applied prospectively. The provisions of this Statement that relate to Statement 133 Implement-

ation Issues that have been effective for fiscal quarters that began prior to June 15, 2003, should

continue to be applied in accordance with their respective effective dates. In addition, paragraphs

7(a) and 23(a), which relate to forward purchases or sales of when-issued securities or other

securities that do not yet exist, should be applied to both existing contracts and new contracts

entered into after September 30, 2003. The adoption of this statement had no impact on the

Company's financial statements.

During May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS 150 - "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with

Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity", effective for financial instruments entered into or

modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective for public entities at the beginning of the

first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. This Statement establishes standards for how

an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instrument with characteristics of both

liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a freestanding financial instrument that is

within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). Many of those instruments

were previously classified as equity. Some of the provisions of this Statement are consistent with

the current definition of liabilities in FASB Concepts Statement No. 6, Element of Financial

Statements. The adoption of this statement had no impact on the Company's financial statements.

In December 2003, the FASB issued a revised SFAS No. 132, "Employers' Disclosures about

Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits" which replaces the previously issued Statement. The

revised Statement increases the existing disclosures for defined benefit pension plans and other

defined benefit postretirement plans. However, it does not change the measurement or recognition

of those plans as required under SFAS No. 88, "Employers' Accounting for Settlements and

Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits," and SFAS No. 106,

"Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions." Specifically, the

revised Statement requires companies to provide additional disclosures about pension plan assets,

benefit obligations, cash flows, and benefit costs of defined benefit pension plans and other

defined benefit postretirement plans. Also, companies are required to provide a breakdown of plan

assets by category, such as debt, equity and real estate, and to provide certain expected rates

of return and target allocation percentages for these asset categories. The Company has

implemented this pronouncement and has concluded that the adoption has no material impact

to the financial statements.

In December, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") issued Staff Accounting

Bulletin ("SAB") No. 104, "Revenue Recognition." SAB 104 supersedes SAB 11, "Revenue

Recognition in Financial Statements." SAB 104's primary purpose is to rescind accounting

guidance contained in SAB 101 related to multiple element revenue arrangements, superseded

as a result of the issuance of EITF 00-21, "Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple

Deliverables." Additionally, SAB 104 rescinds the SEC's Revenue Recognition in Financial

Statements Frequently Asked Questions and Answers (the FAQ) issued with SAB 101 that had

been codified in SEC Topic, 13, Revenue Recognition. Selected portions of the FAQ have been

incorporated into SAB 104. While the wording of SAB 104 has changed to reflect the issuance

of EITF 00-21, the revenue recognition principles of SAB 101 remain largely unchanged by the

issuance of SAB 104, which was effective upon issuance. The adoption of SAB 104 did not

impact the financial statements.

F-11

US Biodefense, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

In March, 2004, the FASB approved the consensus reached on the Emerging Issues Task Forces

(ETIF) Issue No. 03-1, "The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to

Certain Investments." The objective of this Issue is to provide guidance for identifying impaired

investments. EITF 03-1 also provides new disclosure requirements for investments for investments

are deemed to be temporarily impaired. In September 204, the FASB issued a FASB Staff

Position (FSP) EITF 03-1-1 that delays the effective date of the measurement and recognition

are effective only for annual periods ending after June15,2004. The Company has evaluated the

impact of the adoption of the disclosure requirements of EITF 03-1 and does not believe it will have

an impact to the Company's overall combined results of operations or combined financial position.

Once the FASB reaches a final decision on the measurement and recognition provisions, the

Company will evaluate the impact of the adoption of EITF 03-1.

