Edgar Filing: 1ST CONSTITUTION BANCORP

f32414010k.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013

o TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________ to _______

Commission file Number: 000-32891

1ST CONSTITUTION BANCORP

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

New Jersey		22-3665653
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		IRS Employer Identification Number)

	2650 Route 130, P.O. Box 634, Cranbury, NJ 08512
	(Address of Principal Executive Offices, including Zip Code)

	(609) 655-4500
	(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:

Title of each class

None

Name of each exchange on which registered

None

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:

Common Stock, No Par Value

Stock Purchase Rights Relating to Common Stock, No Par Value

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.

Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company	x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the price at which the common stock was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common stock, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter, is $44,385,349.

As of February 28, 2014, 7,036,087 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

	FORM 10-K

	TABLE OF CONTENTS

	PART I

Item 1.	Business	1
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	13
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	22
Item 2.	Properties	22
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	23
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	23

	PART II

Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	23
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	24
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation	25
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	48
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	48
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	48
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	48
Item 9B.	Other Information	49

	PART III

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	50
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	50
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters	50
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	50
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	50

	PART IV

Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	50

SIGNATURES		55

Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 relating to, without limitation, our future economic performance, plans and objectives for future operations, and projections of revenues and other financial items that are based on our beliefs, as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to us. The words “may,” “will,” “anticipate,” “should,” “would,” “believe,” “contemplate,” “could,” “project,” “predict,” “expect,” “estimate,” “continue,” and “intend,” as well as other similar words and expressions of the future, are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

These forward-looking statements generally relate to our plans, objectives and expectations for future events and include statements about our expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, intentions, assumptions and other statements that are not historical facts. These statements are based upon our opinions and estimates as of the date they are made. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, such forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may be beyond our control, which could cause actual results, performance and achievements to differ materially from results, performance and achievements projected, expected, expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.

Examples of events that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or those anticipated, expressed or implied include, without limitation, changes in the overall economy and interest rate changes; inflation, market and monetary fluctuations; the ability of our customers to repay their obligations; the accuracy of our financial statement estimates and assumptions, including the adequacy of the estimate made in connection with determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses; increased competition and its effect on the availability and pricing of deposits and loans; significant changes in accounting, tax or regulatory practices and requirements; changes in deposit flows, loan demand or real estate values; legislation or regulatory changes, including the Dodd-Frank Act; changes in monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government; changes in loan delinquency rates or in our levels of non-performing assets; our ability to declare and pay dividends; changes in the economic climate in the market areas in which we operate; the frequency and magnitude of foreclosure of our loans; changes in consumer spending and saving habits; the effects of the health and soundness or other financial institutions, including the FDIC’s need to increase the Deposit Insurance Fund assessments; technological changes; the effect of harsh weather conditions, including hurricanes and man-made disasters; the economic impact of any future terrorist threats and attacks, acts of war or threats thereof and the response of the United States to any such threats and attacks; our ability to integrate acquisitions and achieve cost savings; other risks described from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”); and our ability to manage the risks involved in the foregoing. Although management has taken certain steps to mitigate any negative effect of the aforementioned items, significant unfavorable changes could severely impact the assumptions used and have an adverse effect on profitability. Additional information concerning the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements is contained in Item 1. “Business”, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in our other filings with the SEC. However, other factors besides those listed in Item 1A. Risk Factors or discussed in this Annual Report also could adversely affect our results and you should not consider any such list of factors to be a complete list of all potential risks or uncertainties. Any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf speak only as of the date they are made. We undertake no obligation to publicly revise any forward-looking statements or cautionary factors, except as required by law.

PART I

Item 1. Business.

1st Constitution Bancorp

1st Constitution Bancorp (the “Company”) is a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. The Company was organized under the laws of the State of New Jersey in February 1999 for the purpose of acquiring all of the issued and outstanding stock of 1st Constitution Bank (the “Bank”) and thereby enabling the Bank to operate within a bank holding company structure. The Company became an active bank holding company on July 1, 1999. As of December 31, 2013, the Company has two employees, both of whom are full-time. The Bank is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Other than its investment in the Bank, the Company currently conducts no other significant business activities.

Table of Contents

The main office of the Company and the Bank is located at 2650 Route 130 North, Cranbury, New Jersey 08512, and the telephone number is (609) 655-4500.

1st Constitution Bank

The Bank is a commercial bank formed under the laws of the State of New Jersey and engages in the business of commercial and retail banking. As a community bank, the Bank offers a wide range of services (including demand, savings and time deposits and commercial and consumer/installment loans) to individuals, small businesses and not-for-profit organizations principally in the Fort Lee area of Bergen County and in Middlesex, Mercer, Somerset and Monmouth Counties, New Jersey. The Bank conducts its operations through its main office located in Cranbury, New Jersey, and operates eighteen additional branch offices in downtown Cranbury, Hamilton Square, Hightstown, Hillsborough, Hopewell, Jamesburg, Lawrenceville, Perth Amboy, Plainsboro, Skillman, West Windsor, Fort Lee, Princeton, Rumson, Fair Haven, Shrewsbury, Oceanport and Asbury Park, New Jersey. The Bank’s deposits are insured up to applicable legal limits by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). As of February 28, 2014, the Bank had 171 employees, of which 155 were full-time employees.

Management efforts focus on positioning the Bank to meet the financial needs of the communities in Middlesex, Mercer, Somerset and Monmouth Counties and the Fort Lee area of Bergen County and to provide financial services to individuals, families, institutions and small businesses. To achieve this goal, the Bank is focusing its efforts on:

personal service;

expansion of its branch network;

innovative product offerings; and

technological advances and e-commerce.

Expansion of the Bank

On February 7, 2014, the Company and the Bank closed on the merger of Rumson-Fair Haven Bank and Trust Company, a New Jersey state commercial bank (“RFHB”), with and into the Bank, with the Bank continuing as the surviving entity (the “2014 Merger”), pursuant to the terms and conditions of that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated August 14, 2013 and as amended on September 19, 2013 (the “Merger Agreement”), by and between the Company, the Bank and RFHB. As of December 31, 2013, RFHB had approximately $230 million in assets, approximately $149 million in loans and approximately $200 million in deposits. The financial information regarding RFHB is unaudited and is subject to adjustment. RFHB operated five offices in Monmouth County, New Jersey which became branches of the Bank as a result of the 2014 Merger.

Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the 2014 Merger, each share of RFHB common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to such effective time was converted into and became the right to receive, at the election of the holder, either 0.7772 shares of common stock of the Company, $7.50 in cash or a combination of cash and shares of common stock of the Company, subject to proration as described in the Merger Agreement, so that 60% of the aggregate merger consideration consisted of cash and 40% consisted of shares of common stock of the Company. Cash was paid in lieu of fractional shares. In the aggregate, the Company paid approximately $14,770,000 in cash and issued 1,019,242 shares of common stock of the Company as 2014 Merger consideration to RFHB shareholders. Included in the cash and stock consideration amounts were a total of $98,919 that was used to cash out outstanding options to acquire shares of RFHB common stock and 5,829 shares of common stock of the Company that were issued in exchange for restricted stock awards for RFHB common stock. Cash used as consideration in the 2014 Merger was provided by the Bank from existing cash assets.

On March 25, 2011, the Bank acquired certain deposit and other liabilities, real estate and related assets of the Rocky Hill, Hillsborough and Hopewell, New Jersey branch banking offices from another financial institution for a purchase price of $9.85 million (the “March 2011 Acquisition”).

Table of Contents

As a result of the March 2011 Acquisition, the three branches became branches of the Bank. Included in the March 2011 Acquisition were the assumption of deposit liabilities of $111.9 million, primarily consisting of demand deposits, and the acquisition of cash of approximately $101.5 million, fixed assets of approximately $4.6 million, which includes, without limitation, ownership of the real estate and improvements upon which the branches are situated, and loans of $862,000. The Bank recorded goodwill of approximately $3.2 million and a core deposit intangible asset of approximately $1.7 million as a result of the March 2011 Acquisition.

The Bank continually evaluates opportunities for branch bank expansion, either mini-branches or full service branches, to continue to grow and meet the needs of the community.

Personal Service

The Bank provides a wide range of commercial and consumer banking services to individuals, families, institutions and small businesses in central New Jersey and the Fort Lee area of Bergen County. The Bank’s focus is to understand the needs of the community and the customers and tailor products, services and advice to meet those needs. The Bank seeks to provide a high level of personalized banking services, emphasizing quick and flexible responses to customer demands.

Innovative Product Offerings

The Bank’s Mortgage Warehouse Unit provides a revolving line of credit that is available to licensed mortgage banking companies (the “Warehouse Line of Credit”) and that has been successful since inception in 2008. The Warehouse Line of Credit is used by the mortgage banker to originate one-to-four family residential mortgage loans that are pre-sold to the secondary mortgage market, which includes state and national banks, national mortgage banking firms, insurance companies and government-sponsored enterprises, including the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and others. On average, an advance under the Warehouse Line of Credit remains outstanding for a period of less than 30 days, with repayment coming directly from the sale of the loan into the secondary mortgage market. Interest (the spread between our borrowing cost and the rate charged to the client) and a transaction fee are collected by the Bank at the time of repayment. Additionally, customers of the Warehouse Lines of Credit are required to maintain deposit relationships with the Bank that, on average, represent 10% to 15% of the loan balances. The Bank had outstanding Warehouse Line of Credit advances of $116,951,357 at December 31, 2013.

Technological Advances and e-Commerce

The Bank recognizes that customers want to receive service via their most convenient delivery channel, be it the traditional branch office, by telephone, ATM, or the internet. For this reason, the Bank continues to enhance its e-commerce capabilities. At www.1stconstitution.com, customers have easy access to online banking, including account access, and to the Bank’s bill payment system. Consumers can apply online for loans and interact with senior management through the e-mail system. Business customers have access to cash management information and transaction capability through the Bank’s online Cash Manager product which permits business customers to make deposits, originate ACH payments, initiate wire transfers, retrieve account information and place “stop payment” orders. This overall expansion in electronic banking offers the Bank’s customers means to access the Bank’s services easily and at their own convenience.

Competition

The Bank experiences substantial competition in attracting and retaining deposits and in making loans. In attracting deposits and borrowers, the Bank competes with commercial banks, savings banks, and savings and loan associations, as well as regional and national insurance companies and non-bank financial institutions, regulated small loan companies and local credit unions, regional and national issuers of money market funds and corporate and government borrowers. Within the direct market area of the Bank, there are a significant number of offices of competing financial institutions. In New Jersey generally, and in the Bank’s local market specifically, the Bank’s most direct competitors are large commercial banks including Bank of America, PNC Bank, Wells Fargo and Santander Bank, as well as savings banks and savings and loan associations, including Provident Savings Bank and Hudson City Savings Bank.

Table of Contents

The Bank is at a competitive disadvantage compared with these larger national and regional commercial and savings banks. By virtue of their larger capital, asset size or reserves, many of such institutions have substantially greater lending limits (ceilings on the amount of credit a bank may provide to a single customer that are linked to the institution’s capital) and other resources than the Bank. Many such institutions are empowered to offer a wider range of services, including trust services, than the Bank and, in some cases, have lower funding costs (the price a bank must pay for deposits and other borrowed monies used to make loans to customers) than the Bank. In addition to having established deposit bases and loan portfolios, these institutions, particularly large national and regional commercial and savings banks, have the financial ability to finance extensive advertising campaigns and to allocate considerable resources to locations and products perceived as profitable.

In addition, non-bank financial institutions offer services that compete for deposits with the Bank. For example, brokerage firms and insurance companies offer such instruments as short-term money market funds, corporate and government securities funds, mutual funds and annuities. It is expected that competition in these areas will continue to increase. Some of these competitors are not subject to the same degree of regulation and supervision as the Company and the Bank and therefore may be able to offer customers more attractive products than the Bank.

However, management of the Bank believes that loans to small and mid-sized businesses and professionals, which represent the main commercial loan business of the Bank, are not always of primary importance to the larger banking institutions. The Bank competes for this segment of the market by providing responsive personalized services, making timely local decisions, and acquiring knowledge of its customers and their businesses.

Lending Activities

The Bank’s lending activities include both commercial and consumer loans. Loan originations are derived from a number of sources including real estate broker referrals, mortgage loan companies, direct solicitation by the Bank’s loan officers, existing depositors and borrowers, builders, attorneys, walk-in customers and, in some instances, other lenders. The Bank has established disciplined and systematic procedures for approving and monitoring loans that vary depending on the size and nature of the loan.

Commercial Lending

The Bank offers a variety of commercial loan services, including term loans, lines of credit, and loans secured by equipment and receivables. A broad range of short-to-medium term commercial loans, both secured and unsecured, are made available to businesses for working capital (including inventory and receivables), business expansion (including acquisition and development of real estate and improvements), and the purchase of equipment and machinery. The Bank also makes construction loans to real estate developers for the acquisition, development and construction of residential subdivisions.

Commercial loans are granted based on the borrower’s ability to generate cash flow to support its debt obligations and other cash related expenses. A borrower’s ability to repay commercial loans is substantially dependent on the success of the business itself and on the quality of its management. As a general practice, the Bank takes as collateral a security interest in any available real estate, equipment, inventory, receivables or other personal property of its borrowers, although occasionally the Bank makes commercial loans on an unsecured basis. Generally, the Bank requires personal guaranties of its commercial loans to offset the risks associated with such loans.

Residential Consumer Lending

A portion of the Bank’s lending activities consists of the origination of fixed and adjustable rate residential first mortgage loans secured by owner-occupied property located in the Bank’s primary market areas. Home mortgage lending is unique in that a broad geographic territory may be serviced by originators working from strategically placed offices either within the Bank’s traditional banking facilities or from affordable storefront locations in commercial buildings. The Bank also offers construction loans, second mortgage home improvement loans and home equity lines of credit.

The Bank finances the construction of individual, owner-occupied houses on the basis of written underwriting and construction loan management guidelines. First mortgage construction loans are made to contractors and are secured by real estate that is both a pre-sold and a “speculation” basis. Such loans are also made to qualified individual borrowers and are generally supported by a take-out commitment from a permanent lender. The Bank makes residential construction loans to individuals who intend to erect owner occupied housing on a purchased parcel of real estate. The construction phase of these loans has certain risks, including the viability of the contractor, the contractor’s ability to complete the project and changes in interest rates.

Table of Contents

In most cases, the Bank will sell its mortgage loans with terms of 15 years or more in the secondary market. The sale to the secondary market allows the Bank to hedge against the interest rate risks related to such lending operations. This brokerage arrangement allows the Bank to accommodate its clients’ demands while eliminating the interest rate risk for the 15- to 30- year period generally associated with such loans.

The Bank in most cases requires borrowers to obtain and maintain title, fire, and extended casualty insurance, and, where required by applicable regulations, flood insurance. The Bank maintains its own errors and omissions insurance policy to protect against loss in the event of failure of a mortgagor to pay premiums on fire and other hazard insurance policies. Mortgage loans originated by the Bank customarily include a “due on sale” clause, which gives the Bank the right to declare a loan immediately due and payable in certain circumstances, including, without limitation, upon the sale or other disposition by the borrower of the real property subject to a mortgage. In general, the Bank enforces due on sale clauses. Borrowers are typically permitted to refinance or repay loans at their option without penalty.

Non-Residential Consumer Lending

Non-residential consumer loans made by the Bank include loans for automobiles, recreation vehicles, and boats, as well as personal loans (secured and unsecured) and deposit account secured loans. The Bank also conducts various indirect lending activities through established retail companies in its market areas. Non-residential consumer loans are attractive to the Bank because they typically have a shorter term and carry higher interest rates than are charged on other types of loans. Non-residential consumer loans, however, do pose additional risk of collectability when compared to traditional types of loans, such as residential mortgage loans.

Consumer loans are granted based on employment and financial information solicited from prospective borrowers as well as credit records collected from various reporting agencies. The stability of the borrower, willingness to pay and credit history are the primary factors to be considered. The availability of collateral is also a factor considered in making such a loan. The Bank seeks collateral that can be assigned and has good marketability with a clearly adequate margin of value. The geographic area of the borrower is another consideration, with preference given to borrowers in the Bank’s primary market areas.

Supervision and Regulation

Banking is a complex, highly regulated industry. The primary goals of the bank regulatory scheme are to maintain a safe and sound banking system and to facilitate the conduct of monetary policy. In furtherance of those goals, Congress has created several largely autonomous regulatory agencies and enacted a myriad of legislation that governs banks, bank holding companies and the banking industry. This regulatory framework is intended primarily for the protection of depositors and not for the protection of the Company’s shareholders or creditors. Descriptions of, and references to, the statutes and regulations below are brief summaries thereof, and do not purport to be complete. The descriptions are qualified in their entirety by reference to the specific statutes and regulations discussed.

State and Federal Regulations

The Company is a bank holding company within the meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”). As a bank holding company, the Company is subject to inspection, examination and supervision by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”) and is required to file with the Federal Reserve Board an annual report and such additional information as the Federal Reserve Board may require pursuant to the BHCA. The Federal Reserve Board may also make examinations of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company is subject to capital standards similar to, but separate from, those applicable to the Bank.

Under the BHCA, bank holding companies that are not financial holding companies generally may not acquire the ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares, or substantially all of the assets, of any company, including a bank or another bank holding company, without the Federal Reserve Board’s prior approval. The Company has not applied to become a financial holding company but did obtain such approval to acquire the shares of the Bank. A bank holding company that does not qualify as a financial holding company is generally limited in the types of activities in which it may engage to those that the Federal Reserve Board had recognized as permissible for bank holding companies prior to the date of enactment of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999. For example, a holding company and its banking subsidiary are prohibited from engaging in certain tie-in arrangements in connection with any extension of credit or lease or sale of any property or the furnishing of services. At present, the Company does not engage in any significant activity other than owning the Bank.

Table of Contents

In addition to federal bank holding company regulation, the Company is registered as a bank holding company with the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance (the “Department”). The Company is required to file with the Department copies of the reports it files with the federal banking and securities regulators.

The Federal Reserve Board has issued a supervisory letter to bank holding companies that contains guidance on when the board of directors of a bank holding company should eliminate or defer or severely limit dividends including, for example, when net income available for shareholders for the past four quarters net of previously paid dividends paid during that period is not sufficient to fully fund the dividends. The letter also contains guidance on the redemption of stock by bank holding companies which urges bank holding companies to advise the Federal Reserve of any such redemption or repurchase of common stock for cash or other value which results in the net reduction of a bank holding company’s capital at the beginning of the quarter below the capital outstanding at the end of the quarter.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) has a broad impact on the financial services industry, including significant regulatory and compliance requirements, including, among other things, (i) enhanced resolution authority of troubled and failing banks and their holding companies; (ii) increased capital and liquidity requirements; (iii) increased regulatory examination fees; (iv) changes to assessments to be paid to the FDIC for federal deposit insurance; and (v) numerous other provisions designed to improve supervision and oversight of, and strengthen safety and soundness for, the financial services sector. Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Act established a framework for systemic risk oversight within the financial system to be distributed among federal regulatory agencies, including the Financial Stability Oversight Council, the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the FDIC.

Effective in July 2011, the Dodd-Frank Act eliminated federal prohibitions on paying interest on demand deposits, thus allowing businesses to have interest bearing checking accounts. This significant change to existing law has not had an adverse impact on our net interest margin for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.

The Dodd-Frank Act also changed the base for FDIC deposit insurance assessments. Assessments are based on average consolidated total assets less tangible equity capital of a financial institution, rather than on deposits. The Dodd-Frank Act also increased the maximum amount of deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250,000 per account owner, retroactive to January 1, 2008, and non-interest bearing transaction accounts and Interest on Lawyer Trust Accounts (“IOLTAs”) where the accrued interest is paid to state bar associations or other organizations to fund legal assistance programs have unlimited deposit insurance through December 31, 2012. Effective January 1, 2013, non-interest bearing transaction accounts were no longer insured separately from account owners’ other accounts at the same federally insured financial institution. Instead, non-interest bearing transaction accounts are now added to any of an account owner’s other accounts in the applicable ownership category, and the aggregate balance is insured up to $250,000. Effective January 1, 2013, IOLTAs became subject to the $250,000 maximum amount of deposit insurance. If an IOLTA qualifies for pass-through coverage as a fiduciary account, then each separate client for whom a law firm holds funds in such IOLTA may be insured up to $250,000 for his or her funds. The legislation also increased the required minimum reserve ratio for the Deposit Insurance Fund, from 1.15% to 1.35% of insured deposits, and directed the FDIC to offset the effects of increased assessments on depository institutions with less than $10 billion in assets, including the Bank.

The Dodd-Frank Act requires publicly traded companies to give their stockholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation (“say on pay”) and so-called “golden parachute” payments. It also provides that the listing standards of the national securities exchanges shall require listed companies to implement and disclose “clawback” policies mandating the recovery of incentive compensation paid to executive officers in connection with accounting restatements. Such listing standards have yet to be implemented.

The Dodd-Frank Act created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau with broad powers to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has broad rule-making authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks and savings institutions, including the authority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive or abusive” acts and practices. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has examination and enforcement authority over all banks and savings institutions with more than $10 billion in assets, which authority does not extend to the Bank at this time since we do not meet the asset threshold.

Table of Contents

The Dodd-Frank Act also weakens the federal preemption rules that have been applicable for national banks and federal savings associations, and gives state attorneys general the ability to enforce federal consumer protection laws. The Dodd-Frank Act requires minimum leverage (Tier 1) and risk based capital requirements for bank and savings and loan holding companies, which exclude certain instruments that previously have been eligible for inclusion by bank holding companies as Tier 1 capital, such as trust preferred securities; however, bank holding companies with assets of less than $15 billion as of December 31, 2009 are permitted to include trust preferred securities that were issued before May 19, 2010 as Tier 1 capital.

It is difficult to predict at this time what specific impact the Dodd-Frank Act and certain yet to be written implementing rules and regulations will have on community banks. However, it is expected that at a minimum, they will increase our operating and compliance costs and could increase our interest expense.