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151 "Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB

No. 43, Chapter 4 ("SFAS No. 151". The amendments made by SFAS 151 clarify that abnormal

amount of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) should be

recognized as current-period charges and require the allocation of fixed production overheads to

inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The guidance is effective for

inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is

permitted for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after November 23, 2004. The

Company has evaluated the impact of the adoption of SFAS 151, and does not believe the impact

will be significant to the Company's overall results of operations or financial position.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 152, "Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing

Transactions-an amendment of FASB Statements No. 66 and 67" ("SFAS 152") SFAS 152

amends SFAS No. 66, "Accounting for Sales of Real Estate", to reference the financial accounting

and reporting guidance for real estate time-sharing transactions that is provided in AICPA Statement

of Position (SOP) 04-2, "Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions". SFAS 152 also

amends SFAS No. 67, "Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects",

to state that the guidance for (a) incidental operations and (b) costs incurred to sell real estate

projects does not apply to real estate time-sharing transactions. The accounting for those operations

and costs is subject to the guidance in SOP04-2. SFAS 152 is effective for financial statements

for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005, with earlier applications encouraged. The Company

has evaluated the impact of the adoption of SFAS 152, and does not believe the impact will be

significant to the Company's overall results of operations or financial position.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, "Exchanges of Nonmonetary Asset, an

amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions." The amendments

made by SFAS 153 are based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be

measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. Further, the amendments eliminate

the narrow exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replace it with a

broader exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance.

Previously, Opinion 29 required that the accounting for an exchange of a productive asset for a

similar productive asset or an equivalent interest in the same or similar productive asset should be

based on the recorded amount of the asset relinquished. Opinion 29 provided an exception to its

basis measurement principle (fair value) for exchanges of similar productive assets. That exception

required that some nonmonetary exchanges, although commercially substantive, to be recorded on

a carryover basis. By focusing the exception on exchanges that lack commercial substance, the

FASB believes SFAS No. 153 is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal

periods beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for nonmonetary asset

exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after the date of issuance. The provisions of SFAS

No. 153 shall be applied prospectively. The Company has evaluated the impact of the adoption of

SFAS 153, and does not believe the impact will be significant to the Company's overall results of

operations or financial position.

F-12

US Biodefense, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), "Share-Based Payment"

("SFAS 123R"). SFAS 123R will provide investors and other users of financial statements with

more compete and neutral financial information by requiring that the compensation costs relating to

share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements. That cost will be

measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued SFAS 123R covers

a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including share options, restricted

share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights and employee share purchase

plans. SFAS 123R replaces SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", and

supercedes APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees". SFAS 123, as

originally issued in 1995, established as preferable a fair-value-based method of accounting for

share-based payment transactions with employees. However, that statement permitted entities

the option of continuing to apply the guidance in Opinion 25, as long as the footnotes to financial

statements disclosed what net income would have been had the preferable fair-value based method

been used. Public entities (other than those filing as small business issuers) will be required to

apply SFAS 123R as of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005.

The Company has evaluated the impact of the adoption of SFAS 123R and does not believe the

impact will be significant to the Company's overall results of operations or financial position.

In June, 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ('FASB") issued SFAS No. 154, Account-

ing Changes and Error Corrections - a replacement of APB No. 20 and FAS No. 3" ("SFAS No. 154").

SFAS No. 154 provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of accounting changes and

error corrections. It establishes, unless impracticable, retrospective application as the required

method for reporting a change in accounting principle in the absence of explicit transition require-

mints specify to the newly adopted accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 also provides guidance

for determining whether retrospective application of a change in a accounting principle is impractical-

able. The correction of an error in previously issued financial statements is not an accounting

change. However, the reporting of an error correction involves adjustments to previously issued

financial statements similar to those generally applicable to reporting an accounting change retro-

spectively. Therefore, the reporting of a correction of an error by restating previously issued financial

is also addressed by SFAS No. 154. SFAS No. 154 is required to be adopted in fiscal years

beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company does not believe its adoption in fiscal year 2007

will have a material impact on its results of operations or financial position.

In March, 2005, the SEC issued guidance on FASB SFAS 123R, "Share-Based Payments" ("SFAS

No. 123R"). Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 ("SAB 107") was issued to assist preparers by simpli-

fying some of the implementation challenges of SFAS No. 123R while enhancing the information

that investors receive. SAB 107 creates a framework that is premised on two themes: (a) consider-

able judgment will be required by preparers to successfully implement SFAS no. 123R, specifically

when valuing employee stock options; and (b) reasonable individuals, acting in good faith, may

conclude differently on the fair value of employee stock options. Key topics covered by SAB 107

include (a) valuation models - SAB 107 reinforces the flexibility allowed by SFAS No. 123R to

choose an option-pricing model that meets the standard's fair value measurement objective; (b)

expected volatility - SAB 107 provides guidance on when it would be appropriate to rely exclusively

on either historical or implied volatility; and ( c) expected term - the new guidance includes examples

and some simplified approaches to determining the expected term under certain circumstances.

The Company will apply the principles of SAAB 107 in conjunction with its adoption of SOFAS No.

123R.

F-13

US Biodefense, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

In June, 2005, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EAT) issued No. 05-06, "Determining the Abort-

inaction Period of Leasehold Improvements Acquired in a Business Combination" (EAT No. 05-06).

EAT No. 05-06 provides that the amortization period for leasehold improvements acquired in a

business combination or purchased after the inception of a lease to be the shorter of (a) the useful

life of the assets or (b) a term that includes required lease periods and renewals that are reason-

ably assured upon the acquisition of the purchase. The guidance in EAT No. 05-06 will be applied

prospectively and is effective for periods beginning afar June 29, 2005. The Company does not

believe its adoption will have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations or

financial position.

<R>Note 2 - Marketable Securities Available For Sale

On May 11, 2005, the Company entered into an agreement with a Partner. The Company will assist

the Partner in identifying opportunities for commercialization of their listed technologies, while main-

taining the confidentiality of the Partner.

As compensation for providing these services, the Partner gave the Company 5,000,000 shares of

Section 144 stock which is restricted from sale for twelve months from date of issue, May 11, 2005.

The agreement is for a period of twenty four months.

The Company recorded the stock at market price on the acquisition date which was two cents, or

$100,000. The Company recorded revenue for the six month period from May through November,

2005 in the amount of $25,000, with the balance of $75,000 included as deferred revenues on the

Company's balance sheet at November 30, 2005.

The Company has adopted SFAS 130 as required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board.

SFAS 130 requires that securities that are available for sale be presented at market value on the

balance sheet date. Unrealized gains and losses are recognized as a separate component of

stockholders' equity. The specific identification method is used in calculating realized gains and

losses. SFAS 30 also requires a statement of comprehensive income which adjusts net income

for the unrealized activity. At November 30, 2005, the fair market value of common equity securities

with a cost of $100,000 was $150,000. The unrealized gain of $50,000, net of the related income tax

cost of $19,150 is included as a component of other comprehensive income.</R>

Note 3 - Licenses

The Company has agreed to exercise options to license stem cell technology through the University

of British Columbia under two option agreements totaling $20,000.

Having passed the initial validation phase, the Company is working toward a full licensing relation-

ship and will begin pre-clinical analysis of how the cell line can be utilized. The Company is

considering investigating the stem cells applications in combating ALS and Parkinson's disease.

The licenses are for periods of ten to twenty years. The Company will review the licenses at least

annually. When necessary, we record changes for impairments of long-lived assets for the amount

by which the present value of future cash flows, or some other fair value measure, is less than the

carrying value of the respective asset.

Note 4 - Notes Payable (Including Related Parties)

As of November 30, 2005, an officer and director of the Company loaned the Company a total of

$4,313 to pay for general and administrative expenses. The loan bears no interest and is due

upon demand. As of November 30, 2005, the amount owed is $1,812.

F-14

US Biodefense, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 5 - Deferred Revenues (Including Related Parties)

On May 1, 2004, the Company entered into an agreement with Financialnewsusa.com, Inc., to

develop content for its' Biodefense Industry News. Financialnewsusa.com, Inc. is a

related party due to a common officer and director. As of November 30, 2005, $26,667 is reflected

as revenues received in advance and will be amortized ratably over the service period.