Capital Adequacy

The Company is required to comply with minimum capital adequacy standards established by the Federal Reserve Board. There are two basic measures of capital adequacy for bank holding companies and the depository institutions that they own: a risk based measure and a leverage measure. All applicable capital standards must be satisfied for a bank holding company to be considered in compliance.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”) required each federal banking agency to revise its risk-based capital standards to ensure that those standards take adequate account of interest rate risk, concentration of credit risk and the risks of non-traditional activities. In addition, pursuant to FDICIA, each federal banking agency has promulgated regulations, specifying the levels at which a bank would be considered “well capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized,” or “critically undercapitalized,” and to take certain mandatory and discretionary supervisory actions based on the capital level of the institution.

The regulations implementing these provisions of FDICIA provide that a bank will be classified as “well capitalized” if it (i) has a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.0 percent, (ii) has a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6.0 percent, (iii) has a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 5.0 percent, and (iv) meets certain other requirements. A bank will be classified as “adequately capitalized” if it (i) has a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 8.0 percent, (ii) has a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 4.0 percent, (iii) has a Tier 1 leverage ratio of (a) at least 4.0 percent, or (b) at least 3.0 percent if the bank was rated 1 in its most recent examination and is not experiencing or anticipating significant growth, and (iv) does not meet the definition of “well capitalized.” A bank will be classified as “undercapitalized” if it (i) has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 8.0 percent, (ii) has a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 4.0 percent, or (iii) has a Tier 1 leverage ratio of (a) less than 4.0 percent, or (b) less than 3.0 percent if the bank was rated 1 in its most recent examination and is not experiencing or anticipating significant growth. A bank will be classified as “significantly undercapitalized” if it (i) has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0 percent, (ii) has a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 3.0 percent, or (iii) has a Tier 1 leverage ratio of less than 3.0 percent. An institution will be classified as “critically undercapitalized” if it has a tangible equity to total assets ratio that is equal to or less than 2.0 percent. An insured depository institution may be deemed to be in a lower capitalization category if the FDIC has determined (i) that the insured depository institution is in unsafe or unsound condition or (ii) that, in the most recent examination of the insured depository institution, the insured depository institution received and has not corrected a less-than-satisfactory rating for any of the categories of asset quality, management, earnings, or liquidity.

As of December 31, 2013, the Bank’s capital ratios exceed the requirements to be considered a “well capitalized” institution under these regulations.

The risk-based capital guidelines for bank holding companies such as the Company currently require a minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets (including off-balance sheet activities, such as standby letters of credit) of 8%. At least half of the total capital is required to be Tier 1 capital, consisting principally of common shareholders’ equity, non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock, a limited amount of cumulative perpetual preferred stock and minority interest in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less goodwill. The remainder of the total capital (Tier 2 capital) may consist of a limited amount of subordinated debt and intermediate-term preferred stock, certain hybrid capital instruments and other debt securities, perpetual preferred stock and a limited amount of the general loan loss allowance. At December 31, 2013, the Company maintained a Tier 1 capital ratio of 18.04% and total qualifying capital ratio of 19.29%.

Table of Contents

In addition to the risk-based capital guidelines, the federal banking regulators established minimum leverage ratio (Tier 1 capital to total assets) guidelines for bank holding companies. These guidelines provide for a minimum leverage ratio of 3% for those bank holding companies which have the highest regulatory examination ratings and are not contemplating or experiencing significant growth or expansion. All other bank holding companies are required to maintain a leverage ratio of at least 4%. Banking organizations with supervisory, financial, operational, or managerial weaknesses, as well as organizations that are anticipating or experiencing significant growth, are expected to maintain capital ratios well above the minimum levels. Moreover, higher capital ratios may be required for any bank holding company if warranted by its particular circumstances or risk profile. In all cases, bank holding companies should hold capital commensurate with the level and nature of the risks, including the volume and severity of problem loans, to which they are exposed. At December 31, 2013, the Company’s leverage ratio was 10.82%.

The current risk-based capital guidelines are based upon the 1988 capital accord of the International Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, a committee of central banks and bank supervisors and regulators from the major industrialized countries that develops broad policy guidelines for use by each country’s supervisors in determining the supervisory policies they apply. A new international accord, referred to as Basel II, became mandatory for large or “core” international banks outside the U.S. in 2008 (total assets of $250 billion or more or consolidated foreign exposures of $10 billion or more) and emphasizes internal assessment of credit, market and operational risk, as well as supervisory assessment and market discipline in determining minimum capital requirements. It is optional for other banks. In December 2010, the Group of Governors and Heads of Supervisors of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the oversight body of the Basel Committee, published its “calibrated” capital standards for major banking institutions, referred to as Basel III. Under these standards, when fully phased-in on January 1, 2019, banking institutions will be required to maintain heightened Tier 1 common equity, Tier 1 capital, and total capital ratios, as well as maintaining a “capital conservation buffer.” The Tier 1 common equity and Tier 1 capital ratio requirements will be phased-in incrementally between January 1, 2013 and January 1, 2015; the deductions from common equity made in calculating Tier 1 common equity will be phased-in incrementally over a four-year period commencing on January 1, 2014; and the capital conservation buffer will be phased-in incrementally between January 1, 2016 and January 1, 2019. The Basel Committee also announced that a countercyclical buffer of 0% to 2.5% of common equity or other fully loss-absorbing capital will be implemented according to national circumstances as an extension of the conservation buffer.

In July 2013, the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC approved revisions to their capital adequacy guidelines and prompt corrective action rules that implement the revised standards of Basel III and address relevant provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. The Federal Reserve Board’s final rules and the FDIC’s interim final rules apply to all depository institutions, top-tier bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $500 million or more, and top-tier savings and loan holding companies (“banking organizations”). Among other things, the rules establish a new common equity Tier 1 minimum capital requirement (4.5% of risk-weighted assets) and increase the minimum Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets requirement (from 4% to 6% of risk-weighted assets). Banking organizations will also be required to have a total capital ratio of 8% (unchanged from current rules) and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4% (unchanged from current rules). The rules also limit a banking organization’s ability to pay dividends, engage in share repurchases or pay discretionary bonuses if the banking organization does not hold a “capital conservation buffer” consisting of 2.5% of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets in addition to the amount necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital requirements. The rules become effective for the Company and the Bank on January 1, 2015. The capital conservation buffer requirement will be phased in beginning in January 1, 2016 at 0.625% of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and would increase by that amount each year until fully implemented in January 2019 at 2.5% of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets. Management is currently evaluating the provisions of these rules and their expected impact on the Company and the Bank.

On May 30, 2006, the Company established 1st Constitution Capital Trust II, a Delaware business trust and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Trust II”), for the sole purpose of issuing $18 million of trust preferred securities (the “Capital Securities”). Trust II utilized the $18 million proceeds along with $557,000 invested in Trust II by the Company to purchase $18,557,000 of floating rate junior subordinated debentures issued by the Company and due to mature on June 15, 2036. The Capital Securities were issued in connection with a pooled offering involving approximately 50 other financial institution holding companies. All of the Capital Securities were sold to a single pooling vehicle. The floating rate junior subordinated debentures are the only asset of Trust II and have terms that mirror the Capital Securities. These debentures are redeemable in whole or in part prior to maturity after June 15, 2011. Trust II is obligated to distribute all proceeds of a redemption of these debentures, whether voluntary or upon maturity, to holders of the Capital Securities. The Company’s obligation with respect to the Capital Securities and the debentures, when taken together, provide a full and unconditional guarantee on a subordinated basis by the Company of the obligations of Trust II to pay amounts when due on the Capital Securities. Interest payments on the floating rate junior subordinated debentures flow through Trust II to the pooling vehicle.

Table of Contents

The Company issued a warrant on December 23, 2008 to the United States Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”) under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”) Capital Purchase Program (the “CPP”). This warrant was sold by the Treasury on November 23, 2011 and exchanged for two warrants which permit the holders thereof to acquire, on an adjusted basis resulting from declarations of stock dividends to holders of common stock since the issuance of the two warrants, 255,540 shares of common stock of the Company at a price of $7.044 per share.

Certain terms and conditions of the warrant issued to the Treasury were modified or deleted in the two new warrants, including, without limitation, the deletion of the anti-dilution provision upon certain issuances of the Company’s common stock at or below a specified price relative to the initial exercise price. However, the two warrants still provide for the adjustment of the exercise price and the number of shares of the Company’s common stock issuable upon exercise pursuant to customary anti-dilution provisions, such as upon stock splits or distributions of securities or other assets to holders of the Company’s common stock. The two warrants remain outstanding, are immediately exercisable and continue to have an expiration date of December 23, 2018, which was the expiration date of the warrant originally issued to the Treasury.

The two warrants qualify and are accounted for as permanent equity on the Company’s balance sheet.

Restrictions on Dividends

The primary source of cash to pay dividends, if any, to the Company’s shareholders and to meet the Company’s obligations is dividends paid to the Company by the Bank. Dividend payments by the Bank to the Company are subject to the New Jersey Banking Act of 1948 (the “Banking Act”) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (the “FDIA”). Under the Banking Act and the FDIA, the Bank may not pay any dividends if after paying the dividend, it would be undercapitalized under applicable capital requirements. In addition to these explicit limitations, the federal regulatory agencies are authorized to prohibit a banking subsidiary or bank holding company from engaging in an unsafe or unsound banking practice. Depending upon the circumstances, the agencies could take the position that paying a dividend would constitute an unsafe or unsound banking practice.

It is the policy of the Federal Reserve Board that bank holding companies should pay cash dividends on common stock only out of income available over the immediately preceding year and only if prospective earnings retention is consistent with the organization’s expected future needs and financial condition. The policy provides that bank holding companies should not maintain a level of cash dividend that undermines the bank holding company’s ability to serve as a source of strength to its banking subsidiary. A bank holding company may not pay dividends when it is insolvent.

The Company has never paid a cash dividend and the Company’s Board of Directors has no plans to pay a cash dividend in the foreseeable future.

Priority on Liquidation

The Company is a legal entity separate and distinct from the Bank. The rights of the Company as the sole shareholder of the Bank, and therefore the rights of the Company’s creditors and shareholders, to participate in the distributions and earnings of the Bank when the Bank is not in bankruptcy, are subject to various state and federal law restrictions as discussed above under the heading “Restrictions on Dividends.” In the event of a liquidation or other resolution of an insured depository institution such as the Bank, the claims of depositors and other general or subordinated creditors are entitled to a priority of payment over the claims of holders of an obligation of the institution to its shareholders (the Company) or any shareholder or creditor of the Company. The claims on the Bank by creditors include obligations in respect of federal funds purchased and certain other borrowings, as well as deposit liabilities.

Table of Contents

Financial Institution Legislation

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Modernization Act of 1999 (the “Modernization Act”) became effective in early 2000. The Modernization Act:

allows bank holding companies meeting management, capital and Community Reinvestment Act standards to engage in a substantially broader range of non-banking activities than is permissible for a bank holding company, including insurance underwriting and making merchant banking investments in commercial and financial companies; if a bank holding company elects to become a financial holding company, it files a certification, effective in 30 days, and thereafter may engage in certain financial activities without further approvals;

allows banks to establish subsidiaries to engage in certain activities which a financial holding company could engage in, if the bank meets certain management, capital and Community Reinvestment Act standards;

allows insurers and other financial services companies to acquire banks and removes various restrictions that currently apply to bank holding company ownership of securities firms and mutual fund advisory companies; and establishes the overall regulatory structure applicable to financial holding companies that also engage in insurance and securities operations.

The Modernization Act modified other laws, including laws related to financial privacy and community reinvestment.

The Modernization Act also amended the BHCA and the Bank Merger Act to require the federal banking agencies to consider the effectiveness of a financial institution’s anti-money laundering activities when reviewing an application under these acts.

Additional proposals to change the laws and regulations governing the banking and financial services industry are frequently introduced in Congress, in state legislatures and before the various bank regulatory agencies. The likelihood and timing of any such changes and the impact such changes might have on the Company cannot be determined at this time.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), which became law on July 30, 2002, added new legal requirements affecting corporate governance, accounting and corporate reporting for companies with publicly traded securities.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act provides for, among other things:

a prohibition on personal loans made or arranged by the issuer to its directors and executive officers (except for loans made by a bank subject to Regulation O of the Federal Reserve Board);

independence requirements for audit committee members;

disclosure of whether at least one member of the audit committee is a “financial expert” (as such term is defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and if not, why not;

independence requirements for outside auditors;

a prohibition by a company’s registered public accounting firm from performing statutorily mandated audit services for the company if the company’s chief executive officer, chief financial officer, comptroller, chief accounting officer or any person serving in equivalent positions had been employed by such firm and participated in the audit of such company during the one-year period preceding the audit initiation date;

certification of financial statements and annual and quarterly reports by the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer;

Table of Contents

the forfeiture of bonuses or other incentive-based compensation and profits from the sale of an issuer’s securities by directors and senior officers in the twelve month period following initial publication of any financial statements that later require restatement due to corporate misconduct;

disclosure of off-balance sheet transactions;

two-business day filing requirements for insiders filing Forms 4;

disclosure of a code of ethics for financial officers and filing a Form 8-K for a change or waiver of such code;

“real time” filing of periodic reports;

posting of certain SEC filings and other information on the company’s website;

the reporting of securities violations “up the ladder” by both in-house and outside attorneys;

restrictions on the use of non-GAAP financial measures;

the formation of a public accounting oversight board; and

various increased criminal penalties for violations of securities laws.

Additionally, Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that a public company subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), include in its annual report (i) a management’s report on internal control over financial reporting assessing the company’s internal controls, and (ii) if the company is an “accelerated filer” or a “large accelerated filer”, an auditor’s attestation report, completed by the registered public accounting firm that prepares or issues an accountant’s report which is included in the company’s annual report, attesting to the effectiveness of management’s internal control assessment.

Each of the national stock exchanges, including the Nasdaq Global Market where the Company’s common stock is listed, have in place corporate governance rules, including rules requiring director independence, and the adoption of charters for the nominating, corporate governance, and audit committees. These rules are intended to, among other things, make the board of directors independent of management and allow shareholders to more easily and efficiently monitor the performance of companies and directors. These burdens increase the Company’s legal and accounting fees and the amount of time that the Board of Directors and management must devote to corporate governance issues.

Section 302(a) of Sarbanes-Oxley requires the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer to certify that the Company’s Quarterly and Annual Reports do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. The rules have several requirements, including having these officers certify that: they are responsible for establishing, maintaining and regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting; they have made certain disclosures to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Board of Directors about the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and they have included information in the Company’s Quarterly and Annual Reports about their evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures and whether there have been significant changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

As part of the USA Patriot Act, signed into law on October 26, 2001, Congress adopted the International Money Laundering Abatement and Financial Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001 (the “Act”). The Act authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the heads of other government agencies, to adopt special measures applicable to financial institutions such as banks, bank holding companies, broker-dealers and insurance companies. Among its other provisions, the Act requires each financial institution: (i) to establish an anti-money laundering program; (ii) to establish due diligence policies, procedures and controls that are reasonably designed to detect and report instances of money laundering in United States private banking accounts and correspondent accounts maintained for non-United States persons or their representatives; and (iii) to avoid establishing, maintaining, administering, or managing correspondent accounts in the United States for, or on behalf of, a foreign shell bank that does not have a physical presence in any country. In addition, the Act expands the circumstances under which funds in a bank account may be forfeited and requires covered financial institutions to respond under certain circumstances to requests for information from federal banking agencies within 120 hours.

Table of Contents

The Department of Treasury has issued regulations implementing the due diligence requirements. These regulations require minimum standards to verify customer identity and maintain accurate records, encourage cooperation among financial institutions, federal banking agencies, and law enforcement authorities regarding possible money laundering or terrorist activities, prohibit the anonymous use of “concentration accounts,” and require all covered financial institutions to have in place an anti-money laundering compliance program.

As a New Jersey-chartered commercial bank, the Bank is subject to supervision and examination by the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance. The Bank is also subject to regulation and examination by the FDIC, which is its principal federal bank regulator.

The Bank must comply with various requirements and restrictions under federal and state law, including the maintenance of reserves against deposits, restrictions on the types and amounts of loans that may be granted and the interest that may be charged thereon, limitations on the types of investments that may be made and the services that may be offered, and restrictions on dividends as described in the preceding section. Consumer laws and regulations also affect the operations of the Bank. In addition to the impact of regulation, commercial banks are affected significantly by the actions of the Federal Reserve Board which influence the money supply and credit availability in the national economy.

Community Reinvestment Act

Under the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”), as implemented by FDIC regulations, a bank has a continuing and affirmative obligation, consistent with its safe and sound operation, to help meet the credit needs of its entire community, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions nor does it limit an institution’s discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community, consistent with CRA. CRA requires the FDIC to assess an institution’s record of meeting the credit needs of its community and to take such record into account in its evaluation of certain applications by the applicable institution. The CRA requires public disclosure of an institution’s CRA rating and requires that the FDIC provide a written evaluation of an institution’s CRA performance utilizing a four-tiered descriptive rating system. An institution’s CRA rating is considered in determining whether to grant charters, branches and other deposit facilities, relocations, mergers, consolidations and acquisitions. Performance less than satisfactory may be the basis for denying an application. At its last CRA examination, the Bank was rated “satisfactory” under CRA.

FIRREA

Under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”), a depository institution insured by the FDIC can be held liable for any loss incurred by, or reasonably expected to be incurred by, the FDIC in connection with (i) the default of a commonly controlled FDIC-insured depository institution or (ii) any assistance provided by the FDIC to a commonly controlled FDIC-insured depository institution in danger of default. These provisions have commonly been referred to as FIRREA’s “cross guarantee” provisions. Further, under FIRREA, the failure to meet capital guidelines could subject a bank to a variety of enforcement remedies available to federal regulatory authorities.

FIRREA also imposes certain independent appraisal requirements upon a bank’s real estate lending activities and further imposes certain loan-to-value restrictions on a bank’s real estate lending activities. The bank regulators have promulgated regulations in these areas.

Insurance of Deposits

The Bank’s deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund of the FDIC. This limit is $250,000 per account owner. The FDICIA is applicable to depository institutions and deposit insurance. The FDICIA requires the FDIC to establish a risk-based assessment system for all insured depository institutions. Under this legislation, the FDIC is required to establish an insurance premium assessment system based upon: (i) the probability that the insurance fund will incur a loss with respect to the institution, (ii) the likely amount of the loss, and (iii) the revenue needs of the insurance fund. In compliance with this mandate, the FDIC has developed a matrix that sets the assessment premium for a particular institution in accordance with its capital level and overall rating by the primary regulator. Under the matrix as currently in effect, the assessment rate ranges from 0 to 27 basis points of assessed deposits.

Table of Contents

In February 2011, the FDIC adopted final rules to implement changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act with respect to the FDIC assessment rules. In particular, the definition of an institution's deposit insurance assessment base was changed from total deposits to total assets less tangible equity. In addition, the FDIC revised the deposit insurance assessment rates down. The changes were effective April 1, 2011. The new initial base assessment rates range from 5 to 9 basis points for Risk Category I banks to 35 basis points for Risk Category IV banks. Risk Category II and III banks will have an initial base assessment rate of 14 or 23 basis points, respectively. The new rates and assessment base have reduced our current FDIC insurance assessment for 2013 compared to 2012. However, if the risk category of the Bank changes adversely, our FDIC insurance premiums could increase.

Lending Limits

In January 2013, the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance issued an order requiring a New Jersey chartered bank’s calculation of lending limits to any person or entity to include credit exposure to such person or entity arising from a derivative transaction, repurchase agreement, reverse repurchase agreement, securities lending transaction or securities borrowing transaction. Previously, such credit exposure was not included in a New Jersey chartered bank’s calculation of lending limits. New Jersey chartered banks had until July 1, 2013 to comply with the operative provisions of the order, which include compliance with all of the rules set forth in the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s Interim Final Rule on Lending Limits (codified at 12 C.F.R pts. 32, 159 and 160). This change in the calculation of lending limits did not have a significant impact on the Bank’s operations.

Volcker Rule

On December 10, 2013, the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the FDIC, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the SEC issued final rules to implement the Volcker Rule contained in section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Act, generally to become effective on July 21, 2015. The Volcker Rule prohibits an insured depository institution and its affiliates from: (i) engaging in “proprietary trading” and (ii) investing in or sponsoring certain types of funds (defined as “Covered Funds”) subject to certain limited exceptions. The rule also effectively prohibits short-term trading strategies by any U.S. banking entity if those strategies involve instruments other than those specifically permitted for trading and prohibits the use of some hedging strategies. The Company identified no investments held as of December 31, 2013 that meet the definition of Covered Funds and that are required to be divested by July 21, 2015 under the foregoing rules.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

The following are some important factors that could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those referred to or implied in any forward-looking statement. These are in addition to the risks and uncertainties discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Company’s other filings with the SEC.

A prolonging of the economic downturn or the return of negative developments in the financial services industry could negatively impact our operations.

The global and U.S. economic downturn has resulted in uncertainty in the financial markets in general with the possibility of a slow recovery or a fall back into recession. The Federal Reserve, in an attempt to help the overall economy, has kept interest rates low through its targeted federal funds rate, the purchase of mortgage- backed securities and the purchase of Treasury securities. If the Federal Reserve increases the federal funds rate, overall interest rates will likely rise which may negatively impact the housing markets and the U.S. economic recovery. A prolonging of the economic downturn or the return of negative developments in the financial services industry could negatively impact our operations by causing an increase in our provision for loan losses and a deterioration of our loan portfolio. Such a downturn may also adversely affect our ability to originate or sell loans. The occurrence of any of these events could have an adverse impact on our financial performance.

A prolonging or worsening of the downturn affecting the economy and/or the real estate market in our primary market area would adversely affect our loan portfolio and our growth potential.

Table of Contents

Much of the Company’s lending is in northern and central New Jersey. As a result of this geographic concentration, a further continued significant broad-based deterioration in economic conditions in the New Jersey metropolitan area could have a material adverse impact on the quality of the Company’s loan portfolio, results of operations and future growth potential. A prolonged decline in economic conditions in our market area could restrict borrowers’ ability to pay outstanding principal and interest on loans when due, and consequently, adversely affect the cash flows and results of operation of the Company’s business.

The Company’s loan portfolio is largely secured by real estate collateral located in the State of New Jersey. Conditions in the real estate markets in which the collateral for the Company’s loans are located strongly influence the level of the Company’s non-performing loans and results of operations. A continued decline in the New Jersey real estate markets could adversely affect the Company’s loan portfolio. Decreases in local real estate values would adversely affect the value of property used as collateral for the Company’s loans. Adverse changes in the economy also may have a negative effect on the ability of our borrowers to make timely repayments of their loans, which would have an adverse impact on our earnings.

The Company faces significant competition.

The Company faces significant competition from many other banks, savings institutions and other financial institutions which have branch offices or otherwise operate in the Company’s market area. Non-bank financial institutions, such as securities brokerage firms, insurance companies and money market funds, engage in activities which compete directly with traditional bank business, which has also led to greater competition. Many of these competitors have substantially greater financial resources than the Company, including larger capital bases that allow them to attract customers seeking larger loans than the Company is able to accommodate and the ability to aggressively advertise their products and to allocate considerable resources to locations and products perceived as profitable. There can be no assurance that the Company and the Bank will be able to successfully compete with these entities in the future.

The Company is subject to interest rate risk.

The Company’s earnings are largely dependent upon its net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income earned on interest-earning assets such as loans and securities and interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities such as deposits and borrowed funds. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond the Company’s control, including general economic conditions and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies and, in particular, the Federal Reserve Board. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, could influence not only the interest the Company receives on loans and securities and the amount of interest it pays on deposits and borrowings, but such changes could also affect (i) the Company’s ability to originate loans and obtain deposits, (ii) the fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, and (iii) the average duration of the Company’s mortgage-backed securities portfolio. If the spread between the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings and the interest rates received on loans and other investments narrows, the Company’s net interest income, and therefore earnings, could be adversely affected. This also includes the risk that interest-earning assets may be more responsive to changes in interest rates than interest-bearing liabilities, or vice versa (repricing risk), the risk that the individual interest rates or rate indices underlying various interest-earning assets and interest bearing liabilities may not change in the same degree over a given time period (basis risk), and the risk of changing interest rate relationships across the spectrum of interest-earning asset and interest-bearing liability maturities (yield curve risk).

Although management believes it has implemented effective asset and liability management strategies to reduce the potential effects of changes in interest rates on the Company’s results of operations, any substantial, unexpected, prolonged change in market interest rates could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Historically low interest rates may adversely affect our net interest income and profitability.

During the last five years, it has been the policy of the Federal Reserve Board to maintain interest rates at historically low levels through its targeted federal funds rate and the purchase of mortgage-backed securities and Treasury securities. As a result, yields have been at levels lower than were available prior to 2008 on securities we have purchased and loans we have originated. Consequently, the average yield on our interest-earning assets has decreased during the low interest rate environment. As a general matter, our interest-bearing liabilities re-price or mature more quickly than our interest-earning assets, which have contributed to increases in net interest income (the difference between interest income earned on assets and interest expense paid on liabilities) in the short term. However, our ability to lower our interest expense is limited at these interest rate levels, while the average yield on our interest-earning assets may continue to decrease. The Federal Reserve Board has indicated its intention to maintain low interest rates in the near future. Accordingly, our net interest income may decrease, which may have an adverse effect on our profitability.

Table of Contents

The Company is subject to risks associated with speculative construction lending.

The risks associated with speculative construction lending include the borrower’s inability to complete the construction process on time and within budget, the sale of the project within projected absorption periods, the economic risks associated with real estate collateral, and the potential of a rising interest rate environment. Such loans may include financing the development and/or construction of residential subdivisions. This activity may involve financing land purchase, infrastructure development (i.e. roads, utilities, etc.), as well as construction of residences or multi-family dwellings for subsequent sale by developer/builder. Because the sale of developed properties is integral to the success of developer business, loan repayment may be especially subject to the volatility of real estate market values. Management has established underwriting and monitoring criteria to minimize the inherent risks of speculative commercial real estate construction lending. Further, management concentrates lending efforts with developers demonstrating successful performance on marketable projects within the Bank’s lending areas.

Our mortgage warehouse lending business represents a significant portion of our overall lending activity and is subject to numerous risks.

Our primary lending emphasis is the origination of commercial and commercial real estate loans and mortgage warehouse lines of credit. Based on the composition of our loan portfolio, the inherent primary risks are deteriorating credit quality, a decline in the economy, and a decline in New Jersey real estate market values. Any one, or a combination, of these events may adversely affect the loan portfolio and may result in increased delinquencies, loan losses and increased future provision levels.

A significant portion of our loan portfolio consists of the mortgage warehouse lines of credit. Risks associated with these loans include, without limitation, (i) credit risks relating to the mortgage bankers that borrow from us, (ii) the risk of intentional misrepresentation or fraud by any of such mortgage bankers, (iii) changes in the market value of mortgage loans originated by the mortgage banker, the sale of which is the expected source of repayment of the borrowings under a warehouse line of credit, due to changes in interest rates during the time in warehouse, or (iv) unsalable or impaired mortgage loans so originated, which could lead to decreased collateral value and the failure of a purchaser of the mortgage loan to purchase the loan from the mortgage banker.

The impact of interest rates on our mortgage warehouse business can be significant. Changes in interest rates can impact the number of residential mortgages originated and initially funded under mortgage warehouse lines of credit and thus our mortgage warehouse related revenues. A decline in mortgage rates generally increases the demand for mortgage loans. Conversely, in a constant or increasing rate environment, we would expect fewer loans to be originated. Although we use models to assess the impact of interest rates on mortgage related revenues, the estimates of net income produced by these models are dependent on estimates and assumptions of future loan demand, prepayment speeds and other factors which may overstate or understate actual subsequent experience. Further, the concentration of our loan portfolio on loans originated through our mortgage warehouse business increases the risk associated with our loan portfolio because of the concentration of loans in a single line of business, namely one-to-four family residential mortgage lending, and in a particular segment of that business, namely mortgage warehouse lending.

If our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, our earnings could decrease.

We make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of many of our loans. In determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses, we review our loans and our loan and delinquency experience, and we evaluate economic conditions. If our assumptions are incorrect, our allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover losses inherent in our loan portfolio, resulting in additions to our allowance. Material additions to our allowance would materially decrease our net income.

Table of Contents

In addition, bank regulators periodically review our loan portfolio and our allowance for loan losses and may require us to increase our provision for loan losses or recognize further loan charge-offs or reclassify loans. Any increase in our allowance for loan losses or loan charge-offs or loan reclassifications as required by these regulatory authorities might have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

If we do not successfully integrate RFHB and any other banks that we may acquire in the future, the combined bank may be adversely affected.

As a result of the recent consummation of the merger of RFHB with and into the Bank, we will need to integrate RFHB into our existing business and systems. If we make additional acquisitions in the future, we will need to integrate those acquired entities into our existing business and systems. We may experience difficulties in accomplishing this integration or in effectively managing the combined bank after the merger with RFHB or after any future acquisition. The integration of RFHB or any other acquired entity will also divert the attention of our management. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in integrating RFHB into our own business or integrating any future acquisitions into our own business.

The expected benefits of the 2014 Merger may not be realized if the combined bank does not achieve certain cost savings and other benefits.

Our belief that cost savings and revenue enhancements are achievable is a forward-looking statement that is inherently uncertain. The combined bank’s actual cost savings and revenue enhancements, if any, cannot be quantified at this time. Any actual cost savings or revenue enhancements will depend on future expense levels and operating results, the timing of certain events and general industry, regulatory and business conditions. Many of these events will be beyond the control of the combined bank.

Federal and state government regulation impacts the Company’s operations.

The operations of the Company and the Bank are heavily regulated and will be affected by present and future legislation and by the policies established from time to time by various federal and state regulatory authorities. In particular, the monetary policies of the Federal Reserve Board have had a significant effect on the operating results of banks in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future. Among the instruments of monetary policy used by the Federal Reserve Board to implement its objectives are changes in the discount rate charged on bank borrowings. It is not possible to predict what changes, if any, will be made to the monetary policies of the Federal Reserve Board or to existing federal and state legislation or the effect that such changes may have on the future business and earnings prospects of the Company.

The Company and the Bank are subject to examination, supervision and comprehensive regulation by various federal and state agencies. Compliance with the rules and regulations of these agencies may be costly and may limit growth and restrict certain activities, including payment of dividends, investments, loans and interest rate charges, interest rates paid on deposits, and locations of offices. The Bank is also subject to capitalization guidelines set forth in federal legislation and regulations.

The laws and regulations applicable to the banking industry could change at any time, and we cannot predict the impact of these changes on our business and profitability. Because government regulation greatly affects the business and financial results of all commercial banks and bank holding companies, the cost of compliance could adversely affect the Company’s result of operations.

Legislative and regulatory reforms may materially adversely impact our financial condition, results of operation, liquidity, or stock price.

The Dodd-Frank Act restructures the regulation of depository institutions. The Dodd-Frank Act contains various provisions designed to enhance the regulation of depository institutions and prevent the recurrence of a financial crisis such as occurred in 2008-2009. Also included was the creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a new federal agency administering consumer and fair lending laws, a function that was previously performed by the depository institution regulators. The federal preemption of state laws currently accorded federally chartered depository institutions has been reduced as well. We expect that many of the requirements called for in the Dodd-Frank Act will be implemented over time, and most will be subject to implementing regulations over the course of several years. Given the uncertainty associated with the manner in which the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act will be implemented by the various regulatory agencies and through regulations, the full extent of the impact such requirements will have on financial institutions’ operations is unclear. The changes resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act may impact the profitability of our business activities, require changes to certain of our business practices, impose upon us more stringent capital, liquidity and leverage ratio requirements or otherwise adversely affect our business. These changes may also require us to invest significant management attention and resources to evaluate and make necessary changes in order to comply with new statutory and regulatory requirements.

Table of Contents

In addition, international banking industry regulators have largely agreed upon significant changes in the regulation of capital required to be held by banks and their holding companies to support their businesses. The new international rules, known as Basel III, generally increase the capital required to be held and narrow the types of instruments which will qualify as providing appropriate capital and impose a new liquidity measurement. The Basel III requirements are complex and will be phased in over many years.

The Basel III rules do not apply to U.S. banks or holding companies automatically. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act requires U.S. regulators to reform the system under which the safety and soundness of banks and other financial institutions, individually and systemically, are regulated. That reform effort will include the regulation of capital and liquidity.

On July 2, 2013, the Federal Reserve approved a final rule (the “Final Rule”) to establish a new comprehensive regulatory capital framework for all U.S. banking organizations. On July 9, 2013, the Final Rule was approved as an interim final rule by the FDIC. These new requirements establish the following minimum capital ratios: (1) a common equity Tier 1 (“CET1”) capital ratio of 4.5% of risk-weighted assets; (2) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.0% of risk-weighted assets; (3) a total capital ratio of 8.0% of risk-weighted assets; and (4) a leverage ratio of 4.0%. In addition, there is a new requirement to maintain a capital conservation buffer, comprised of CET1 capital, in an amount greater than 2.5% of risk-weighted assets over the minimum capital required by each of the minimum risk-based capital ratios in order to avoid limitations on the organization’s ability to pay dividends, repurchase shares or pay discretionary bonuses. The capital conservation buffer requirement will be phased in, beginning January 1, 2016, and initially require a buffer amount greater than 0.625% during 2016 in order to avoid these limitations. Following 2016, the required amount of the capital conservation buffer will continue to increase each year until January 1, 2019 when the buffer amount must be greater than 2.5% in order to avoid the above limitations.

The new regulations also change what qualifies as capital for purposes of meeting these various capital requirements, as well as the risk weight of certain assets for purposes of the risk-based capital ratios.

Under the new regulations, in order to be considered well-capitalized for prompt corrective action purposes, the Bank will be required to maintain the following ratios: (1) a CET1 ratio of at least 6.5% of risk-weighted assets; (2) a Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 8.0% of risk weighted assets; (3) a total capital ratio of a least 10.0% of risk-weighted assets; and (4) a leverage ratio of at least 5.0%.

The application of these more stringent capital requirements could increase the Company’s cost of capital, among other things. Any permanent significant increase in the Company’s cost of capital could have significant adverse impacts on the profitability of many of our products, the types of products we could offer profitably, our overall profitability, and our overall growth opportunities, among other things. Implementation of changes to asset risk weightings for risk based capital calculations or items included or deducted in calculating regulatory capital and/or additional capital conservation buffers could also result in management modifying the Company’s business strategy and limiting the Company’s ability to repurchase our common stock. Furthermore, the imposition of liquidity requirements in connection with the implementation of Basel III could result in us having to lengthen the term of our funding, restructure our business models, and/or increase our holdings of liquid assets. Although most financial institutions would be affected, these business impacts could be felt unevenly, depending upon the business and product mix of each institution. Other potential effects could include higher dilution of common shareholders if we had to issue additional shares and a higher risk that we might fall below regulatory capital thresholds in an adverse economic cycle.

Any additional changes in the regulation and oversight of the Company, in the form of new laws, rules and regulations, could make compliance more difficult or expensive or otherwise materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or prospects.

Table of Contents

The price of our common stock may fluctuate.

The price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market constantly changes and recently, given the uncertainty in the financial markets, has fluctuated widely. From the beginning of fiscal year 2012 through the end of fiscal year 2013, our stock price fluctuated between a high of $11.90 per share and a low of $5.74 per share. We expect that the market closing price of our common stock will continue to fluctuate. Consequently, the current market price of our common stock may not be indicative of future market prices, and we may be unable to sustain or increase the value of an investment in our common stock.

Our common stock price can fluctuate as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include:

quarterly fluctuations in our operating and financial results;

operating results that vary from the expectations of management, securities analysts and investors;

changes in expectations as to our future financial performance, including financial estimates by securities analysts and investors;

events negatively impacting the financial services industry which result in a general decline in the market valuation of our common stock;

announcements of material developments affecting our operations or our dividend policy;

future sales of our equity securities;

new laws or regulations or new interpretations of existing laws or regulations applicable to our business;

changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles; and

general domestic economic and market conditions.

In addition, recently the stock market generally has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations, and industry factors and general economic and political conditions and events, such as economic slowdowns or recessions, interest rate changes or credit loss trends, could also cause our stock price to decrease regardless of our operating results.

The Bank is subject to liquidity risk.

Liquidity risk is the potential that the Bank will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due, capitalize on growth opportunities as they arise, or pay regular dividends because of an inability to liquidate assets or obtain adequate funding in a timely basis, at a reasonable cost and within acceptable risk tolerances.

Liquidity is required to fund various obligations, including credit commitments to borrowers, mortgage and other loan originations, withdrawals by depositors, repayment of borrowings, dividends to shareholders, operating expenses and capital expenditures.

Liquidity is derived primarily from retail deposit growth and retention; principal and interest payments on loans; principal and interest payments; sale, maturity and prepayment of investment securities; net cash provided from operations and access to other funding sources.

Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance our activities could be impaired by factors that affect us specifically or the financial services industry in general. Factors that could detrimentally impact our access to liquidity sources include a decrease in the level of our business activity due to a market downturn or adverse regulatory action against us. Our ability to borrow could also be impaired by factors that are not specific to us, such as a severe disruption of the financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry as a whole. If we become unable to obtain funds when needed, it could have a material adverse effect on our business and in turn, our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

Table of Contents

The Company is subject to liquidity risk.

Our recurring cash requirements, at the holding company level, primarily consist of interest expense on junior subordinated debentures issued to capital trusts. Holding company cash needs are routinely satisfied by dividends collected from the Bank.

While we expect that the holding company will continue to receive dividends from the Bank sufficient to satisfy holding company cash needs, in the event that the Bank has insufficient resources or is subject to legal or regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends, the Bank may be unable to provide dividends or a sufficient level of dividends to the holding company; in that event, the holding company may have insufficient funds to satisfy its obligations as they become due.

Future growth, operating results or regulatory requirements may require us to raise additional capital but that capital may not be available.

We are required by federal and state regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations. To the extent our future operating results erode capital or we elect to expand through loan growth or acquisition, we may be required to raise additional capital. Our ability to raise capital will depend on conditions in the capital markets, which are outside of our control, and on our financial performance. Accordingly, we cannot be assured of our ability to raise capital when needed or on favorable terms. If we cannot raise additional capital when needed, we will be subject to increased regulatory supervision and the imposition of restrictions on our growth and business. These actions could negatively impact our ability to operate or further expand our operations and may result in increases in operating expenses and reductions in revenues that could have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

Higher FDIC deposit insurance premiums and assessments could adversely affect our financial condition.

In February 2011, the FDIC adopted final rules to implement changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act with respect to the FDIC assessment rules. In particular, the definition of an institution's deposit insurance assessment base was changed from total deposits to total assets less tangible equity. In addition, the FDIC revised the deposit insurance assessment rates down. The new initial base assessment rates range from 5 to 9 basis points for Risk Category I banks to 35 basis points for Risk Category IV banks. Risk Category II and III banks will have an initial base assessment rate of 14 or 23 basis points, respectively. The new rates and assessment base have reduced our current FDIC insurance assessment for 2012 compared to 2011. However, if the risk category of the Bank changes adversely, our FDIC insurance premiums could increase.

Insured depository institution failures, as well as deterioration in banking and economic conditions, could significantly increase the loss provisions of the FDIC, resulting in a decline in the designated reserve ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund to historical lows. Effective January 1, 2011, the FDIC increased the designated reserve ratio from 1.25 to 2.00. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act permanently increased the deposit insurance limit on FDIC deposit insurance coverage to $250,000 per insured depositor, retroactive to January 1, 2008, which may result in even larger losses to the Deposit Insurance Fund.

The FDIC may further increase or decrease the assessment rate schedule in order to manage the Deposit Insurance Fund to prescribed statutory target levels. An increase in the risk category for the Bank or in the assessment rates could have an adverse effect on the Bank's earnings. The FDIC may terminate deposit insurance if it determines the institution involved has engaged in or is engaging in unsafe or unsound banking practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition, or has violated applicable laws, regulations or orders.

Future offerings of debt or other securities may adversely affect the market price of our stock.

In the future, we may attempt to increase our capital resources or, if our or the Bank’s capital ratios fall below the required minimums, we or the Bank could be forced to raise additional capital by making additional offerings of debt or preferred equity securities, including medium-term notes, trust preferred securities, senior or subordinated notes and preferred stock. Upon liquidation, holders of our debt securities and shares of preferred stock and lenders with respect to other borrowings will receive distributions of our available assets prior to the holders of our common stock.

Table of Contents

We may issue additional shares of common stock as a result of the 2014 Merger or otherwise, which may dilute the ownership and voting power of our shareholders and the book value of our common stock.

We are currently authorized to issue up to 30,000,000 shares of common stock, of which 7,036,087 shares were outstanding on February 28, 2014. Since 60% of the 2014 Merger consideration was paid in cash, we may decide to issue additional shares of common stock to replenish our cash position. In addition, we may decide to issue additional shares of common stock for any other corporate purposes. Our Board of Directors has authority, without action or vote of our shareholders, to issue all or part of the authorized but unissued shares of common stock in public offerings or up to 20% of our outstanding common stock in non-public offerings. Any issuance of shares of our common stock will dilute the percentage ownership interest of our common shareholders and may reduce the market price of our common stock or dilute the book value of our common stock, or both. Holders of our common stock are not entitled to preemptive rights or other protections against dilution.

The Company may lose lower-cost funding sources.

Checking, savings, and money market deposit account balances and other forms of customer deposits can decrease when customers perceive alternative investments, such as the stock market, as providing a better risk/return tradeoff. If customers move money out of bank deposits and into other investments, the Company could lose a relatively low-cost source of funds, increasing its funding costs and reducing the Company’s net interest income and net income.

There may be changes in accounting policies or accounting standards.

The Company’s accounting policies are fundamental to understanding its financial results and condition. Some of these policies require the use of estimates and assumptions that may affect the value of the Company’s assets or liabilities and financial results. The Company identified its accounting policies regarding the allowance for loan losses, security impairment, goodwill and other intangible assets, and income taxes to be critical because they require management to make difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain. Under each of these policies, it is possible that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions, using different assumptions, or as new information becomes available.

From time to time the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the SEC change the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the form and content of the Company’s external financial statements. Recently, FASB has proposed new accounting standards related to fair value accounting and accounting for leases that could materially change the Company’s financial statements in the future. In addition, accounting standard setters and those who interpret the accounting standards (such as the FASB, SEC, banking regulators and the Company’s independent auditors) may change or even reverse their previous interpretations or positions on how these standards should be applied. Changes in financial accounting and reporting standards and changes in current interpretations may be beyond the Company’s control, can be hard to predict and could materially impact how the Company reports its financial results and condition. In certain cases, the Company could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively or apply an existing standard differently (also retroactively) which may result in the Company restating prior period financial statements in material amounts.

The Company encounters continuous technological change.

The financial services industry is continually undergoing rapid technological change with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. The effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to better serve customers and to reduce costs. The Company’s future success depends, in part, upon its ability to address the needs of its customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands, as well as to create additional efficiencies in the Company’s operations. Many of the Company’s competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. The Company may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to its customers. Failure to successfully keep pace with technological change affecting the financial services industry could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business and, in turn, the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Table of Contents

The Company is subject to operational risk.