The deferred portion of the agreement described in Note 2 totals $75,000 at November 30, 2005.

Note 6 - Illegal Acts

Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended requires that the independent

auditor utilize procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance of detecting illegal acts that

would have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts, and

identify related party transactions that are material to the financial statements or otherwise require

disclosure.

Section 402 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 makes it unlawful for public companies to directly

or indirectly extend or maintain credit, or arrange for the extension of credit to their executive

officers or directors. The scope of the prohibition on personal loans to executive officers and

directors is not clear at this time, and there is little legislative history about Section 402 and the

SEC has not yet issued any interpretive guidance concerning Section 402.

The Company has reviewed all arrangements with their directors and executive officers to determine

if any could fall within the scope of a personal loan. At various times during the year ended

November 30, 2004, the Company advanced loans to its' President. There were three loans which

ranged in amount from $30,000 to $45,000, all were repaid within sixty days, and there were no

loans outstanding at November 30, 2004. The loans were issued to cover the cost of anticipated

business expense and were re-paid timely and promptly. The Company has now established a

clear policy that prohibits directors and executive officers from using advances, and other business

loans for personal purposes.

Note 7 - Comprehensive income

Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenues, expenses, gains and losses be

included in net income. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains

and losses on available for sale securities are reported as a separate component of the equity section

of the balance sheet, such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive income.

The components of other comprehensive income and related tax effects for the year ended November 30,

2005 are unrealized holding gain on available for sale securities, net of tax benefit of $19,150, for a net

comprehensive loss of $30,850.

F-15

US Biodefense, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements

Note 8 - Income Taxes

The income tax provision reflected in the statement of operations consists of the following components
for the year ended November 30, 2005:

Current income taxes payable:
Federal	$ 8,780
State		816
		9,596


Deferred tax expense relating to change in
unrealized gains (losses) on available
for-sale securities:
Federal		17,500
State		1,550
		19,050

The items accounting for the difference between income taxes computed at the federal statutory
rate and the provision for income taxes as follows:
			Impact on
		Amount	Rate
Income tax at federal rate		(12,742)	35.00%
State tax, net of federal effect		815	-2.24%
Permanent differences		70,020	-192.33%
Net operating loss deduction		(48,497)	133.21%

		9,596	-26.36%

Note 9 - Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding during the period.

Note 10 - Related party sales and concentrations

There are two customers that represent 100% of the Company's total revenues for the year
ended November 30, 2005. One of the customers is a related party that represented 84%.
($134,166) of the revenues for the year ended November 30, 2005.

Accounts receivable totaling $20,000 at November 30, 2005 are due from a related party.

Note 11 - Lease Agreement

The Company has negotiated a lease agreement for office space and shared expenses, including
the use of an administrative assistant, office equipment, utilities and parking privileges. The monthly
lease payment is in the amount of $2,000 per month. The lease is on a month to month basis, and
is cancelable upon seven days advance notice. This lease is with a related party.


	F-16

ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

On March 17, 2005, our Board of Directors approved the dismissal of Beckstead and Watts, LLP as our

principal certifying accountants. None of the reports of Beckstead and Watts, LLP on our financial statements

contained any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, or was qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or

accounting principles, except as follows: Beckstead and Watts, LLP’s report on our financial statements as of and for

the year ended November 30, 2003 contained a separate paragraph, stating that:

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going

concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company has had limited operations and have

not commenced planned principal operations. This raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a

going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 3. The financial

statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

During our two most recent fiscal years and during any subsequent interim periods preceding the date of

termination, there were no disagreements with Beckstead and Watts, LLP on any matter of accounting principles or

practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreement(s), if not resolved to

Beckstead and Watts, LLP’s satisfaction, would have caused them to refer to the subject matter of the disagreement(s)

in connection with their report; and there were no "reportable events" as defined in Item 304 (a)(1)(v) of the Securities

and Exchange Commission's Regulation S-K.