The Company faces the risk that the design of its controls and procedures, including those to mitigate the risk of fraud by employees or outsiders, may prove to be inadequate or are circumvented, thereby causing delays in detection of errors or inaccuracies in data and information. Management regularly reviews and updates the Company’s internal controls, disclosure controls and procedures, and corporate governance policies and procedures. Any system of controls, however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. Any failure or circumvention of the Company’s controls and procedures or failure to comply with regulations related to controls and procedures could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

The Company may also be subject to disruptions of its systems arising from events that are wholly or partially beyond its control (including, for example, computer viruses or electrical or telecommunications outages), which may give rise to losses in service to customers and to financial loss or liability. The Company is further exposed to the risk that its external vendors may be unable to fulfill their contractual obligations (or will be subject to the same risk of fraud or operational errors by their respective employees as is the Company) and to the risk that the Company’s (or its vendors’) business continuity and data security systems prove to be inadequate.

The Company’s performance is largely dependent on the talents and efforts of highly skilled individuals. There is intense competition in the financial services industry for qualified employees. In addition, the Company faces increasing competition with businesses outside the financial services industry for the most highly skilled individuals. The Company’s business operations could be adversely affected if it were unable to attract new employees and retain and motivate its existing employees.

Loss of, or failure to adequately safeguard, confidential or proprietary information may adversely affect the Company’s operations, net income or reputation.

The Company regularly collects, processes, transmits and stores significant amounts of confidential information regarding its customers, employees and others. This information is necessary for the conduct of the Company’s business activities, including the ongoing maintenance of deposit, loan, investment management and other account relationships for our customers, and receiving instructions and affecting transactions for those customers and other users of the Company’s products and services. In addition to confidential information regarding its customers, employees and others, the Company compiles, processes, transmits and stores proprietary, non-public information concerning its own business, operations, plans and strategies. In some cases, this confidential or proprietary information is collected, compiled, processed, transmitted or stored by third parties on behalf of the Company.

Information security risks have generally increased in recent years because of the proliferation of new technologies and the increased sophistication and activities of perpetrators of cyber-attacks. A failure in or breach of the Company’s operational or information security systems, or those of the Company’s third-party service providers, as a result of cyber-attacks or information security breaches or due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions could adversely affect our business, result in the disclosure or misuse of confidential or proprietary information, damage our reputation, increase our costs and/or cause losses. As a result, cyber security and the continued development and enhancement of the controls and processes designed to protect the Company’s systems, computers, software, data and networks from attack, damage or unauthorized access remain a priority for the Company.

If this confidential or proprietary information were to be mishandled, misused or lost, the Company could be exposed to significant regulatory consequences, reputational damage, civil litigation and financial loss. Mishandling, misuse or loss of this confidential or proprietary information could occur, for example, if the confidential or proprietary information were erroneously provided to parties who are not permitted to have the information, either by fault of the systems or employees of the Company, or the systems or employees of third parties which have collected, compiled, processed, transmitted or stored the information on the Company’s behalf, where the information is intercepted or otherwise inappropriately taken by third parties or where there is a failure or breach of the network, communications or information systems which are used to collect, compile, process, transmit or store the information.

Although the Company employs a variety of physical, procedural and technological safeguards to protect this confidential and proprietary information from mishandling, misuse or loss, these safeguards do not provide absolute assurance that mishandling, misuse or loss of the information will not occur, or that if mishandling, misuse or loss of the information did occur, those events would be promptly detected and addressed. Additionally, as information security risks and cyber threats continue to evolve, the Company may be required to expend additional resources to continue to enhance its information security measures and/or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities.

There may be claims and litigation.

From time to time as part of the Company’s normal course of business, customers make claims and take legal action against the Company based on actions or inactions of the Company. If such claims and legal actions are not resolved in a manner favorable to the Company, they may result in financial liability and/or adversely affect the market perception of the Company and its products and services. This may also impact customer demand for the Company’s products and services. Any financial liability or reputation damage could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

Severe weather, acts of terrorism and other external events could significantly impact our business.

A significant portion of our primary markets are located near coastal waters which could generate naturally occurring severe weather, or in response to climate change, that could have a significant impact on our ability to conduct business. Additionally, surrounding areas, including New Jersey, may be central targets for potential acts of terrorism against the United States. Such events could affect the stability of our deposit base, impair the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans, impair the value of collateral securing loans, cause significant property damage, result in loss of revenue and/or cause us to incur additional expenses. Although we have established disaster recovery policies and procedures, the occurrence of any such event in the future could have a material adverse effect on our business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. On October 29, 2012, Hurricane Sandy caused destruction along the East Coast, including in New Jersey, and resulted in, among other things, severe property damage and the closure of many businesses and financial markets. The financial impact to the Company was minimal as our mortgage loan customers in the areas affected by Hurricane Sandy did not sustain severe damage to their real properties and we experienced no loan delinquencies specifically related to Hurricane Sandy. In 2014, our market area was the subject of severe cold weather and several snow storms which disrupted commercial activities and the Bank’s operations.

Table of Contents

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

Not applicable.

Item 2. Properties.

We currently operate 19 branch offices in New Jersey, which includes the Bank’s main office in Cranbury, New Jersey. In addition, we have a Mortgage Warehousing Funding Office which we lease in Somerset, New Jersey and an Operations Center which we lease in Cranbury, New Jersey. The following table provides certain information with respect to our offices as of February 28, 2014:

Location		Leased or Owned	Original Year Leased or Acquired	Year of Lease Expiration
Main Office
	2650 Route 130	Leased	1989	2017
	Cranbury, New Jersey

Village Office
	74 North Main Street	Owned	2005	---
	Cranbury, New Jersey

Plainsboro Office
	Plainsboro Village Center	Leased	1998	2021
	11 Shalks Crossing Road
	Plainsboro, New Jersey

Hamilton Office
	3659 Nottingham Way	Leased	1999	2014
	Hamilton, New Jersey

Princeton Office
	The Windrows at Princeton Forrestal	Leased	2001	2016
	2000 Windrow Drive
	Princeton, New Jersey

Perth Amboy Office
	145 Fayette Street	Leased	2003	2019
	Perth Amboy, New Jersey

Jamesburg Office
	1 Harrison Street	Owned	2002	---
	Jamesburg, New Jersey

West Windsor Office
	44 Washington Road	Leased	2004	2019
	Princeton Jct, New Jersey

Fort Lee Office
	180 Main Street	Leased	2006	2019
	Fort Lee, New Jersey

Hightstown Office
	140 Mercer Street	Leased	2007	2024
	Hightstown, New Jersey

Mortgage Warehouse Funding Office
	285 Davidson Avenue	Leased	2009	2015
	Somerset, New Jersey

Lawrenceville Property
	150 Lawrenceville-Pennington Road,	Owned	2009	---
	Lawrenceville, New Jersey

South River Operations Center		Leased	2010	2015
	1246 South River Road, Bldg. 2
	Cranbury, New Jersey

Table of Contents

Rocky Hill Office
	995 Route 518	Owned	2011	---
	Skillman, New Jersey

Hopewell Office
	86 East Broad Street	Owned	2011	---
	Hopewell, New Jersey

Hillsborough Office
	32 New Amwell Road	Owned	2011	---
	Hillsborough, New Jersey

Rumson Office
	20 Bingham Avenue	Leased	2014	2016
	Rumson, New Jersey

Fair Haven Office
	636 River Road	Leased	2014	2016
	Fair Haven, New Jersey

Asbury Park Office
	511 Cookman Avenue	Owned	2014	---
	Asbury Park, New Jersey

Shrewsbury Office
	500 Broad Street	Leased	2014	2029
	Shrewsbury, New Jersey

Oceanport Office
	251 East Main Street	Leased	2014	2014
	Oceanport, New Jersey

Management believes the foregoing facilities are suitable for the Company’s and the Bank’s present and projected operations.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

The Company may, in the ordinary course of business, become a party to litigation involving collection matters, contract claims and other legal proceedings relating to the conduct of its business. Management is not aware of any material pending legal proceedings against the Company which, if determined adversely, would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

The common stock of the Company trades on the Nasdaq Global Market under the trading symbol “FCCY”. The following are the high and low sales prices per share for each quarter during 2013 and 2012, as reported on the Nasdaq Global Market.

Table of Contents

	2013 (1)				2012 (1)
	High		Low		High		Low
First Quarter	$	9.10	$	7.00	$	8.16	$	5.74
Second Quarter	$	9.67	$	8.50	$	8.58	$	7.03
Third Quarter	$	11.33	$	9.28	$	8.62	$	7.45
Fourth Quarter	$	11.90	$	9.70	$	8.48	$	7.80

(1)

Prices have been retroactively adjusted for (i) the 5% stock dividend declared December 20, 2012 and paid January 31, 2013 to shareholders of record on January 14, 2013 and (ii) the 5% stock dividend declared December 15, 2011 and paid February 2, 2012 to shareholders of record on January 17, 2012.

As of February 28, 2014, there were approximately 259 record holders of the Company’s common stock.

The Company paid 5% stock dividends on each of January 31, 2013, and February 2, 2012.

The Company has never paid a cash dividend on its common stock and there are no plans to pay a cash dividend on its common stock at this time. In addition, please refer to the discussion under the heading “Shareholders’ Equity and Dividends” under Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for additional restrictions on cash dividends.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

On July 21, 2005, the Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program under which the Company may repurchase in open market or privately negotiated transactions up to 5% of its common shares outstanding at that date. The Company undertook this repurchase program in order to increase shareholder value. The following table provides common stock repurchases made by or on behalf of the Company during the three months ended December 31, 2013, which purchases were made under the stock repurchase program.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (1)

Period		Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased As Part of Publicly Announced Plan or Program		Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet be Purchased Under the Plan or Program
Beginning	Ending
October 1, 2013	October 31, 2013		-	$	-		-		187,559
November 1, 2013	November 30, 2013		-		-		-		187,559
December 1, 2013	December 31, 2013		-		-		-		187,559
	Total		-	$	-		-		187,559

(1)

The Company’s common stock repurchase program covers a maximum of 225,824 shares of common stock of the Company, representing 5% of the outstanding common stock of the Company on July 21, 2005, as adjusted for subsequent stock dividends.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

Not required.

Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation.

This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, notes and tables included elsewhere in this report. Throughout the following sections, the “Company” refers to 1st Constitution Bancorp and, as the context requires, its wholly-owned subsidiary, 1st Constitution Bank (the “Bank”) and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013, which were 1st Constitution Investment Company of New Jersey, Inc., FCB Assets Holdings, Inc., 1st Constitution Title Agency, L.L.C., 204 South Newman Street Corp. and 249 New York Avenue, LLC. 1st Constitution Capital Trust II (“Trust II”), a subsidiary of the Company as of December 31, 2013, is not included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as it is a variable interest entity and the Company is not the primary beneficiary. The purpose of this discussion and analysis is to assist in the understanding and evaluation of the Company’s financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of operations.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation” is based upon the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Note 1 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 contains a summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies. Management believes the Company’s policies with respect to the methodologies for the determination of the allowance for loan losses and for determining other-than-temporary security impairment involve a higher degree of complexity and requires management to make difficult and subjective judgments which often require assumptions or estimates about highly uncertain matters. Changes in these judgments, assumptions or estimates could materially impact results of operations. These critical policies and their application are periodically reviewed with the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors. The provision for loan losses is based upon management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance, including an assessment of known and inherent risks in the portfolio, giving consideration to the size and composition of the loan portfolio, actual loan loss experience, level of delinquencies, detailed analysis of individual loans for which full collectability may not be assured, the existence and estimated net realizable value of any underlying collateral and guarantees securing the loans, and current economic and market conditions. Although management uses the best information available to it, the level of the allowance for loan losses remains an estimate which is subject to significant judgment and short-term change. Various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Company to make additional provisions for loan losses based upon information available to them at the time of their examination. Furthermore, the majority of the Company’s loans are secured by real estate in the State of New Jersey. Accordingly, the collectibility of a substantial portion of the carrying value of the Company’s loan portfolio is susceptible to changes in local market conditions and may be adversely affected should real estate values decline or should the Central New Jersey area experience an adverse economic shock. Future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary due to economic, operating, regulatory and other conditions beyond the Company’s control.

Real estate acquired through foreclosure, or a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, is recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs at the date of acquisition or transfer, and subsequently at the lower of its new cost or fair value less estimated selling costs. Adjustments to the carrying value at the date of acquisition or transfer are charged to the allowance for loan losses. The carrying value of the individual properties is subsequently adjusted to the extent it exceeds estimated fair value less estimated selling costs, at which time a provision for losses on such real estate is charged to operations. Appraisals are critical in determining the fair value of the other real estate owned amount. Assumptions for appraisals are instrumental in determining the value of properties. Overly optimistic assumptions or negative changes to assumptions could significantly affect the valuation of a property. The assumptions supporting such appraisals are carefully reviewed by management to determine that the resulting values reasonably reflect amounts realizable.

Management utilizes various inputs to determine the fair value of its investment portfolio. To the extent they exist, unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets (level 1) or quoted prices on similar assets (level 2) are utilized to determine the fair value of each investment in the portfolio. In the absence of quoted prices, valuation techniques would be used to determine fair value of any investments that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (level 3). Valuation techniques are based on various assumptions, including, but not limited to cash flows, discount rates, rate of return, adjustments for nonperformance and liquidity, and liquidation values. A significant degree of judgment is involved in valuing investments using level 3 inputs. The use of different assumptions could have a positive or negative effect on consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

Table of Contents

Management must periodically evaluate if unrealized losses (as determined based on the securities valuation methodologies discussed above) on individual securities classified as held to maturity or available for sale in the investment portfolio are considered to be other-than-temporary. The analysis of other-than-temporary impairment requires the use of various assumptions, including, but not limited to, the length of time an investment’s book value is greater than fair value, the severity of the investment’s decline, as well as any credit deterioration of the investment. If the decline in value of an investment is deemed to be other-than-temporary, the investment is written down to fair value and a non-cash impairment charge is recognized in the period of such evaluation.

Deferred Income Taxes. The Company records income taxes using the asset and liability method. Accordingly, deferred tax assets and liabilities: (i) are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns; (ii) are attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases; and (iii) are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply in the years when those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income tax expense in the period of enactment.

Deferred tax assets are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet at net realizable value. The Company periodically performs an assessment to evaluate the amount of deferred tax asset it is more likely than not to realize. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the amount of taxable income expected in future periods, as tax benefits require taxable income to be realized. If a valuation allowance is required, the deferred tax asset on the consolidated balance sheet is reduced via a corresponding income tax expense in the consolidated statement of income.

Rights Offering to Existing Shareholders

During the third quarter of 2012, the Company launched a shareholders’ common stock rights offering, which expired on October 5, 2012. The Company received gross proceeds of $5.0 million from holders of subscription rights who exercised their basic subscription rights and from holders who exercised the over-subscription privilege. The rights offering was fully subscribed. Accordingly, the Company issued a total of 555,555 shares of common stock to the holders of subscription rights who validly exercised their subscription rights, including pursuant to the exercise of the over-subscription privilege.

Merger of Rumson-Fair Haven Bank and Trust Company with and into the Bank in 2014

On February 7, 2014, Rumson-Fair Haven Bank and Trust Company (“RFHB”) was acquired by the Company through a merger of RFHB with and into the Bank. The operating results of RFHB are not included in the following discussion of the Company’s results of operations or in any financial or statistical data as the closing of this merger occurred after December 31, 2013. The Company did incur expenses in connection with this merger which were recorded in the year ended December 31, 2013.

Acquisition of Three Branches in 2011

On March 25, 2011, the Bank acquired certain deposit and other liabilities, real estate and related assets of the Rocky Hill, Hillsborough and Hopewell, New Jersey banking offices from another financial institution for a purchase price of $9.85 million (the “March 2011 Acquisition”).

The Company accounted for the March 2011 Acquisition using applicable accounting guidance regarding business combinations. The fair value of savings and transaction deposit accounts acquired was assumed to approximate the carrying value as these accounts have no stated maturity and are payable on demand. A core deposit intangible was ascribed to the value of non-maturity deposits based upon an independent third party evaluation which was prepared using the actual characteristics of the deposits and assumptions we believe to be reasonable. Certificates of deposit accounts were valued utilizing a discounted cash flows analysis based upon the underlying accounts’ contractual maturities and interest rates. The present value of the projected cash flow was then determined using discount rates based upon certificate of deposit interest rates available in the marketplace for accounts with similar terms. The fair value of the three branch buildings was determined via appraisals performed by qualified independent third party appraisers. The fair value of loans acquired, all of which were performing, was assumed to approximate amortized cost based upon the small size and nature of those loans.

Results of Operations

The Company reported net income for the year ended December 31, 2013 of $5,780,088, an increase of 14.2% from the $5,060,504 reported for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase was due primarily to an increase in noninterest income, a lower level in the provision for loan losses and a decrease in noninterest expenses which, in total, more than offset a decrease in net interest income and an increase in income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012.

Table of Contents

Diluted net income per common share was $0.95 for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to diluted net income per share of $0.90 for the year ended December 31, 2012. Basic net income per common share for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $0.97 as compared to $0.92 reported for the year ended December 31, 2012. All per share information has been restated for the effect of (i) a 5% stock dividend declared on December 20, 2012 and paid on January 31, 2013 to shareholders of record on January 14, 2013 and (ii) a 5% stock dividend declared December 15, 2011 and paid February 2, 2012 to shareholders of record on January 17, 2012. In addition, during the third quarter of 2012, the Company launched a shareholders’ common stock rights offering, which expired on October 5, 2012. The Company received gross proceeds of $5.0 million from holders of subscription rights who exercised their basic subscription rights and from holders who exercised the over-subscription privilege. The rights’ offering was fully subscribed. Accordingly, the Company issued a total of 555,555 shares of common stock to the holders of subscription rights who validly exercised their subscription rights, including pursuant to the exercise of the over-subscription privilege. The 555,555 shares issued in the shareholders’ common stock rights offering are included in the calculation of diluted and basic net income per common share for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Return on average assets (“ROA”) and return on average equity (“ROE”) were 0.72% and 8.73%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to 0.65% and 8.63%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 0.54% and 7.60%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2011. ROA and ROE improved for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 due to the higher level of net income for the year ended December 31, 2013.

The Bank’s results of operations depend primarily on net interest income, which is primarily affected by the market interest rate environment, the shape of the U.S. Treasury yield curve, and the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Other factors that may affect the Bank’s operating results are general and local economic and competitive conditions, government policies and actions of regulatory authorities. The net interest margin for the year ended December 31, 2013 was 3.44% as compared to the 3.98% net interest margin recorded for the year ended December 31, 2012, a decrease of 54 basis points. This decrease in the Company’s net interest margin for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared with the corresponding 2012 period was primarily due to two factors: (1) the decline in the balance of outstanding borrowings under mortgage warehouse lines and (2) the allocation of excess liquidity to much lower yielding overnight fund balances. The decline in borrowings under mortgage warehouse lines was due to the increase in long-term interest rates during the third and fourth quarters of 2013, which led to lower levels of mortgage refinancings, and the shift from borrowings for mortgage refinancings to borrowings for new mortgages to purchase real property, which typically require more time to document and close. The Company will continue to closely monitor the mix of earning assets and funding sources to maximize net interest income during this challenging interest rate environment.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income, the Company’s largest and most significant component of operating income, is the difference between interest and fees earned on loans and other earning assets, and interest paid on deposits and borrowed funds. This component represented 80.9% of the Company’s net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 84.0% of net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2012. Net interest income also depends upon the relative amount of average interest earning assets, average interest-bearing liabilities, and the interest rate earned or paid on them, respectively.

The following tables set forth the Company’s consolidated average balances of assets, liabilities and shareholders’ equity as well as interest income and expense on related items, and the Company’s average yield or rate for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The average rates are derived by dividing interest income and expense by the average balance of assets and liabilities, respectively.

Table of Contents

Average Balance Sheets with Resultant Interest and Rates

(yields on a tax-equivalent basis)	2013							2012								2011
		Average Balance			Interest	Average Yield			Average Balance			Interest	Average Yield			Average Balance			Interest	Average Yield

Assets:
Federal Funds Sold/Short-Term Investments	$	120,124,995		$	300,061	0.25	%	$	31,405,164		$	81,697	0.26	%	$	49,462,259		$	126,729	0.26	%
Investment Securities:
Taxable		162,246,451			3,915,261	2.41	%		170,089,425			4,434,108	2.61	%		200,218,556			5,422,190	2.71	%
Tax-exempt (4)		69,157,995			3,269,772	4.73	%		51,118,158			2,482,451	4.86	%		45,377,934			2,208,221	4.87	%

Total		231,404,446			7,185,033	3.10	%		221,207,583			6,916,559	3.13	%		245,596,490			7,630,411	3.11	%

Loan Portfolio (1):
Construction		43,391,226			2,757,353	6.35	%		56,802,621			3,673,709	6.47	%		60,260,579			3,865,334	6.41	%
Residential Real Estate		11,492,404			589,014	5.13	%		11,673,215			603,748	5.17	%		11,323,077			705,087	6.23	%
Home Equity		9,292,851			494,696	5.32	%		10,226,081			574,910	5.62	%		12,194,011			698,822	5.73	%
Commercial and Commercial Real Estate		145,470,344			10,392,340	7.14	%		145,308,719			10,873,003	7.48	%		134,446,807			10,153,005	7.55	%
Mortgage Warehouse Lines		151,335,795			7,095,925	4.69	%		204,852,547			9,734,919	4.75	%		131,955,449			6,459,208	4.89	%
Installment		265,464			16,900	6.37	%		341,400			23,419	6.86	%		452,504			31,342	6.93	%
All Other Loans		38,214,317			1,221,142	3.20	%		34,382,628			1,159,794	3.37	%		24,052,479			903,288	3.76	%
Total		399,462,401			22,567,370	5.65	%		463,587,211			26,643,502	5.75	%		374,684,906			22,816,086	6.09	%

Total Interest-Earning Assets		750,991,842			30,052,464	4.00	%		716,199,958			33,641,758	4.70	%		669,743,655			30,573,226	4.56	%

Allowance for Loan Losses		(6,857,616	)						(6,370,415	)						(5,959,591	)
Cash and Due From Banks		9,998,816							12,570,141							13,136,295
Other Assets		47,401,097							52,092,249							44,527,891
Total Assets	$	801,534,139						$	774,491,933						$	721,448,250

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity:
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
Money Market and NOW Accounts	$	222,581,196		$	757,905	0.34	%	$	203,419,423		$	988,999	0.49	%	$	172,790,166		$	1,703,342	0.99	%
Savings Accounts		198,168,724			893,509	0.45	%		192,958,737			1,163,967	0.60	%		179,903,197			1,387,585	0.77	%
Certificates of Deposit under $100,000		68,741,109			860,217	1.25	%		70,100,750			1,077,425	1.54	%		73,470,718			1,260,946	1.72	%
Certificates of Deposit of $100,000 and Over		71,616,214			976,287	1.36	%		76,526,600			1,084,312	1.42	%		79,898,632			1,308,249	1.64	%
Other Borrowed Funds		10,284,794			414,904	4.03	%		17,804,645			450,462	2.53	%		18,400,493			444,185	2.41	%
Trust Preferred Securities		18,557,000			352,067	1.90	%		18,557,000			385,977	2.08	%		18,557,000			683,057	3.68	%

Total Interest-Bearing Liabilities		589,949,037			4,254,889	0.72	%		579,367,155			5,151,142	0.89	%		543,020,206			6,787,364	1.25	%

Net Interest Spread (2)						3.28	%						3.81	%						3.31	%

Demand Deposits		137,872,991							127,558,073							117,876,295
Other Liabilities		7,500,084							8,912,516							8,800,907
Total Liabilities		735,322,112							715,837,744							669,697,408
Shareholders' Equity		66,212,027							58,654,189							51,750,842
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity	$	801,534,139						$	774,491,933						$	721,448,250

Net Interest Margin (3)				$	25,797,575	3.44	%				$	28,490,616	3.98	%				$	23,785,862	3.55	%

(1)

Loan origination fees are considered an adjustment to interest income. For the purpose of calculating loan yields, average loan balances include nonaccrual loans with no related interest income. Please refer to Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation under the heading “Non-Performing Assets” for a discussion of the Bank’s policy with regard to non-accrual loans.

(2)	The interest rate spread is the difference between the average yield on interest earning assets and the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities.

(3)	The net interest margin is equal to net interest income divided by average interest earning assets.

(4)	Tax- equivalent basis.

Changes in net interest income and margin result from the interaction between the volume and composition of interest earning assets, interest bearing liabilities, related yields, and associated funding costs. The Rate/Volume Table demonstrates the impact on net interest income of changes in the volume of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities and changes in interest rates earned and paid.

The Company’s net interest income decreased on a tax-equivalent basis by $2,693,041, or 9.5%, to $25,797,575 for the year ended December 31, 2013 from the $28,490,616 reported for the year ended December 31, 2012. As indicated in the Rate/Volume Table, the principal factor contributing to the decrease in net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2013 was a decreased volume of loans in the loan portfolio combined with lower rates earned on interest-earning assets.

Table of Contents

The Company’s net interest income increased on a tax-equivalent basis by $4,704,754, or 19.8%, to $28,490,616 for the year ended December 31, 2012 from the $23,785,862 reported for the year ended December 31, 2011. As indicated in the Rate/Volume Table, the principal factor contributing to the increase in net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2012 was an increase in interest income of $3,068,532, resulting from increased volume on the interest-earning loan portfolio.

Rate/Volume Table	Amount of Increase (Decrease)
	2013 versus 2012							2012 versus 2011
	Due to Change in:							Due to Change in:
(Tax-equivalent basis)	Volume		Rate		Total			Volume			Rate			Total

Interest Income:
Loans:
Construction		($857,955)		($58,401)		$(916,356	)		$(224,718	)		$33,093			$(191,625	)
Residential Real Estate		(9,531)		(5,203)		(14,734)			20,250			(121,589	)		(101,339	)
Home Equity		(50,992)		(29,222)		(80,214)			(111,632	)		(12,280	)		(123,912	)
Commercial and Commercial Real Estate		12,738		(493,401)		(480,663)			817,096			(97,093	)		720,003
Mortgage Warehouse Lines		(2,529,065)		(109,930)		(2,638,994)			3,512,559			(236,848	)		3,275,711
Installment		(5,028)		(1,491)		(6,519)			(7,653	)		(270	)		(7,923	)
All Other Loans		124,464		(63,115)		61,348			369,363			(112,857	)		256,506
Total Loans		(3,315,369)		(760,763)		(4,076,132)			4,375,263			(547,842	)		3,827,421
Investment Securities :
Taxable		(191,686)		(327,161)		(518,847)			(802,182	)		(185,901	)		(988,083	)
Tax-exempt		865,256		(77,935)		787,321			279,157			(4,931	)		274,226
Total Investment Securities		673,570		(405,096)		268,474			(523,026	)		(190,831	)		(713,857	)
Federal Funds Sold / Short-Term Investments		226,089		(7,725)		218,364			(45,032	)		0			(45,032	)
Total Interest Income		(2,415,710)		(1,173,584)		(3,589,294)			3,807,205			(738,673	)		3,068,532

Interest Expense :
Money Market and NOW Accounts		83,964		(315,058)		($231,094)			$149,846			($864,189	)		($714,343	)
Savings Accounts		25,120		(295,578)		(270,458)			91,373			(314,991	)		(223,618	)
Certificates of Deposit under $100,000		(17,428)		(199,780)		(217,208)			(55,598	)		(127,923	)		(183,521	)
Certificates of Deposit of $100,000 and Over		(65,918)		(42,107)		(108,025)			(51,731	)		(172,206	)		(223,937	)
Other Borrowed Funds		(246,439)		210,881		(35,558)			(15,082	)		21,359			6,277
Trust Preferred Securities		0		(33,910)		(33,910)			0			(297,080	)		(297,080	)
Total Interest Expense		(220,701)		(675,552)		(896,253)			118,808			(1,755,030	)		(1,636,222	)

Net Interest Income		($2,195,009)		($498,032)		($2,693,041)			$3,688,397			$1,016,357			$4,704,754

Average interest-earning assets increased by $34,791,884, or 4.9%, to $750,991,842 for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $716,199,958 for the year ended December 31, 2012. The average investment securities portfolio increased by $10,196,863, or 4.6%, to $231,404,446 for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $221,207,583 for the year ended December 31, 2012. The average loan portfolio decreased by $64,124,810, or 13.9%, to $399,462,401 for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $463,587,211 for the year ended December 31, 2012 The overall risk profile of the loan portfolio was reduced by a change in its composition via a decrease in average construction loans (which are generally riskier than other loans) of $13,411,395, or 23.7%, to $43,391,226 for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $56,802,621 for the year ended December 31, 2012. In addition, the second half of 2013 saw an increase in long-term interest rates that accelerated the decrease in the balance of outstanding mortgage warehouse lines. The average balance of mortgage warehouse lines decreased by $53,516,752, or 26.1%, to $151,335,795 for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to an average balance of $204,852,547 for the year ended December 31, 2012. Overall, the yield on interest-earning assets, on a tax-equivalent basis, decreased 70 basis points to 4.00% for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to 4.70% for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Average interest earning assets increased by $46,456,303, or 6.9%, to $716,199,958 for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $669,743,655 for the year ended December 31, 2011 The average total loan portfolio increased by $88,902,305, or 23.7%, to $463,587,211 for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $374,684,906 for the year ended December 31, 2011. Due to a decrease in the level of market interest rates during 2012, loan yields averaged 5.75% for the year ended December 31, 2012, 34 basis points lower than for the year ended December 31, 2011. The average investment securities portfolio decreased $24,388,907, or 9.9%, while the yield on that portfolio decreased 2 basis points for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. Overall, the yield on interest earning assets increased 14 basis points to 4.70% for the year ended December 31, 2012 from 4.56% for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Table of Contents

Interest expense decreased by $896,253, or 17.4%, to $4,254,889 for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $5,151,142 for the year ended December 31, 2012. This decrease in interest expense was principally attributable to higher levels of interest-bearing liabilities priced at a significantly lower market interest rate level. Money market and NOW accounts, increased on average by $19,161,773 in 2013, or 9.4%, as compared to 2012, contributing to the funding of investment portfolio growth. The cost on these deposits decreased 15 basis points in 2013 as compared to 2012. Average interest bearing liabilities rose 1.8% in 2013 compared to 2012. The cost of total interest-bearing liabilities decreased 17 basis points to 0.72% in 2013 from 0.89% in 2012.

Interest expense decreased by $1,636,222, or 24.1%, to $5,151,142 for the year ended December 31, 2012, from $6,787,364 for the year ended December 31, 2011. This decrease in interest expense was principally attributable to higher levels of interest-bearing liabilities priced at significantly lower market interest rate levels. Money market and NOW accounts increased on average by $30,629,257 in 2012, or 17.7%, as compared to 2011, contributing to the funding of our loan portfolio growth. The cost on these deposits decreased 50 basis points in 2012 as compared to 2011. Average interest bearing liabilities rose 6.7% in 2012 from 2011. The cost of total interest-bearing liabilities decreased 36 basis points to 0.89% in 2012 from 1.25% in 2011.

Provision for Loan Losses

Management considers a complete review of the following specific factors in determining the provisions for loan losses: historical losses by loan category, non-accrual loans, and problem loans as identified through internal classifications, collateral values, and the growth and size of the loan portfolio.

In addition to these factors, management takes into consideration current economic conditions and local real estate market conditions. Using this evaluation process, the Company’s provision for loan losses was $1,076,662 for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $2,149,992 for the year ended December 31, 2012. Net charge-offs for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were $1,189,302 and $533,230, respectively. In addition, the decrease in the provision for loan losses was primarily attributed to the $148,478,028, or 28.5%, decrease in the loan portfolio balance to $373,336,082 at December 31, 2013 from $521,814,110 at December 31, 2012.

Non-Interest Income

Total non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $5,827,244 an increase of $559,716, or 10.6%, over non-interest income of $5,267,528 for the year ended December 31, 2012. This component represented 23.6% of the Company’s net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 19.0% of net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Service charges on deposit accounts decreased by $10,343 to $919,819 for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $930,162 for the year ended December 31, 2012. This component of non-interest income represented 15.8% and 17.7% of the total non-interest income for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decrease for the year ended December 31, 2013 was due to a decrease in the number of deposit accounts subject to service charges.

Gains on sales of loans held for sale increased by $201,460, or 10.8%, to $2,063,679 for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $1,862,219 for the year ended December 31, 2012. Loan sale volume totaled $166.1 million in 2013 compared to $163.2 million in 2012. The Bank sells both residential mortgage loans and Small Business Administration loans in the secondary market.

In December 2012, the Bank sold available-for-sale securities with an aggregate book value of $5,761,594 that resulted in a pre-tax gain of $313,004. There were no sales of securities for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Non-interest income also includes income from bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”), which amounted to $457,069 for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $447,525 for the year ended December 31, 2012. The Bank purchased tax-free BOLI assets to partially offset the cost of employee benefit plans and reduce the Company’s overall effective tax rate.

Table of Contents

The Bank also generates non-interest income from a variety of fee-based services. These include safe deposit box rentals, wire transfer service fees and Automated Teller Machine fees for non-Bank customers. Greater customer demand for these services contributed to the increase in the other income component of non-interest income to $2,386,677 for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to $1,714,618 for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Non-Interest Expenses

Non-interest expenses decreased by $2,348,321, or 9.9%, to $21,422,240 for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $23,770,561 for the year ended December 31, 2012. The decrease in other real estate owned expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 was the most significant factor contributing to the decrease in total non-interest expenses when compared with non-interest expenses for the year ended December 31, 2012. The following table presents the major components of non-interest expenses for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.


Non-interest Expenses	Year ended December 31,
	2013		2012
Salaries and employee benefits	$	12,708,952	$	12,434,900
Occupancy expense		2,574,466		2,470,577
Equipment expense		884,092		862,765
Telephone		364,059		351,183
Marketing		294,663		185,738
Data processing services		1,112,470		1,056,629
Regulatory, professional and consulting fees		1,104,037		726,556
FDIC deposit insurance		346,149		565,027
Other real estate owned expenses		352,927		3,553,779
Amortization of intangible assets		267,966		267,967
Other expenses		1,412,459		1,295,440
Total	$	21,422,240	$	23,770,561

Salaries and employee benefits, which represent the largest portion of non-interest expenses, increased by $274,052, or 2.2%, to $12,708,952 for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $12,434,900 for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase in salaries and employee benefits for the year ended December 31, 2013 was the result of regular merit increases and increased health care costs.

Occupancy expenses increased by $103,889, or 4.2%, to $2,574,466 for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $2,470,577 for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase in occupancy expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 was primarily attributable to increased maintenance costs related to the Bank’s branch properties.

The cost of data processing services increased to $1,112,470 for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $1,056,629 for the year ended December 31, 2012 as additional expenses were incurred in connection with a 2013 initiative to upgrade the software capabilities in branch offices in order to fully implement the Bank’s mobile banking system.

Regulatory, professional and other fees increased by $377,481, or 52.0%, to $1,104,037 for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $726,556 for the year ended December 31, 2012. During 2013, the Company incurred professional fees in connection with consultants engaged to assess the Company’s compliance with regulatory requirements and risk management programs. In addition, the increase in regulatory, professional and other fees for the year ended December 31, 2013 was partially due to the Company’s incurrence of legal fees in connection with the recently completed merger of Rumson-Fair Haven Bank and Trust Company with and into the Bank.

Other real estate owned expenses decreased by $3,200,852 to $352,927 for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $3,553,779 for the year ended December 31, 2012 as the Company incurred a lower level of property tax, maintenance and other costs on fewer repossessed properties held as other real estate owned during 2013 compared to 2012. Other real estate owned expense for 2013 is net of gains on sale of $922,861 and property rental income of $308,641 compared to property rentals of $245,833 in 2012. In addition, the Company recorded loss provisions of $758,625 during 2013 and $2,357,825 during 2012. At December 31, 2013, the Bank held three properties with an aggregate value of $2,136,341 as other real estate owned compared to six properties with an aggregate value of $8,332,601 at December 31, 2012.

Table of Contents

FDIC insurance expense decreased to $346,149 for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $565,027 for the year ended December 31, 2012 as a result of the changes to FDIC assessment rules attributable to the Dodd-Frank Act.

All other expenses increased by $117,019 to $1,412,459 for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $1,295,440 for the year ended December 31, 2012 as a result of increases in payroll processing fees, ATM operation expenses and insurance premiums.

An important financial services industry productivity measure is the efficiency ratio. The efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing total operating expenses by net interest income plus non-interest income. An increase in the efficiency ratio indicates that more resources are being utilized to generate the same or greater volume of income, while a decrease would indicate a more efficient allocation of resources. The Company’s efficiency ratio decreased to 70.1% for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to 72.1% for the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily as a result of the $3,200,852 decrease in other real estate owned expenses.

Income Taxes

Pre-tax income increased to $8,065,450 for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $7,032,469 for the year ended December 31, 2012.

The Company had income tax expense of $2,285,362 for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to income tax expense of $1,971,965 for year ended December 31, 2012. The increase in the income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 was primarily due to the $1,032,981 increase in pre-tax income for 2013 compared to 2012. The Company’s effective tax rate increased slightly to 28.3% in 2013 from 28.0% in 2012 due to a lower ratio of tax-exempt income to pre-tax income in 2013 when compared to 2012.

Financial Condition

Cash and Cash Equivalents

At December 31, 2013, cash and cash equivalents totaled $69,278,771 compared to $14,044,921 at December 31, 2012. Cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2013 consisted primarily of cash and due from banks of $69,267,345 and federal funds sold/short-term investments of $11,426. The corresponding balances at December 31, 2012 were $14,033,501 and $11,420, respectively. The increase in long-term market interest rates that occurred during the second half of 2013 reduced the demand for mortgage refinancings, which led to a decrease in borrowings under mortgage warehouse lines extended to licensed mortgage banking companies by the Bank. To the extent that the Bank did not utilize the funds for loan originations or purchases of investment securities, the cash inflows accumulated in cash and cash equivalents.

Investment Securities

The investment securities portfolio amounted to $252,015,622, or 33.9% of total assets, at December 31, 2013 compared to $225,868,865, or 26.9% of total assets, at December 31, 2012. Proceeds from maturities and prepayments for the year ended December 31, 2013 totaled $56,303,911 while purchases of investment securities totaled $88,331,316 during this period. On an average balance basis, the investment securities portfolio represented 30.8% of average interest-earning assets for each of the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. The average yield earned on the portfolio, on a fully tax-equivalent basis, was 3.10% for the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease of 3 basis points from 3.13% earned for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Securities available for sale are investments that may be sold in response to changing market and interest rate conditions or for other business purposes. Activity in this portfolio is undertaken primarily to manage liquidity and interest rate risk and to take advantage of market conditions that create more economically attractive returns. At December 31, 2013, available-for-sale securities amounted to $99,198,807, a decrease of $10,642,158 from $109,840,965 at December 31, 2012.

Table of Contents

Amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and the estimated fair value by type of securities are as follows:

				Gross			Gross
	Amortized			Unrealized			Unrealized				Fair
2013	Cost			Gains			Losses				Value

Available for sale-
U. S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. Government sponsored
corporations (“GSE”) and agencies		$	22,386,761		$	33,213		$	(910,274	)		$	21,509,700
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations - GSE			3,547,404			134,388			-				3,681,792
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations – non- GSE			2,782,843			52,227			(8,674	)			2,826,396
Residential mortgage backed securities – GSE			31,532,051			872,169			(438,273	)			31,965,947
Obligations of State and
Political subdivisions			22,206,959			149,959			(2,710,874	)			19,646,044
Trust preferred debt securities – single issuer			2,468,839			-			(455,739	)			2,013,100
Corporate debt securities			16,228,474			318,590			(29,336	)			16,517,728
Restricted Stock			1,013,100			-			-				1,013,100
Mutual Fund			25,000			-			-				25,000
		$	102,191,431		$	1,560,546		$	(4,553,170	)		$	99,198,807

Held to maturity-	Amortized Cost		Other-Than- Temporary Impairment Recognized In Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Carrying Value		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Obligations of U.S. Government
sponsored corporations (“GSE”) and agencies	$	1,524,860		-		$	1,524,860	$	10,310		-		$	1,535,170
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations – GSE		14,803,739		-			14,803,739		379,815		-			15,183,554
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations- non-GSE		10,682,363		-			10,682,363		119,777		(27,526	)		10,774,614
Residential mortgage backed securities – GSE		65,240,620		-			65,240,620		611,062		(387,034	)		65,464,648
Obligations of State and Political subdivisions
Trust preferred debt securities - pooled		59,400,916		-			59,400,916		1,399,938		(1,296,357	)		59,504,497
Corporate debt securities		656,662		(500,944	)		155,718		-		(6,863	)		148,855
		1,008,599		-			1,008,599		9,836		-			1,018,435

	$	153,317,759	$	(500,944	)	$	152,816,815	$	2,530,738	$	(1,717,780	)	$	153,629,773

Table of Contents

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
2012	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value

Available for sale-
U. S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. Government
sponsored corporations (“GSE”) and agencies	$	29,384,595	$	137,847	$	(26,907)	$	29,495,535
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations- GSE		6,349,310		283,355		-		6,632,665
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations- non GSE		3,811,933		119,323		(7,074)		3,924,182
Residential mortgage backed securities - GSE		24,912,948		1,576,387		-		26,489,335
Obligations of State and Political subdivisions		20,793,222		375,416		(486,337)		20,682,301
Trust preferred debt securities-single issuer		2,466,009		-		(467,643)		1,998,366
Corporate debt securities		17,797,681		325,731		(23,131)		18,100,281
Restricted stock		2,493,300		-		-		2,493,300
Mutual fund		25,000		-		-		25,000

	$	108,033,998	$	2,818,059	$	(1,011,092)	$	109,840,965

Held to maturity-	Amortized Cost		Other-Than- Temporary Impairment Recognized In Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Carrying Value		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Obligations of U.S. Government
sponsored corporations (“GSE”) and agencies
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations – GSE	$	3,073,957	$	-		$	3,073,957		33,213	$	-		$	3,107,170
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations-non-GSE		19,660,625		-			19,660,625		1,021,556		-			20,682,181
Residential mortgage backed securities – GSE		13,387,974		-			13,387,974		796,892		(289	)		14,184,577
Obligations of State and Political subdivisions		19,950,190		-			19,950,190		849,040		(944	)		20,798,286
Trust preferred debt securities - pooled		42,815,706		-			42,815,706		3,039,935		-			45,855,641
Corporate debt securities		656,662		(500,944	)		155,718		-		(9,638	)		146,080
		16,983,730		-			16,983,730		84,443		(2,745	)		17,065,428

	$	116,528,844	$	(500,944	)	$	116,027,900	$	5,825,079	$	(13,616	)	$	121,839,363

Table of Contents

Proceeds from maturities and prepayments of securities available for sale amounted to $22,346,133 for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $34,468,644 for the year ended December 31, 2012. At December 31, 2013, the portfolio had net unrealized losses of $2,992,624 compared to net unrealized gains of $1,806,967 at December 31, 2012. These unrealized gains/(losses) are reflected net of tax in shareholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income.

Securities held to maturity, which are carried at amortized historical cost, are investments for which there is the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity. At December 31, 2013, securities held to maturity were $152,816,815, an increase of $36,788,915 from $116,027,900 at December 31, 2012. The fair value of the held-to-maturity portfolio at December 31, 2013 was $153,629,773.

The amortized cost, estimated fair value and weighted average yield of investment securities at December 31, 2013, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Federal Home Loan Bank stock is included in “Available for Sale - Due in one year or less.”