While auditing our financial statements for the year ended November 30, 2004, Beckstead and Watts, LLP

notified our management of certain transactions, which may have been made in violation of Section 402 (a) of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Beckstead and Watts, LLP discussed a possible expansion of audit procedures. In

relation to such expanded audit procedures, Beckstead and Watts, LLP proposed a substantial increase in audit fees.

As of March 18, 2005, we subsequently engaged E. Randall Gruber, CPA as our independent accountant for

the fiscal year ending November 30, 2004. During the most recent two fiscal years through March 18, 2005 (the date of

engagement), neither we nor anyone engaged on our behalf has consulted with E. Randall Gruber, CPA regarding: (i)

either the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; or the type of

audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements; or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a

disagreement (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

A Form 8-K has been filed with the Commission regarding this matter.

ITEM 8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We maintain a set of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be

disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within

the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls are also designed with the objective of

ensuring that this information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive

officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based upon their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, David Chin, who serves as our

chief executive officer and chief financial officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are not

effective to ensure that information required to be included in our periodic SEC filings is recorded, processed,

summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms.

Our board of directors was advised by E. Randall Gruber, CPA, PC, our independent registered public

accounting firm, that during their performance of audit procedures for 2005 E. Randall Gruber, CPA, PC identified a

material weakness as defined in Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Standard No. 2 in our internal control

over financial reporting.

-33-

This deficiency consisted primarily of inadequate staffing and supervision that could lead to the untimely
identification and resolution of accounting and disclosure matters and failure to perform timely and effective reviews.
However, our size prevents us from being able to employ sufficient resources to enable us to have adequate segregation
of duties within our internal control system, and resultantly, no change to our internal control over financial reporting
has been made. Our management is required to apply their judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of
possible controls and procedures.

ITEM 8B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS;
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to each of our executive officers or directors.

NAME	AGE		POSITION	PERIOD SERVING	TERM

David Chin	36	President, Treasurer and Director		November 2005-2006	1 year

Cyndi Chen	28	Secretary and Director		November 2005-2006	1 year

Marcia Marcus	57	Director		November 2005-2006	1 year

Footnotes:

(1) Directors hold office until the next annual stockholders’ meeting to be held in 2006 or until a successor or
successors are elected and appointed.

Directors, Executive Officers and Significant Employees

Set forth below are summary descriptions containing the name of our directors and officers, all positions and
offices held with us, the period during which such officer or director has served as such, and the business and
educational experience of each during at least the last five years:

David Chin attended the University of Irvine from 1988 to 1993, studying general education, management and
business. Since 1996 Mr. Chin has successful built a start up company involved with vocation training with $100,000
dollars in revenue in 1996 to $2 million in 2002. Currently Mr. Chin serves as Director, Chairman, President, and CEO
of Camino Real Career School and Financialnewsusa.com.

David Chin’s Business Experience:

2002 – Present: President of Financialnewsusa.com Inc., 13674 E. Valley Blvd, City of Industry, CA
91746
1996 – Present: President and Founder of Camino Real Career School, 13674 E. Valley Blvd., La
Puente, CA 91746.

Cyndi Chen is an immunologist with a Bachelor’s Degree in Biology from the University of California,
Riverside and a Ph.D. in Biological Sciences from the City of Hope Graduate School, Division of Immunology. From
1997-2000, she worked in the University of California, Riverside Departments of Biochemistry and Biomedical
Science. From 1999-2000, Ms. Chen was a Toxicologist Assistant with Bio-Tox Laboratories. Since 2000, she has
been working at the Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Department of Immunology working on isolation and
characterization of GAD-specific T cells in Type 1 Diabetes.