	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Weighted Average Yield*
Available for sale-
Due in one year or less
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of US Government sponsored corporations (“GSE”) and agencies	$	4,999,345	$	5,001,550		0.33	%
Residential mortgage backed securities-GSE		2,753		2,769		6.02	%
Obligations of State and Political subdivisions		110,000		110,322		6.94	%
Corporate Debt Securities		1,009,258		1,011,685		0.73	%
Restricted Stock		1,013,100		1,013,100		4.17	%
Mutual Fund		25,000		25,000		4.17	%
	$	7,159,456	$	7,164,426		1.04	%


Due after one year through five years
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of US Government sponsored corporations (“GSE”) and agencies	$	6,517,670	$	6,516,070		1.11	%
Residential mortgage backed securities-GSE		7,079,770		6,962,402		1.59	%
Obligations of State and Political subdivisions		374,402		375,815		5.56	%
Corporate Debt Securities		14,133,770		14,449,933		2.07	%
	$	28,105,612	$	28,304,220		1.78	%


Due after five years through ten years
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of US Government sponsored corporations (“GSE”) and agencies	$	10,869,746	$	9,992,080		1.77	%
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations-GSE		123,301		131,996		4.74	%
Residential mortgage backed securities-GSE		8,106,769		8,151,463		2.83	%
Obligations of State and Political subdivisions		4,249,720		4,163,057		4.11	%
	$	23,349,536	$	22,438,596		2.60	%


Due after ten years
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations-GSE	$	3,424,103	$	3,549,796		3.33	%
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations-non GSE		2,782,843		2,826,396		2.80	%
Residential mortgage backed securities-GSE		16,342,759		16,849,313		3.26	%
Obligations of State and Political subdivisions		17,472,837		14,996,850		4.21	%
Corporate Debt Securities		1,085,446		1,056,110		4.28	%
Trust Preferred Debt Securities		2,468,839		2,013,100		0.90	%
	$	43,576,827	$	41,291,565		3.49	%

Total	$	102,191,431	$	99,198,807		2.62	%

Table of Contents

Held to maturity-
Due in one year or less
Obligations of US government sponsored corporations (“GSE”) and agencies	$	1,524,860	$	1,535,170	1.20	%
Obligations of State and Political subdivisions		6,398,314		6,403,395	1.47	%
Corporate Debt Securities		1,008,599		1,018,435	3.56	%
	$	8,931,773	$	8,957,000	1.66	%


Due after one year through five years
Obligations of US Government sponsored corporations (“GSE”) and agencies	$	-	$	-	0	%
Obligations of State and Political subdivisions		11,538,560		11,900,078	3.81	%
Corporate Debt Securities		0		-	0	%
	$	11,538,660	$	11,900,078	3.81	%


Due after five years through ten years
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations-GSE	$	47,001	$	47,265	0.89	%
Residential collateralized mortgage Obligations- non GSE	$	915,452	$	909,965	0.68	%
Residential mortgage backed securities-GSE		21,939,890		22,016,399	2.08	%
Obligations of State and Political subdivisions		21,469,445		22,088,765	4.72	%
	$	44,371,788	$	45,061,765	3.33	%


Due after ten years
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations-GSE	$	14,756,736	$	15,136,289	3.31	%
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations-non GSE		9,766,913		9,864,649	3.47	%
Residential mortgage backed securities-GSE		46,300,730		43,448,249	2.90	%
Obligations of State and Political subdivisions		19,994,497		19,112,888	4.89	%
Trust Preferred Debt Securities		656,662		148,855	0.74	%
	$	88,475,538	$	87,710,930	3.46	%

Total	$	153,317,759	$	153,629,773	3.34	%

* computed on a tax-equivalent basis.

The Company regularly reviews the composition of the investment securities portfolio, taking into account market risks, the current and expected interest rate environment, liquidity needs and its overall interest rate risk profile and strategic goals.

Table of Contents

On a quarterly basis, management evaluates each security in the portfolio with an individual unrealized loss to determine if that loss represents other-than-temporary impairment. During the fourth quarter of 2009, management determined that it was necessary, following other-than-temporary impairment requirements, to write down the cost basis of the Company’s only pooled trust preferred security. This trust preferred debt security was issued by a two issuer pool (Preferred Term Securities XXV, Ltd. co-issued by Keefe, Bruyette and Woods, Inc. and First Tennessee (“PreTSL XXV”)), consisting primarily of financial institution holding companies. During 2009, the Company recognized an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $864,727 with respect to this security. No other-than-temporary impairment losses were recorded during 2013 and 2012. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Loans Held for Sale

Loans held for sale at December 31, 2013 amounted to $10,923,689 compared to $35,960,262 at December 31, 2012. As indicated in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, the amount of loans originated for sale was $138,980,555 for 2013 compared with $178,044,892 for 2012. The decrease from December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2103 was primarily due to the increase in long-term interest rates during the second half of 2013.

Loans

The loan portfolio, which represents our largest asset, is a significant source of both interest and fee income. Elements of the loan portfolio are subject to differing levels of credit and interest rate risk. The Bank’s primary lending focus continues to be mortgage warehouse lines, construction loans, commercial loans, owner-occupied commercial mortgage loans and tenanted commercial real estate loans. Total loans averaged $399,462,401 for the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease of $64,124,810, or 13.8%, compared to an average of $463,587,211 for the year ended December 31, 2012. At December 31, 2013, total loans amounted to $373,336,082 compared to $521,814,110 at December 31, 2012, a decrease of $148,478,028. The decrease in the loan portfolio was primarily the result of two factors: (1) the increase in long-term interest rates during the second half of 2013, which led to lower levels of mortgage refinancings, and (2) the shift from borrowings for mortgage refinancings to borrowings for new mortgages to purchase real property, which typically require more time to document and close. The average yield earned on the loan portfolio was 5.65% for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to 5.75% for the year ended December 31, 2012, a decrease of 10 basis points.

The following table represents the components of the loan portfolio for the dates indicated.

	December 31,
	2013					2012					2011					2010					2009
	Amount		%			Amount		%			Amount		%			Amount		%			Amount		%
Construction loans	$	51,002,172		14	%	$	55,691,393		11	%	$	49,285,783		10	%	$	67,890,703		16	%	$	79,805,278		21	%
Residential real estate loans		13,764,178		4	%		10,897,307		2	%		12,885,352		3	%		10,435,038		3	%		10,253,895		3	%
Commercial business		82,348,055		22	%		57,865,436		11	%		50,784,674		11	%		54,733,172		13	%		57,925,392		15	%
Commercial real estate		98,389,730		26	%		102,412,694		20	%		99,636,976		21	%		95,277,814		23	%		96,306,097		25	%
Mortgage warehouse lines		116,951,357		31	%		284,127,530		54	%		249,345,831		52	%		169,575,899		41	%		119,382,078		32	%
Loans to individuals		9,766,114		3	%		9,643,385		2	%		12,219,640		3	%		13,349,036		3	%		15,554,027		4	%
Deferred loan costs		943,950		0	%		987,086		0	%		1,017,959		0	%		543,753		0	%		489,809		0	%
All other loans		170,526		0	%		189,279		0	%		255,556		0	%		181,924		0	%		229,159		0	%

Total	$	373,336,082		100	%	$	521,814,110		100	%	$	475,431,771		100	%	$	411,987,339		100	%	$	379,945,735		100	%

Commercial and commercial real estate loans averaged $145,470,344 for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $161,625 when compared to $145,308,719 for the year ended December 31, 2012. Commercial loans consist primarily of loans to small and middle market businesses and are typically working capital loans used to finance inventory, receivables or equipment needs. These loans are generally secured by business assets of the commercial borrower. The average yield on the commercial and commercial real estate loan portfolio decreased 34 basis points to 7.14% for 2013 from 7.48% for 2012.

Construction loans averaged $43,391,226 for the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease of $13,411,395, or 23.6%, compared to $56,802,621 for the year ended December 31, 2012. Due to declining construction activity in the Bank’s market area, management’s strategy has been directed to increasing the lower risk commercial business loans portfolio. Generally, these loans represent owner-occupied or investment properties and usually complement a broader commercial relationship between the Bank and the borrower. Construction loans are structured to provide for advances only after work is completed and inspected by qualified professionals. The average yield on the construction loan portfolio decreased 12 basis points to 6.357% for 2013 from 6.47% for 2012.

Table of Contents

The Mortgage warehouse lines component of the loan portfolio decreased by $167,176,173, or 58.8%, to $116,951,357 compared to $284,127,530 at December 31, 2012.

The Bank’s Mortgage Warehouse Funding Group offers revolving lines of credit that are available to licensed mortgage banking companies (the “Warehouse Line of Credit”). The Warehouse Line of Credit is used by the mortgage banker to originate one-to-four family residential mortgage loans that are pre-sold to the secondary mortgage market, which includes state and national banks, national mortgage banking firms, insurance companies and government-sponsored enterprises, including the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and others. On average, an advance under the Warehouse Line of Credit remains outstanding for a period of less than 30 days, with repayment coming directly from the sale of the loan into the secondary mortgage market. Interest (the spread between our borrowing cost and the rate charged to the client) and a transaction fee are collected by the Bank at the time of repayment. Additionally, customers of the Warehouse Lines of Credit are required to maintain deposit relationships with the Bank that, on average, represent 10% to 15% of the loan balances. The Bank had outstanding Warehouse Line of Credit advances of $116,951,353 at December 31, 2013 compared to $284,127,530 at December 31, 2012. During 2013 and 2012, Warehouse Lines of Credit averaged $151,335,795 and $204,852,547, respectively, and yielded 4.69% and 4.75%, respectively. The number of active mortgage banking customers increased from 46 in 2012 to 48 in 2013.

The following table provides information concerning the interest rate sensitivity of the commercial and commercial real estate loans and construction loans at December 31, 2013.

As of December 31, 2013:	Maturity Range
Type	Within One Year		After One But Within Five Years		After Five Years		Total
Commercial & Commercial Real Estate	$	44,187,059	$	44,757,459	$	91,793,267	$	180,737,785
Construction Loans		34,016,000		14,434,438		2,551,739		51,002,177
Total	$	78,203,059	$	59,191,897	$	94,345,006	$	231,739,962

Fixed rate loans	$	11,135,128	$	31,003,545	$	16,336,141	$	58,474,814
Floating rate loans		67,067,931		28,188,352		78,008,865		173,265,148
Total	$	78,203,059	$	59,191,897	$	94,345,006	$	231,739,962

Non-Performing Assets

Non-performing assets consist of non-performing loans and other real estate owned. Non-performing loans are composed of (1) loans on a non-accrual basis and (2) loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest and principal payments but have not been classified as non-accrual. Included in non-accrual loans are loans whose terms have been restructured to provide a reduction or deferral of interest and/or principal because of a deterioration in the financial position of the borrower and have not performed in accordance with the restructured terms.

The Bank’s policy with regard to non-accrual loans is that generally, loans are placed on a non-accrual status when they are 90 days past due, unless these loans are well secured and in the process of collection or, regardless of the past due status of the loan, when management determines that the complete recovery of principal or interest is in doubt. Consumer loans are generally charged off after they become 120 days past due. Subsequent payments on loans in non-accrual status are credited to income only if collection of principal is not in doubt.

Non-performing loans increased by $358,454 to $6,321,956 at December 31, 2013, from $5,963,502 at December 31, 2012 The major segment of non-accrual loans consists of commercial real estate loans which are in the process of collection. The table below sets forth non-performing assets and risk elements in the Bank’s portfolio for the years indicated.

Table of Contents


Non-Performing Assets and Loans
							December 31,
	2013			2012			2011			2010			2009
Non-performing loans :
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing	$	-		$	84,948		$	-		$	-		$	145,898
Nonaccrual loans		6,321,956			5,878,556			2,991,470			8,809,167			4,161,628
Total non-performing loans		6,321,956			5,963,504			2,991,470			8,809,167			4,307,526
Other real estate owned		2,136,341			8,332,601			12,409,201			4,850,818			1,362,621
Total non-performing assets		8,458,297			14,296,105			15,400,671			13,659,985			5,670,147
Performing troubled debt restructurings		3,858,796			2,011,646			773,890			-			1,105,905
Performing troubled debt restructurings and total non-performing assets	$	12,317,093		$	16,307,751		$	16,174,561		$	13,659,985		$	6,776,052

Non-performing loans to total loans		1.69	%		1.14	%		0.63	%		2.14	%		1.13	%
Non-performing loans to total loans excluding mortgage
warehouse lines		2.47	%		2.51	%		1.32	%		3.63	%		1.65	%

Non-performing assets to total assets		1.14	%		1.70	%		1.95	%		2.12	%		0.84	%
Non-performing assets to total assets excluding mortgage
warehouse lines		1.35	%		2.57	%		2.84	%		2.88	%		1.02	%

Total non-performing assets and performing troubled debt restructurings
to total assets		1.66	%		1.94	%		2.04	%		2.12	%		1.00	%

As the table demonstrates, while non-performing loans to total loans increased to 1.69% at December 31, 2013 from 1.14% at December 31, 2012, loan quality is still considered to be sound. This was accomplished through quality loan underwriting, a proactive approach to loan monitoring and aggressive workout strategies.

Non-performing assets decreased by $5,837,806 to $8,458,297 at December 31, 2013 from $14,296,103 at December 31, 2012. Other real estate owned decreased by $6,196,260 to $2,136,341 at December 31, 2013 from $8,332,601 at December 31, 2012. During 2013, the Bank was able to successfully dispose of properties with an aggregate carrying value of $8,039,089 for a net loss of $922,860. The Bank recorded loss provisions against other real estate owned properties of $758,625 during 2013 and $2,345,267 during 2012.

Non-performing assets represented 1.14% of total assets at December 31, 2013 compared to 1.70% at December 31, 2012.

At December 31, 2013, the Bank had eight loans totaling $4,232,070 that were troubled debt restructurings. Two of these loans totaling $373,274 are included in the above table as non-accrual loans and the remaining six loans totaling $3,858,796 are considered performing.

At December 31, 2012, the Bank had ten loans totaling $2,491,879 that were troubled debt restructurings. Five of these loans totaling $480,233 are included in the above table as non-accrual loans; the remaining five loans totaling $2,011,646 are considered performing.

Management takes a proactive approach in addressing delinquent loans. The Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer meets weekly with all loan officers to review the status of credits past-due ten days or more. An action plan is discussed for delinquent loans to determine the steps necessary to induce the borrower to cure the delinquency and restore the loan to a current status. Also, delinquency notices are system generated when loans are five days past-due and again at 15 days past-due.

In most cases, the Company’s collateral is real estate and when the collateral is foreclosed upon, the real estate is carried at the lower of fair market value less the estimated selling costs or the initially recorded amount. The amount, if any, by which the recorded amount of the loan exceeds the fair market value of the collateral less estimated selling costs is a loss which is charged to the allowance for loan losses at the time of foreclosure or repossession. Resolution of a past-due loan can be delayed if the borrower files a bankruptcy petition because a collection action cannot be continued unless the Company first obtains relief from the automatic stay provided by the bankruptcy code.

Allowance for Loan Losses and Related Provision

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level sufficient to absorb estimated credit losses in the loan portfolio as of the date of the financial statements. The allowance for loan losses is a valuation reserve available for losses incurred or inherent in the loan portfolio and other extensions of credit. The determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is a critical accounting policy of the Company.

The Company’s primary lending emphasis is the origination of commercial and commercial real estate loans and mortgage warehouse lines of credit. Based on the composition of the loan portfolio, the inherent primary risks are deteriorating credit quality, a decline in the economy, and a decline in New Jersey real estate market values. Any one, or a combination, of these events may adversely affect the loan portfolio and may result in increased delinquencies, loan losses and increased future provision levels.

Table of Contents

All, or part, of the principal balance of commercial and commercial real estate loans and construction loans are charged off against the allowance as soon as it is determined that the repayment of all, or part, of the principal balance is highly unlikely. Consumer loans are generally charged off no later than 120 days past due on a contractual basis, earlier in the event of bankruptcy, or if there is an amount deemed uncollectible. Because all identified losses are immediately charged off, no portion of the allowance for loan losses is restricted to any individual loan or groups of loans, and the entire allowance is available to absorb any and all loan losses.

Management reviews the adequacy of the allowance on at least a quarterly basis to ensure that the provision for loan losses has been charged against earnings in an amount necessary to maintain the allowance at a level that is adequate based on management’s assessment of probable estimated losses. The Company’s methodology for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses consists of several key elements and is consistent with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and interagency supervisory guidance. The allowance for loan losses methodology consists of two major components. The first component is an estimation of losses associated with individually identified impaired loans, which follows Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 310 (formerly SFAS 114). The second major component estimates losses under ASC Topic 450 (formerly SFAS 5), which provides guidance for estimating losses on groups of loans with similar risk characteristics. The Company’s methodology results in an allowance for loan losses which includes a specific reserve for impaired loans, an allocated reserve, and an unallocated portion.

When analyzing groups of loans under ASC 450, the Bank follows the Interagency Policy Statement on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses. The methodology considers the Company’s historical loss experience adjusted for changes in trends, conditions, and other relevant factors that affect repayment of the loans as of the evaluation date. These adjustment factors, known as qualitative factors, include:

Delinquencies and nonaccruals

Portfolio quality

Concentration of credit

Trends in volume of loans

Quality of collateral

Policy and procedures

Experience, ability, and depth of management

Economic trends – national and local

External factors – competition, legal and regulatory

The methodology includes the segregation of the loan portfolio into loan types with a further segregation into risk rating categories, such as special mention, substandard, doubtful, and loss. This allows for an allocation of the allowance for loan losses by loan type; however, the allowance is available to absorb any loan loss without restriction. Larger balance, non-homogeneous loans representing significant individual credit exposures are evaluated individually through the internal loan review process. It is this process that produces the watch list. The borrower’s overall financial condition, repayment sources, guarantors and value of collateral, if appropriate, are evaluated. Based on these reviews, an estimate of probable losses for the individual larger-balance loans are determined, whenever possible, and used to establish specific loan loss reserves. In general, for non-homogeneous loans not individually assessed and for homogeneous groups, such as residential mortgages and consumer credits, the loans are collectively evaluated based on delinquency status, loan type, and historical losses. These loan groups are then internally risk rated.

The watch list includes loans that are assigned a rating of special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss. Loans criticized special mention have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If uncorrected, the potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects. Loans classified substandard have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They include loans that are inadequately protected by the current sound net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans classified doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in loans classified substandard with the added characteristic that collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of current conditions and facts, is highly improbable. Loans rated as doubtful in whole, or in part, are placed in nonaccrual status. Loans classified as a loss are considered uncollectible and are charged off against the allowance for loan losses.

Table of Contents

The specific allowance for impaired loans is established for specific loans that have been identified by management as being impaired. These loans are considered to be impaired primarily because the loans have not performed according to payment terms and there is reason to believe that repayment of the loan principal in whole or in part, is unlikely. The specific portion of the allowance is the total amount of potential unconfirmed losses for these individual impaired loans. To assist in determining the fair value of loan collateral, the Company often utilizes independent third party qualified appraisal firms which in turn employ their own criteria and assumptions that may include occupancy rates, rental rates, and property expenses, among others.

The second category of reserves consists of the allocated portion of the allowance. The allocated portion of the allowance is determined by taking pools of loans outstanding that have similar characteristics and applying historical loss experience for each pool. This estimate represents the potential unconfirmed losses within the portfolio. Individual loan pools are created for commercial and commercial real estate loans, construction loans, warehouse lines of credit and various types of loans to individuals. The historical estimation for each loan pool is then adjusted to account for current conditions, current loan portfolio performance, loan policy or management changes, or any other qualitative factor which may cause future losses to deviate from historical levels.

The Company also maintains an unallocated allowance. The unallocated allowance is used to cover any factors or conditions which may cause a potential loan loss but are not specifically identifiable. It is prudent to maintain an unallocated portion of the allowance because no matter how detailed an analysis of potential loan losses is performed, these estimates by definition lack precision. Management must make estimates using assumptions and information that is often subjective and changing rapidly.

The following discusses the risk characteristics of each of our loan portfolio segments, commercial, mortgage warehouse lines of credit, and consumer.

Commercial

The Company’s primary lending emphasis is the origination of commercial and commercial real estate loans. Based on the composition of the loan portfolio, the inherent primary risks are deteriorating credit quality, a decline in the economy, and a decline in New Jersey real estate market values. Any one or a combination of these events may adversely affect the loan portfolio and may result in increased delinquencies, loan losses and increased future provision levels.

Mortgage Warehouse Lines of Credit

The Company’s Mortgage Warehouse Unit provides revolving lines of credit that are available to licensed mortgage banking companies. The Warehouse Line of Credit is used by the mortgage banker to originate one-to-four family residential mortgage loans that are pre-sold to the secondary mortgage market, which includes state and national banks, national mortgage banking firms, insurance companies and government-sponsored enterprises, including the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and others. On average, an advance under the Warehouse Line of Credit remains outstanding for a period of less than 30 days, with repayment coming directly from the sale of the loan into the secondary mortgage market. Interest (the spread between our borrowing cost and the rate charged to the client) and a transaction fee are collected by the Bank at the time of repayment. Additionally, customers of the Warehouse Lines of Credit are required to maintain deposit relationships with the Bank that, on average, represent 10% to 15% of the loan balances.

As a separate segment of the total portfolio, the warehouse loan portfolio is individually analyzed as a whole for allowance for loan losses purposes. Warehouse lines of credit are subject to the same inherent risks as other commercial lending, but the overall degree of risk differs. While the Company’s loss experience with this type of lending has been non-existent since the product was introduced in 2008; there are other risks unique to this lending that still must be considered in assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. These unique risks may include, but are not limited to, (i) credit risks relating to the mortgage bankers that borrow from us, (ii) the risk of intentional misrepresentation or fraud by any of such mortgage bankers, (iii) changes in the market value of mortgage loans originated by the mortgage banker, the sale of which is the expected source of repayment of the borrowings under a warehouse line of credit, due to changes in interest rates during the time in warehouse, or (iv) unsalable or impaired mortgage loans so originated, which could lead to decreased collateral value and the failure of a purchaser of the mortgage loan to purchase the loan from the mortgage banker.