-34-

Marcia Marcus was formerly employed by Care America, an insurance company. She was the administrative

person responsible for the internal control of documentation and compliance with regulation. She has extensive

knowledge with administrative systems and setting up a support team for management. She will be assisting and

coordinating with the directors and officers in their day to day activities.

Board Committees

We currently have no compensation committee or other board committee performing equivalent functions.

Currently, all members of our board of directors participate in discussions concerning executive officer compensation.

Involvement on Certain Material Legal Proceedings During the Last Five Years

No director, officer, significant employee or consultant has been convicted in a criminal proceeding, exclusive

of traffic violations.

No bankruptcy petitions have been filed by or against any business or property of any director, officer,

significant employee or consultant of the Company nor has any bankruptcy petition been filed against a partnership or

business association where these persons were general partners or executive officers.

No director, officer, significant employee or consultant has been permanently or temporarily enjoined, barred,

suspended or otherwise limited from involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities.

No director, officer or significant employee has been convicted of violating a federal or state securities or

commodities law.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Company's directors and

executive officers, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company's equity

securities, to file reports of beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial ownership of the Company's securities with

the SEC on Forms 3 (Initial Statement of Beneficial Ownership), 4 (Statement of Changes of Beneficial Ownership of

Securities) and 5 (Annual Statement of Beneficial Ownership of Securities). Directors, executive officers and beneficial

owners of more than 10% of the Company's Common Stock are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company

with copies of all Section 16(a) forms that they file. Except as otherwise set forth herein, based solely on review of the

copies of such forms furnished to the Company, or written representations that no reports were required, the Company

believes that for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2005 beneficial owners did not comply with Section 16(a) filing

requirements applicable to them to the extent they filed all form required under Section 16(a) in February 2006 and had

no trading activity in 2005.

Code of Ethics

We have not adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our principal executive officer,

principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions in that our

sole officer and director serves in all the above capacities.

ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Remuneration of Directors, Executive Officers and Significant Employees

We do not have employment agreements with our executive officers. We have yet to determine the

appropriate terms needed for the creation of employment agreements for our officers. There has been no discussion

with any of our officers regarding any potential terms of these agreements, nor have such terms been determined with

any specificity. We plan to have these agreements completed by the beginning of the next year. We have no proposal,

understanding or arrangement concerning accrued earnings to be paid in the future.

-35-

Summary Compensation Table

		Annual Compensation				Long-Term Compensation
		----------------------------				-----------------------------------------------------
					Other	Restricted			All
					Annual	Stock	Securities	LTIP	Other
Name and			Salary		Compens	Awards	Underlying	Payouts	Compens
Principal Position		Year	($)	Bonus ($)	ation ($)	($)	Options (#)	($)	ation ($)

David Chin		2005	12,000	0	0	0	0	0	0
President		2004	25,000	0	0	0	0	0	0
and Treasurer		2003	60,000	110,000	0	0	0	0	0

Cyndi Chen		2005	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Secretary

Marcia Marcus		2005	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Director		2004	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

Directors’ Compensation

We have no formal or informal arrangements or agreements to compensate our directors for services they
provide as directors of our company.

Employment Contracts and Officers’ Compensation

We currently do not have any existing employment contracts.

Stock Option Plan And Other Long-term Incentive Plan
We currently do not have existing or proposed option/SAR grants.

ITEM 11.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN SECURITY HOLDERS

Security Ownership of Management and Certain Beneficial Owners

The following table sets forth as of November 30, 2005 certain information regarding the beneficial ownership
of our common stock by:

1.	Each person who is known us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the common stock,

2.	Each of our directors and executive officers and

3.	All of our directors and executive officers as a group.

Except as otherwise indicated, the persons or entities listed below have sole voting and investment power with
respect to all shares of common stock beneficially owned by them, except to the extent such power may be shared with
a spouse. No change in control is currently being contemplated.

-36-

		Name and Address	Amount and Nature	% of
Title of Class		of Beneficial Owner	of Beneficial Owner	Class
Common Stock		David Chin, President	27,292,119	90.1%
		13674 East Valley Boulevard
		City of Industry, California 91746

		Officers and Directors (1)	27,292,119	90.1%


Common Stock		Erin Rahe	3,000,000	9.9%
		1461 Stanford Court
		Santa Ana, California 92705

		Beneficial Owners (1)	3,000,000	9.9%

Footnotes:
(1)	The address of officers and directors in the table is c/o US Biodefense, Inc., 13674 E. Valley Blvd., City of
	Industry, CA 91746.
(2)	Erin Rahe is an independent contractor that may be reached at the offices of US Biodefense.

Change in Control

	No arrangements exist that may result in a change of control of UBDF.

ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

	On October 15, 2005, we entered into an agreement with Financialnewsusa.com, Inc., to develop content for
our Biodefense Industry News. Financialnewsusa.com, Inc. is a related party due to a common officer and director.
The term of the agreement is for six months. Financialewsusa.com, Inc. paid a total of $20,000 for these services upon
execution of the agreement. An additional $20,000 was subsequently paid in January 2006.

	During the year ended November 30, 2005, we shared office space with David Chin, our President. We paid a
total of $36,000 during the year for rent and miscellaneous shared overhead such as a receptionist, various office
equipment and furniture and utilities expense.

	As of November 30, 2005, David Chin loaned us a total of $4,313 to pay for general and administrative
expenses. The loan bears no interest and is due upon demand. As of November 30, 2005, the amount owed is $1,812.

	Office space and services are provided without charge by David Chin, a director and shareholder.

-37-

ITEM 13. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

Exhibit

Number

Name and/or Identification of Exhibit

Articles of Incorporation & By-Laws

Articles of Incorporation of Teal Eyes, Inc. *

Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of Teal Eyes, Inc. *

Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of Terzon Corporation. *

Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Candy Stripers Candy Corp. *

By-Laws of the Company. *

Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation filed May 13, 2003. **

Material Contracts

Consulting Agreement with Shannon S. Eaker, Ph.D. ***

Option Agreement with UCL Biomedica ***

Option Agreement with The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center ***

High Technology & Patent Listing Agreement with Diamond I, Inc.

Option Agreement with The University of British Columbia ***

Consulting Agreement with Financialnewsusa.com, Inc.

***

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications

Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

Incorporated by reference herein filed as en exhibit to Form 10SB12G filed on September 1, 2000.

Incorporated by reference herein filed as Exhibit 3 to Form 10-QSB filed on July 15, 2003.

***

Incorporated by reference herein filed as an exhibit to Form 10-KSB/A filed on August 29, 2006

FORM 8-K

Date Filed

Item(s) Reported

03/18/2005

Items 4.01 and 9.01

Amendments to this 8-K were filed on 04/01/2005 and 04/05/2005

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The following table sets forth fees billed to us by our independent auditors for the year ended November 30,

2004 and November 30, 2003 for (i) services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of

our quarterly financial statements, (ii) services rendered that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or

review of our financial statements that are not reported as Audit Fees, and (iii) services rendered in connection with tax

preparation, compliance, advice and assistance.

SERVICES

2005

2004

Audit fees

$ 7,000.00

Audit-related fees

$ 0

Tax fees

$ 0

All other fees

$ 0

Total fees

$ 7,000.00

-38-

SIGNATURES
<R>
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

US BIODEFENSE, INC.

Signature	Title	Date

/s/ David Chin	Chief Executive Officer and	February 8, 2007
David Chin	President

/s/ David Chin	Treasurer and	February 8, 2007
David Chin	Chief Financial Officer

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of
the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

US BIODEFENSE, INC.

Signature	Title	Date

/s/ David Chin	Chief Executive Officer and	February 20, 2007
David Chin	President

/s/ Cyndi Chen	Director	February 20, 2007
Cyndi Chen

/s/ David Chin	Treasurer and	February 20, 2007
David Chin	Chief Financial Officer

-39-
</R>