Table of Contents

These factors, along with the other qualitative factors such as economic trends, concentrations of credit, trends in the volume of loans, portfolio quality, delinquencies and nonaccruals, are also considered and may have positive or negative effects on the allocated allowance. The aggregate amount resulting from the application of these qualitative factors determines the overall risk for the portfolio and results in an allocated allowance for warehouse lines of credit.

Consumer

The Company’s loan portfolio consumer segment is comprised of residential real estate loans, home equity loans and other loans to individuals. Individual loan pools are created for the various types of loans to individuals.

In general, for homogeneous groups such as residential mortgages and consumer credits, the loans are collectively evaluated based on delinquency status, loan type, and historical losses. These loan groups are then internally risk rated.

The Company considers the following credit quality indicators in assessing the risk in the loan portfolio:

Consumer credit scores

Internal credit risk grades

Loan-to-value ratios

Collateral

Collection experience

Table of Contents

The following table presents, for the years indicated, an analysis of the allowance for loan losses and other related data.

Allowance for Loan Losses
	2013			2012			2011			2010			2009
Balance, beginning of year	$	7,151,212		$	5,534,450		$	5,762,712		$	4,505,387		$	3,684,764

Provision charged to operating expenses		1,076,662			2,149,992			2,558,328			2,325,000			2,553,000

Loans charged off:
Construction loans		(561,993	)		(57,650	)		(2,361,783	)		(450,000	)		(1,226,754	)
Residential real estate loans		-			(130,694	)		-			-			-
Commercial and commercial real estate loans		(594,836	)		(275,888	)		(437,699	)		(609,468	)		(511,791	)
Loans to individuals		(51,910	)		(83,859	)					(22,087	)		(1,973)
Lease financing		-			-			-			-			-
All other loans		-			-			-			-			-
		(1,208,739	)		(548,091	)		(2,799,482	)		(1,081,555	)		(1,740,518	)
Recoveries:
Construction loans		417			3,403			8,951			-			-
Residential real estate loans		-			-			-			-			-
Commercial and commercial real estate loans		19,020			11,458			3,941			13,880			2,575
Loans to individuals		-			-			-			-			5,566
Lease financing		-			-			-			-			-
All other loans		-			-			-			-			-
		19,437			14,861			12,892			13,880			8,141

Net (charge offs)		(1,189,302	)		(533,230	)		(2,786,590	)		(1,067,675	)		(1,732,377	)

Balance, end of period	$	7,038,571		$	7,151,212		$	5,534,450		$	5,762,712		$	4,505,387

Loans:
At year end	$	373,336,082		$	521,814,110		$	475,431,771		$	411,987,339		$	379,945,735
Average during the year		248,126,605			444,064,283			362,289,390			387,575,677			384,314,052
Net charge offs to average loans outstanding		(0.48	%)		(0.12	%)		(0.77	%)		(0.28	%)		(0.45	%)
Allowance for loan losses to:
Total loans at year end		1.89	%		1.37	%		1.16	%		1.40	%		1.19	%
Total loans at year end excluding Mortgage warehouse lines and related allowance		2.52	%		2.41	%		1.95	%		2.06	%		1.52	%
Non-performing loans		111.34	%		119.92	%		185.01	%		65.42	%		104.59	%

At December 31, 2013, the allowance for loan losses was $7,038,571 compared to $7,151,212 at December 31, 2012, a decrease of $112,641. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to total loans at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was 1.89% and 1.37%, respectively. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non-performing loans was 111.34% at December 31, 2013 compared to 119.92% at December 31, 2012. Management believes that the quality of the loan portfolio remains sound, considering the economic climate and economy in the State of New Jersey, and that the allowance for loan losses is adequate in relation to credit risk exposure levels.

The following tables describe the allocation of the allowance for loan losses (“ALL”) among the various categories of loans and certain other information as of the dates indicated. The allocation is made for analytical purposes and is not necessarily indicative of the categories in which future losses may occur. The total allowance is available to absorb losses from any segment of loans.

Table of Contents


	December 31,
	2013								2012								2011
	Amount		ALL as a % of Loans			% of Loans			Amount		ALL as a % of Loans			% of Loans			Amount		ALL as a % of Loans			% of Loans

Commercial and commercial real estate	$	4,293,499		2.38	%		48	%	$	3,235,010		2.01	%		31	%	$	2,532,344		2.01	%		32	%
Construction loans		1,205,267		2.36	%		14	%		1,990,292		3.57	%		11	%		1,054,695		2.14	%		10	%
Residential real estate loans		164,673		1.20	%		4	%		112,103		1.03	%		2	%		91,076		0.71	%		3	%
Loans to individuals		111,032		1.14	%		3	%		104,854		1.07	%		2	%		189,729		1.52	%		3	%
Subtotal		5,774,471		2.26	%		68	%		5,442,259		2.41	%		46	%		3,867,844		1.95	%		48	%
Mortgage warehouse lines		584,757		0.50	%		31	%		1,420,638		0.50	%		54	%		1,122,056		0.45	%		52	%
Unallocated reserves		679,343		-			-			288,315		-			-			544,550		-			-

Total	$	7,038,571		1.89	%		100	%	$	7,151,212		1.37	%		100	%	$	5,534,450		1.16	%		100	%


	December 31,
	2010								2009
	Amount		ALL as a % of Loans			% of Loans			Amount		ALL as a % of Loans			% of Loans

Commercial and commercial real estate	$	2,695,859		1.79	%		36	%	$	1,486,659		0.96	%		40	%
Construction loans		1,744,068		2.57	%		16	%		1,739,332		2.18	%		21	%
Residential real estate loans		67,828		0.65	%		3	%		72,718		0.71	%		3	%
Loans to individuals		194,367		1.44	%		4	%		145,542		0.94	%		4	%
Subtotal		4,702,122		2.06	%		59	%		3,444,251		1.88	%		68	%
Mortgage warehouse lines		763,092		0.45	%		41	%		537,219		0.45	%		32	%
Unallocated reserves		297,498		-			-			523,917		-			-

Total	$	5,762,712		1.40	%		100	%	$	4,505,387		1.19	%		100	%

The allowance for loan losses excluding the portion related to mortgage warehouse lines increased to $5.8 million at December 31, 2013 from $5.4 million at December 31, 2012. This $0.4 million increase resulted from an increase of $1.0 million in the specific allowances for loan losses on commercial real estate loans that were individually evaluated for impairment offset by a $0.6 million decrease in the specific allowance on construction loans as a result of charge-offs of $561,993.

The allowance for loan losses excluding the portion related to mortgage warehouse lines increased to $5.4 million at December 31, 2012 from $3.8 million at December 31, 2011. This $1.6 million increase resulted from an $801,000 increase in specific allowances for loan losses on commercial, commercial real estate and construction loans that were individually evaluated for impairment. The remaining increase occurred primarily in the general allowance due to (1) an increase in the qualitative factors caused by a rise in criticized assets, which increased the general allowance by $639,000, and (2) a $16.3 million growth in outstanding commercial, commercial real estate and construction loans during 2012, which increased the general allowance by $274,000.

Deposits

Deposits, which include demand deposits (interest bearing and non-interest bearing), savings deposits and time deposits, are a fundamental and cost-effective source of funding. The flow of deposits is influenced significantly by general economic conditions, changes in market interest rates and competition. The Bank offers a variety of products designed to attract and retain customers, with the Bank’s primary focus being on the building and expanding of long-term relationships. Deposits for the year ended December 31, 2013 averaged $698,980,234, a decrease of $28,416,651, or 4.2%, compared to $670,563,583 for the year ended December 31, 2012. At December 31, 2013, total deposits were $638,552,030, a decrease of $69,137,445, or 9.8%, from $707,689,475 at December 31, 2012. The average rate paid on the Bank’s interest-bearing deposit balances for 2013 was 0.62%, a decrease from the 0.79% average rate for 2012.

Time deposits consist primarily of retail certificates of deposit and certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more. Time deposits at December 31, 2013 were $135,919,395, a decrease of $5,698,521 from $141,617,916 at December 31, 2012. The retail certificates of deposit component of time deposits decreased by $1,359,641, or 1.9%, to an average of $68,741,109 for 2013 from an average of $70,100,750 for 2012. The average cost of these deposits decreased to 1.25% for 2013 from 1.54% for 2012. Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more decreased by $4,910,386 to an average of $71,616,214 for 2013 from an average of $76,526,600 for 2012. Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more are a less stable funding source and are used primarily as an alternative to other sources of borrowed funds. For information concerning time deposits of $100,000 or more by time remaining until maturity, see Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

Average non-interest bearing demand deposits increased by $10,314,918, or 8.1%, to $137,872,991 for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $127,558,073 for the year ended December 31, 2012. At December 31, 2013, non-interest bearing demand deposits totaled $121,891,752, a decrease of 20.0% when compared to $152,334,759 at December 31, 2012. Non-interest bearing demand deposits made up 19.1% and 21.5% of total deposits at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and represent a stable, interest-free source of funds.

Savings accounts decreased by $22,258,064, or 11.0%, to $180,002,971 at December 31, 2013 from $202,261,035 at December 31, 2012. The average balance of savings accounts for 2013 increased by $5,209,987 to $198,168,724 compared to an average balance of $192,958,737 for 2012.

Interest bearing demand deposits, which include interest-bearing checking accounts, money market accounts and the Bank’s premier money market product, 1st Choice account, increased by $19,161,773, or 9.5%, to an average of $222,581,196 for 2013 from an average of $203,419,423 for 2012. The average cost of interest bearing demand deposits decreased 15 basis points to 0.34% for 2013 compared to 0.49% for 2012.

The following table illustrates the components of average total deposits for the dates indicated.



Average Deposit Balances
	2013					2012					2011
	Average Balance		Percentage of Total			Average Balance		Percentage of Total			Average Balance		Percentage of Total

Non-interest bearing demand deposits	$	137,872,991		20	%	$	127,558,073		19	%	$	117,876,295		19	%
Interest bearing demand deposits		222,581,196		32	%		203,419,423		30	%		172,790,166		28	%
Savings deposits		198,168,724		29	%		192,958,737		29	%		179,903,197		29	%
Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more		68,741,109		9	%		76,526,600		11	%		79,898,632		13	%
Other certificates of deposit		71,616,214		10	%		70,100,750		11	%		73,470,718		12	%
Total	$	698,980,234		100	%	$	670,563,583		100	%	$	623,939,008		100	%

Borrowings

Borrowings are mainly comprised of Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) borrowings and overnight funds purchased. These borrowings are primarily used to fund asset growth not supported by deposit generation. The average balance of other borrowed funds decreased by $7,519,851, or 42.2%, to $10,284,794 for the year ended December 31, 2013 from the average balance of $17,804,645 for the year ended December 31, 2012. The average cost of other borrowed funds increased 150 basis points to 4.03% for 2013 compared to 2.53% for 2012.

The balance of borrowings was $10,000,000 at December 31, 2013, consisting of a long-term FHLB advance of $10,000,000. The balance of borrowings at December 31, 2012 was $42,400,000, consisting of a long-term FHLB advance of $10,000,000 and overnight funds purchased of $32,400,000.

Shareholders’ Equity and Dividends

Shareholders’ equity increased by $3,304,782, or 5.1%, to $68,358,314 at December 31, 2013 from $65,053,532 at December 31, 2012. Tangible book value per common share was $10.55 at December 31, 2013 compared to $10.02 at December 31, 2012. The ratio of average shareholders’ equity to total average assets was 8.26%, 7.57% and 7.17% for 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. The increase in shareholders’ equity from December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2013 was primarily the result of net income of $5,780,088 for 2013, which was partially offset by the other comprehensive loss of $3,051,927 for the year.

The Federal Reserve Board has issued a supervisory letter to bank holding companies that contains guidance on when the board of directors of a bank holding company should eliminate or defer or severely limit dividends, including, for example, when net income available for shareholders for the past four quarters net of previously paid dividends paid during that period is not sufficient to fully fund the dividends. The letter also contains guidance on the redemption of stock by bank holding companies which urges bank holding companies to advise the Federal Reserve of any such redemption or repurchase of common stock for cash or other value which results in the net reduction of a bank holding company’s capital at the beginning of the quarter below the capital outstanding at the end of the quarter.

Table of Contents

In lieu of cash dividends, the Company (and its predecessor, the Bank) has declared a stock dividend every year for the years 1992 through 2012 and has paid such dividends every year for the years 1993 through 2013. No stock dividend was declared in 2013.

The Company’s common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “FCCY”.

The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. For information on regulatory capital, see Note 18 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The following table shows the amounts and expected maturities of significant commitments as of December 31, 2013. Further discussion of these commitments is included in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

	One Year or Less		One to Three Years		Three to Five Years		Over Five Years		Total
Standby letters of credit	$	2,212,009	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	2,212,009
Commitments to extend credit	$	328,167,129	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	328,167,129
Commitments to sell residential loans	$	23,701,689	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	23,701,689
Operating leases	$	948,922	$	1,562,080	$	1,344,633	$	1,701,268	$	5,556,903

Liquidity

At December 31, 2013, the amount of liquid assets remained at a level management deemed adequate to ensure that contractual liabilities, depositors’ withdrawal requirements, and other operational and customer credit needs could be satisfied.

Liquidity management refers to the Company’s ability to support asset growth while satisfying the borrowing needs and deposit withdrawal requirements of customers. In addition to maintaining liquid assets, factors such as capital position, profitability, asset quality and availability of funding affect a bank’s ability to meet its liquidity needs. On the asset side, liquid funds are maintained in the form of cash and cash equivalents, Federal funds sold, investment securities held to maturity maturing within one year, securities available for sale and loans held for sale. Additional asset-based liquidity is derived from scheduled loan repayments as well as investment repayments of principal and interest from mortgage-backed securities. On the liability side, the primary source of liquidity is the ability to generate core deposits. Short-term borrowings are used as supplemental funding sources when growth in the core deposit base does not keep pace with that of earnings assets.

The Bank has established a borrowing relationship with the FHLB which further supports and enhances liquidity. During 2010, FHLB replaced its Overnight Line of Credit and One-Month Overnight Repricing Line of Credit facilities available to member banks with a fully secured line of up to 50 percent of a bank’s quarter-end total assets. Under the terms of this facility, the Bank’s total credit exposure to FHLB cannot exceed 50 percent, or $371,162,543, of its total assets at December 31, 2013. In addition, the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Bank’s advances, letters of credit, the dollar amount of the FHLB’s minimum collateral requirement for off balance sheet financial contracts and advance commitments cannot exceed 30 percent of the Bank’s total assets, unless the Bank obtains approval from FHLB’s Board of Directors or its Executive Committee. These limits are further restricted by a member bank’s ability to provide eligible collateral to support its obligations to FHLB as well as a member bank’s ability to meet the FHLB’s stock requirement. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Bank had collateral at FHLB-NY to support additional borrowing of $76,255,003 and $61,358,015, respectively. The Bank also maintains an unsecured federal funds line of $20,000,000 with a correspondent bank.

The Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows present the changes in cash from operating, investing and financing activities. At December 31, 2013, the balance of cash and cash equivalents was $69,278,771.

Subsequent to the end of the third quarter of 2012, the Company completed its common stock rights offering, which expired on October 5, 2012. The Company received gross proceeds of $5.0 million from holders of subscription rights. The rights offering was fully subscribed. The Company used the proceeds from the rights offering for general corporate purposes.

Table of Contents

Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $36,496,256 for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to net cash used in operations of $5,588,032 for the year ended December 31, 2012. The primary source of funds was net income from operations, adjusted for activity related to loans originated for sale, the provision for loan losses, depreciation expenses and net amortization of premiums on securities. Cash was used in operations primarily for originating loans held for sale.

Net cash provided by investing activities totaled $119,782,494 for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to net cash used in investing activities of $38,670,566 for the year ended December 31, 2012. The net cash provided by investing activities for 2013 as compared to 2012 resulted from a decreased volume of loan closings during 2013.

Net cash used in financing activities totaled $101,044,900 for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $43,108,260 for the year ended December 31, 2012. The net cash used in financing activities in 2013 came primarily from the net decrease in deposits and repayment of borrowings. The net cash provided by financing activities in 2012 came primarily from an increase in deposits.

The securities portfolios are also a source of liquidity, providing cash flows from maturities and periodic repayments of principal. For the year ended December 31, 2013, prepayments and maturities of investment securities totaled $56,303,911. Another source of liquidity is the loan portfolio, which provides a flow of payments and maturities.

Subsequent to December 31, 2013, the Company paid approximately $14,770,000 as cash consideration for the merger of RFHB with and into the Bank. Such cash payment reduced the Company’s liquidity and the Company may seek to replenish this cash in a capital markets transaction.

Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis

The largest component of the Bank’s total income is net interest income, and the majority of the Bank’s financial instruments are composed of interest rate-sensitive assets and liabilities with various terms and maturities. The primary objective of management is to maximize net interest income while minimizing interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is derived from timing differences in the repricing of assets and liabilities, loan prepayments, deposit withdrawals and differences in lending and funding rates. Management actively seeks to monitor and control the mix of interest rate-sensitive assets and interest rate-sensitive liabilities.

The following tables set forth certain information relating to the Bank’s financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates, categorized by expected maturity or repricing and the fair value of such instruments at December 31, 2013.

Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis at December 31, 2013
													Total Within One Year			One Year to Five Years
( $ in thousands )	Interest Sensitivity Period																		Over Five Years		Non-interest Sensitive
	30 Day			90 Day			180 Day			365 Day									Over Five Years		Non-interest Sensitive			Total
Assets :
Cash and due from banks	$	58,951											$	58,951							$	10,316		$	69,267
Federal funds sold		11												11											11
Investment securities		5,628			12,556			7,628			17,797			43,609			94,754			113,653					252,016
Loans held for sale		10,924												10,924											10,924
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses		232,435			8,509			9,823			18,879			269,646			88,028			15,661		(7,038	)		366,297
Other assets																						43,810			43,810
	$	307,949		$	21,065		$	17,451		$	36,676		$	383,141		$	182,782		$	129,314	$	47,088		$	742,325
Sources of Funds :
Demand deposits - noninterest bearing																					$	121,892		$	121,892
Demand deposits - interest bearing		86,821												86,821			95,299			18,617					200,737
Savings deposits		105,764									28			105,792			39,248			34,993					180,033
Time deposits		5,947			15,811			22,636			23,820			68,214			67,676								135,890
Borrowings														0						10,000					10,000
Redeemable subordinated debentures					18,557									18,557											18,557
Non-interest-bearing sources																						75,216			75,216
	$	198,532		$	34,368		$	22,636		$	23,848		$	279,384		$	202,223		$	63,610	$	197,108		$	742,325

Asset (Liability) Sensitivity Gap :
Period Gap	$	109,417		$	(13,303	)	$	(5,185	)	$	12,828		$	103,757		$	(19,441	)	$	65,704	$	(150,020	)		-
Cumulative Gap	$	109,417		$	96,114		$	90,929		$	103,757		$	103,757		$	84,316		$	150,020		-			-
Cumulative Gap to Total Assets		14.7	%		12.2	%		12.2	%		14.0	%		14.0	%		11.4	%		-		-			-

Table of Contents

The Bank continually evaluates interest rate risk management opportunities, including the use of derivative financial instruments. Management believes that hedging instruments currently available are not cost-effective and, therefore, has focused its efforts on increasing the Bank’s spread by attracting lower-cost retail deposits.

In addition to utilizing the gap ratio for interest rate risk assessment, management utilizes simulation analysis whereby models estimate the variance in net income with a change in interest rates of plus or minus 200, 300 and 400 basis points over 12 and 24 month periods. Given recent simulations, net interest income would be within policy guidelines regardless of the direction of market rates.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Not required.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Reference is made to Item 15(a)(1) and (2) on page F-1 for a list of financial statements and supplementary data required to be filed pursuant to this Item 8. The information required by this Item 8 is provided beginning on page F-1 hereof.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

As previously disclosed by the Company in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2013 with the SEC, on June 28, 2013 (the “Notification Date”), the Company, after review and recommendation of the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, appointed BDO USA, LLP (“BDO”) as the Company’s new independent registered public accounting firm for and with respect to the year ended December 31, 2013, and dismissed ParenteBeard LLC (“ParenteBeard”) from that role. The Company’s principal audit personnel at ParenteBeard had resigned from ParenteBeard and joined BDO.

During the two years ended December 31, 2012, and from December 31, 2012 through the Notification Date, there were (i) no disagreements with ParenteBeard on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of ParenteBeard, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in its reports on the consolidated financial statements of the Company; and (ii) no “reportable events” (as such term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

The Company has established disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, with the assistance of other members of the Company’s management, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based upon such evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.

Table of Contents

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that the receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of its management and directors; and

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on its financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a control deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness; yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of the Company’s financial reporting.

The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on their assessment using those criteria, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2013, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.

The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have also concluded that there was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company's registered public accounting firm pursuant to the exemption provided to issuers that are not “large accelerated filers” or “accelerated filers”.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

Table of Contents

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the captions “Directors and Executive Officers”, “Corporate Governance” and “Stock Ownership of Management and Principal Shareholders.”

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the caption “Executive Compensation” and “Director Compensation.”

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the captions “Equity Plans” and “Stock Ownership of Management and Principal Shareholders.”

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

This information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the captions “Certain Transactions With Management” and “Corporate Governance.”

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the caption “Principal Accounting Fees and Services.”

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules

The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

Financial Statements of 1st Constitution Bancorp.

Consolidated Balance Sheets – December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Consolidated Statements of Income – For the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income – For the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity – For the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – For the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

These statements are incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Table of Contents

2.	All schedules are omitted because they are either inapplicable or not required, or because the information required therein is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto.

Exhibits

Exhibit No.			Description

3	(i)(A)		Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (conformed copy) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i)(A) to the Company’s Form 10-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on March 27, 2009)

3	(i)(B)		Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation increasing the number of shares designated as Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on December 23, 2008)

3	(i)(C)		Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation establishing the terms of the Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on December 23, 2008)

3	(ii)(A)		Bylaws of the Company (conformed copy) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii)(A) to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on October 22, 2007)

4.1			Specimen Share of Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 10-KSB (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on March 22, 2002)

4.2			Rights Agreement, dated as of March 18, 2004, between 1st Constitution Bancorp and Registrar and Transfer Company, as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Form 8-A12G (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on March 18, 2004)

4.3			Subscription Agent Agreement, dated as of September 5, 2012, between 1st Constitution Bancorp and Registrar and Transfer Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 6, 2012)

4.4			Warrant, dated November 23, 2011, to purchase shares of 1st Constitution Bancorp common stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to 1st Constitution’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 22, 2013)

4.5			Warrant, dated November 23, 2011, to purchase shares of 1st Constitution Bancorp common stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to 1st Constitution’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 22, 2013)

10.1		#	1st Constitution Bancorp Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated as of October 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-QSB (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on November 13, 2002)

10.2		#	Amended and Restated 1st Constitution Bancorp Directors’ Insurance Plan, effective as of June 16, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10 to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on March 24, 2006)

10.3		#	1st Constitution Bancorp Form of Executive Life Insurance Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 10-QSB (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on November 13, 2002)

Table of Contents

Exhibit No.			Description

10.4	#	2000 Employee Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 6.3 to the Company’s Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on June 15, 2001)

10.5	#	Directors Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 6.4 to the Company’s Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on June 15, 2001)

10.6	#	Amendment No. 1 to 1st Constitution Bancorp Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, effective January 1, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Form 10-Q (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on August 11, 2004)

10.7	#	Change of Control Agreement, effective as of April 1, 2004, by and between the Company and Joseph M. Reardon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s Form 10-Q (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on August 11, 2004)

10.8	#	Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 1st Constitution Bancorp Employee Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on December 22, 2004)

10.9	#	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the 1st Constitution Bancorp Employee Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on December 22, 2004)

10.10	#	The 1st Constitution Bancorp 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A of the Company's proxy statement (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on April 15, 2005)

10.11	#	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the 1st Constitution Bancorp 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Form 10-Q (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on August 8, 2005)

10.12	#	Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the 1st Constitution Bancorp 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Form 10-Q (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on August 8, 2005)

10.13	#	Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under the 1st Constitution Bancorp 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Form 10-Q (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on August 8, 2005)

10.14	#	1st Constitution Bancorp 2006 Directors Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on May 19, 2006)

10.15	#	Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the 1st Constitution Bancorp 2006 Directors Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on May 19, 2006)

Table of Contents

Exhibit No.			Description

10.16	#	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the 1st Constitution Bancorp 2006 Directors Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on May 19, 2006)

10.17		Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of 1st Constitution Capital Trust II, dated as of June 15, 2006, among 1st Constitution Bancorp, as sponsor, the Delaware and institutional trustee named therein, and the administrators named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on June 16, 2006)

10.18		Indenture, dated as of June 15, 2006, between 1st Constitution Bancorp, as issuer, and the trustee named therein, relating to the Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Debt Securities due 2036 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on June 16, 2006)

10.19		Guarantee Agreement, dated as of June 15, 2006, between 1st Constitution Bancorp and the guarantee trustee named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on June 16, 2006)

10.20	#	Amendment No. 2 to 1st Constitution Bancorp Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, effective as of December 31, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Company’s Form 10-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on April 15, 2008)

10.21	#	1st Constitution Bancorp 2005 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, effective as of January 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on December 28, 2006)

10.22	#	Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Robert F. Mangano dated as of July 1, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 14, 2010)

10.23	#	1st Constitution Bancorp 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the Company's proxy statement filed with the SEC on April 11, 2014)

10.24		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 14, 2013, by and between 1st Constitution Bancorp, 1st Constitution Bank and Rumson-Fair Haven Bank & Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 15, 2013).

10.25		First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated September 19, 2013, by and among the Company, 1st Constitution Bank and Rumson-Fair Haven Bank & Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 12, 2013).

14		Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14 to the Company’s Form 10-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on March 25, 2004)

21	*	Subsidiaries of the Company

23.1	*	Consent of BDO USA, LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

23.2	*	Consent of ParenteBeard LLC as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Table of Contents

Exhibit No.			Description

31.1	*	Certification of the principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)

31.2	*	Certification of the principal financial officer of the Company, pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)

32	*	Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer of the Company

101.INS	*	XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

* Filed herewith.

# Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

(b) Exhibits.

Exhibits required by Section 601 of Regulation S-K (see (a) above)

See the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

1st CONSTITUTION BANCORP

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-2

Consolidated Balance Sheets – December 31, 2013 and 2012	F-4

Consolidated Statements of Income – For the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012	F-5

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income – For the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012	F-6

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity – For the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012	F-7

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – For the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012	F-8

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-9

F-1

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

1st Constitution Bancorp

Cranbury, New Jersey

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of 1st Constitution Bancorp (the “Company”) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013, and the related consolidated statement of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended. The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of 1st Constitution Bancorp and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ BDO USA, LLP

Philadelphia, PA

March 31, 2014

F-2

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

1st Constitution Bancorp

Cranbury, New Jersey

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of 1st Constitution Bancorp and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended. The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of 1st Constitution Bancorp and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ PARENTEBEARD LLC

Allentown, Pennsylvania

March 22, 2013

F-3

Table of Contents

1st CONSTITUTION BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 2013 and 2012


	2013			2012
ASSETS

CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS	$	69,267,345		$	14,033,501

FEDERAL FUNDS SOLD / SHORT TERM INVESTMENTS		11,426			11,420

Total cash and cash equivalents		69,278,771			14,044,921

INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value		99,198,807			109,840,965
Investment securities held to maturity (fair value of $153,629,773 and $121,839,363 at December 31, 2013and 2012, respectively)		152,816,815			116,027,900
Total securities		252,015,622			225,868,865

LOANS HELD FOR SALE		10,923,689			35,960,262

LOANS		373,336,082			521,814,110
Less- Allowance for loan losses		(7,038,571	)		(7,151,212	)

Net loans		366,297,511			514,662,898

PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT, net		10,043,505			10,630,295

ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE		2,542,602			2,872,099

BANK-OWNED LIFE INSURANCE		16,183,574			15,026,506

OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED		2,136,341			8,332,601

GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS		4,889,575			5,157,542

OTHER ASSETS		8,013,897			8,412,393
Total assets	$	742,325,087		$	840,968,382

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

LIABILITIES:
Deposits
Non-interest bearing	$	121,891,752		$	152,334,759
Interest bearing		516,660,278			555,354,716
Total deposits		638,552,030			707,689,475

BORROWINGS		10,000,000			42,400,000
REDEEMABLE SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES		18,557,000			18,557,000
ACCRUED INTEREST PAYABLE		883,212			1,057,779
ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER LIABILITIES		5,974,531			6,210,596
Total liabilities		673,966,773			775,914,850

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock, no par value: 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued		-			-
Common stock, no par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 6,033,683 and 5,985,275 shares issued and 6,016,845 and 5,977,924 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively		49,403,450			48,716,032
Retained earnings		21,374,381			15,594,293
Treasury Stock 16,838 shares and, 7,351 shares at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively		(171,883	)		(61,086	)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income		(2,247,634	)		804,293
Total shareholders’ equity		68,358,314			65,053,532
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	742,325,087		$	840,968,382

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

F-4

Table of Contents

1st CONSTITUTION BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

For the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012

	2013		2012
INTEREST INCOME:
Loans, including fees	$	22,567,370	$	26,643,502
Securities:
Taxable		3,915,261		4,434,108
Tax-exempt		2,209,305		1,677,329
Federal funds sold and
short-term investments		300,061		81,697
Total interest income		28,991,997		32,836,636

INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits		3,487,918		4,314,703
Borrowings		414,904		450,462
Redeemable subordinated debentures		352,067		385,977

Total interest expense		4,254,889		5,151,142

Net interest income		24,737,108		27,685,494

PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES		1,076,662		2,149,992
Net interest income after provision
for loan losses		23,660,446		25,535,502

NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Service charges on deposit accounts		919,819		930,162
Gain on sales of securities available for sale		-		313,004
Gain on sales of loans		2,063,679		1,862,219
Income on Bank-owned life insurance		457,069		447,525
Other income		2,386,677		1,714,618
Total other income		5,827,244		5,267,528

NON-INTEREST EXPENSES:
Salaries and employee benefits		12,708,952		12,434,900
Occupancy expense		2,574,466		2,470,577
Data processing expenses		1,112,470		1,056,629
FDIC insurance expense		346,149		565,027
Other real estate owned expenses		352,927		3,553,779
Other operating expenses		4,327,276		3,689,649

Total other expenses		21,422,240		23,770,561
Income before income taxes		8,065,450		7,032,469

INCOME TAXES		2,285,362		1,971,965
Net income	$	5,780,088	$	5,060,504

NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
Basic	$	0.97	$	0.92
Diluted	$	0.95	$	0.90
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES
OUTSTANDING
Basic		5,973,323		5,511,114
Diluted		6,102,043		5,607,103

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

F-5

Table of Contents

1st Constitution Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012

	2013			2012

Net income	$	5,780,088		$	5,060,504

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax (1):

Unrealized holding (losses) gains on securities available for sale		(4,799,591	)		(198,328	)

Reclassification adjustment for realized gains on available
for sale securities included in net income		-			(313,004	)

Pension liability		193,017			12,880

Other comprehensive (loss), before income tax effect		(4,606,574	)		(498,452	)
Income tax effect		1,554,647			211,283
Other comprehensive (loss)		(3,051,927	)		(287,169	)

Comprehensive income	$	2,728,161		$	4,773,335

(1)

Unrealized holding losses on securities after tax were $3,179,729 and $131,392 for 2013 and 2012, respectively. Pension liability after tax was $127,874 and $8,533 for 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-6

Table of Contents

1st CONSTITUTION BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012

									Accumulated
									Other			Total
	Common		Retained			Treasury			Comprehensive			Shareholders'
	Stock		Earnings			Stock			(Loss) Income			Equity

BALANCE, January 1, 2012	$	40,847,929	$	13,070,606		$	(10,222	)	$	1,091,462		$	54,999,775


Exercise of stock options, and issuance of vested
shares under employee benefit programs		412,340					71,706						484,046

Share-based compensation		99,152											99,152

Treasury Stock reissued (purchased Share-based compensation							(122,570	)					(122,570	)
Shares issued in connection with Shareholders’ Rights program		4,819,794											4,819,794

5% stock dividend declared December 2012		2,536,817		(2,536,817	)								-

Net Income for the year ended December 31, 2012				5,060,504									5,060,504

Other comprehensive (loss)										(287,169	)		(287,169	)
BALANCE, December 31, 2012		48,716,032		15,594,293			(61,086	)		804,293			65,053,532



Exercise of stock options, net and issuance of vested
shares under employee benefit programs		603,342											603,342

Share-based compensation		84,076											84,076

Treasury stock purchased							(110,797	)					(110,797	)

Net Income for the year ended December 31, 2013				5,780,088									5,780,088

Other comprehensive (loss)										(3,051,927	)		(3,051,927	)
BALANCE, December 31, 2013	$	49,403,450	$	21,374,381		$	(171,883	)	$	(2,247,634	)	$	68,358,314

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

F-7

Table of Contents

1st CONSTITUTION BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012

	2013			2012
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	5,780,088		$	5,060,504
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities-
Provision for loan losses		1,076,662			2,149,992
Provision for loss on other real estate owned		758,625			2,345,267
Depreciation and amortization		1,071,219			1,172,625
Net amortization of premiums and discounts on securities		1,081,057			1,468,338
Gains on sales of securities available for sale		-			(313,004)
(Gains) losses on sales of other real estate owned		(922,860	)		13,347
Gains on sales of loans held for sale		(2,063,679	)		(1,862,219	)
Originations of loans held for sale		(138,980,555	)		(178,044,892	)
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale		166,080,807			163,180,960
Income on bank-owned life insurance		(457,069	)		(447,525	)
Share-based compensation expense		501,196			474,758
Deferred tax expense (benefit)		1,484,909			(1,792,342	)
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable		329,497			124,749
(Decrease) increase in other assets		1,166,991			(16,584	)
Decrease in accrued interest payable		(174,567	)		(128,732	)
(Decrease) increase in accrued expense and other liabilities		(236,065	)		1,026,726

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		36,496,256			(5,588,032	)

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

Purchases of securities -
Available for sale		(16,947,137	)		(57,242,330	)
Held to maturity		(71,384,179	)		(6,602,385	)
Proceeds from maturities and repayments
of securities -
Available for sale		22,346,133			34,468,644
Held to maturity		33,957,778			31,924,139
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale		-			6,074,598
Net (increase) in loans		144,698,709			(47,469,331	)
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance		(700,000	)		(1,000,000	)
Purchase of premises and equipment		(216,462	)		(1,095,649	)
Additional investment in other real estate owned		(11,437	)		(141,050	)
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned		8,039,089			2,412,798

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		119,782,494			(38,670,566	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

Exercise of stock options and issuance of vested shares		603,342			484,046
Purchase of Treasury Stock		(110,797	)		(122,570	)
Net increase (decrease) in demand, savings and time deposits		(69,137,445	)		83,826,990
Net (decrease) increase in short term borrowings		(32,400,000	)		(45,900,000	)
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock through Shareholder’s Rights Plan		-			4,819,794

Net cash (used in ) provided by financing activities		(101,044,900	)		43,108,260

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		55,233,850			(1,150,338	)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
AT BEGINNING OF YEAR		14,044,921			15,195,259

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
AT END OF YEAR	$	69,278,771		$	14,044,921

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the year for -
Interest	$	4,429,456		$	5,279,874
Income taxes		1,751,000			3,177,000
Non-cash investing activities
Real estate acquired in full satisfaction of loans in foreclosure	$	2,590,017			553,762

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

F-8

Table of Contents

1st CONSTITUTION BANCORP

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2013 and 2012

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

1st Constitution Bancorp (the “Company”) is a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and was organized under the laws of the State of New Jersey. The Company is parent to 1st Constitution Bank (the “Bank”), a state chartered commercial bank. The Bank provides community banking services to a broad range of customers, including corporations, individuals, partnerships and other community organizations in the central and northeastern New Jersey area. The Bank conducts its operations through its main office located in Cranbury, New Jersey and operated, as of December 31, 2013, thirteen additional branch offices in downtown Cranbury, Fort Lee, Hamilton Square, Hightstown, Hillsborough, Hopewell, Jamesburg, Lawrenceville, Perth Amboy, Plainsboro, Skillman, West Windsor, and Princeton, New Jersey.

The Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the balance sheet date of December 31, 2013 for items that should potentially be recognized or disclosed in these financial statements. The evaluation was conducted through the date these financial statements were issued.

Basis of Presentation

The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and to the accepted practices within the banking industry. The following is a description of the more significant of these policies and practices.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, the Bank, and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, 1st Constitution Investment Company of New Jersey, Inc., FCB Assets Holdings, Inc., 1st Constitution Title Agency, L.L.C., 204 South Newman Street Corp. and 249 New York Avenue, LLC. 1st Constitution Capital Trust II, a subsidiary of the Company (“Trust II”), is not included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as it is a variable interest entity and the Company is not the primary beneficiary. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation and certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, other-than-temporary security impairment, the fair value of other real estate owned and the valuation of deferred tax assets.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company and its subsidiaries to concentrations of credit risk primarily consist of investment securities and loans. At December 31, 2013, 71.2% of our investment securities consisted of U.S. Government and Agency issues, mortgage-backed securities and municipal bonds. In addition, another 12.7% of our portfolio consisted of highly rated collateralized mortgage obligations. The remaining 16.1% of our investment securities consisted primarily of corporate debt issues and restricted stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York. The Bank’s lending activity is primarily concentrated in loans collateralized by real estate located in the State of New Jersey. As a result, credit risk is broadly dependent on the real estate market and general economic conditions in that state.

F-9

Table of Contents

Interest Rate Risk

The Bank is principally engaged in the business of attracting deposits from the general public and using these deposits, together with other funds, to purchase securities and to make loans, the majority of which are secured by real estate. The potential for interest-rate risk exists as a result of the generally shorter duration of interest-sensitive assets compared to the generally longer duration of interest-sensitive liabilities. In a volatile rate environment, assets held by the Bank will re-price faster than liabilities of the Bank, thereby affecting net interest income. For this reason, management regularly monitors the maturity structure and rate adjustment features of the Bank’s assets and liabilities in order to measure its level of interest-rate risk and to plan for future volatility.

Investment Securities

Investment Securities which the Company has the intent and ability to hold until maturity are classified as held to maturity and are recorded at cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. Investment Securities which are held for indefinite periods of time, which management intends to use as part of its asset/liability management strategy, or that may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, changes in prepayment risk, increased capital requirements or other similar factors, are classified as available for sale and are carried at fair value, except for restricted stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York and Atlantic Central Banker Bank, which are carried at cost. Unrealized gains and losses on such securities are recorded as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses, which are computed using the specific identification method, are recognized on a trade date basis.

If the fair value of a security is less than its amortized cost, the security is deemed to be impaired. Management evaluates all securities with unrealized losses quarterly to determine if such impairments are temporary or other-than-temporary in accordance with the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). Temporary impairments on available for sale securities are recognized, on a tax-effected basis, through other comprehensive income (“OCI”) with offsetting adjustments to the carrying value of the security and the balance of related deferred taxes. Temporary impairments of held to maturity securities are not recorded in the consolidated financial statements; however, information concerning the amount and duration of impairments on held to maturity securities is disclosed.

Other-than-temporary impairments on all equity securities and on debt securities that the Company has decided to sell, or will, more likely than not, be required to sell prior to the full recovery of fair value to a level equal to or exceeding amortized cost, are recognized in earnings. If neither of these conditions regarding the likelihood of sale for a debt security apply, the other-than-temporary impairment is bifurcated into credit-related and noncredit-related components. Credit-related impairment generally represents the amount by which the present value of the cash flows that are expected to be collected on a debt security fall below its amortized cost. The noncredit-related component represents the remaining portion of the impairment not otherwise designated as credit-related. The Company recognizes credit-related other-than-temporary impairments in earnings. Noncredit-related other-than-temporary impairments on debt securities are recognized in OCI. For held to maturity debt securities, the amount of any other-than-temporary impairment recorded in OCI is amortized prospectively over the remaining lives of the securities based on the timing of future estimated cash flows related to those securities.

Premiums and discounts on all securities are amortized/accreted to maturity by use of the level-yield method considering the impact of principal amortization and prepayments.

Federal law requires a member institution of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) system to hold restricted stock of its district FHLB according to a predetermined formula. The Bank’s investment in the restricted stock of the FHLB of New York, while included in investment securities available for sale, is carried at cost.

Management evaluates the FHLB restricted stock for impairment in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Management’s determination of whether these investments are impaired is based on their assessment of the ultimate recoverability of their cost rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. The determination of whether a decline affects the ultimate recoverability of their cost is influenced by criteria such as (1) the significance of the decline in net assets of the FHLB as compared to the capital stock amount for the FHLB and the length of time this situation has persisted, (2) commitments by the FHLB to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to the operating performance of the FHLB, and (3) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on institutions and, accordingly, on the customer base of the FHLB. Management believes no impairment charge is necessary related to the FHLB stock as of December 31, 2013.

F-10

Table of Contents

Bank-Owned Life Insurance

The Company invests in bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”). BOLI involves the purchasing of life insurance by the Company on a chosen group of employees. The Company is the owner and beneficiary of the policies. This pool of insurance, due to the advantages of the Bank, is profitable to the Company. This profitability offsets a portion of future benefit costs and is intended to provide a funding source for the payment of future benefits. The Bank’s deposits fund BOLI and the earnings from BOLI are recognized as non-interest income.

Loans And Loans Held For Sale

Loans that management intends to hold to maturity are stated at the principal amount outstanding, net of unearned income. Unearned income is recognized over the lives of the respective loans, principally using the effective interest method. Interest income is generally not accrued on loans, including impaired loans, where interest or principal is 90 days or more past due, unless the loans are adequately secured and in the process of collection, or on loans where management has determined that the borrowers may be unable to meet contractual principal and/or interest obligations. When it is probable that, based upon current information, the Bank will not collect all amounts due under the contractual terms of the loan, the loan is reported as impaired. Smaller balance homogenous type loans, such as residential loans and loans to individuals, which are collectively evaluated, are excluded from consideration for impairment. Loan impairment is measured based upon the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the underlying fair value of collateral for collateral dependent loans. When a loan, including an impaired loan, is placed on non-accrual, interest accruals cease and uncollected accrued interest is reversed and charged against current income. Non-accrual loans are generally not returned to accruing status until principal and interest payments have been brought current and full collectibility is reasonably assured. Cash receipts on non-accrual and impaired loans are applied to principal, unless the loan is deemed fully collectible.

Loans held for sale are carried at the aggregate lower of cost or market value. Realized gains and losses on loans held for sale are recognized at settlement date and are determined based on the cost, including deferred net loan origination fees and the costs of the specific loans sold.

The Bank accounts for its transfers and servicing of financial assets in accordance with ASC Topic 860, “Transfers and Servicing.” The Bank originates mortgages under a definitive plan to sell those loans with servicing generally released. Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower aggregate cost or estimated fair value. Gains and losses on sales are also accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 860.

The Bank enters into commitments to originate loans whereby the interest rate on the loan is determined prior to funding (rate lock commitments). Rate lock commitments on mortgage loans that are intended to be sold are considered to be derivatives. Time elapsing between the issuance of a loan commitment and closing and sale of the loan generally ranges from 30 to 120 days. The Bank protects itself from changes in interest rates through the use of best efforts forward delivery contracts, whereby the Bank commits to sell a loan at the time the borrower commits to an interest rate with the intent that the buyer has assumed interest rate risk on the loan. As a result, the Bank is not exposed to losses nor will it realize significant gains related to its rate lock commitments due to changes in interest rates.

The market value of rate lock commitments and best efforts contracts is not readily ascertainable with precision because rate lock commitments and best efforts contracts are not actively traded in stand-alone markets. The Bank determines the fair value of rate lock commitments and best efforts contracts by measuring the change in the value of the underlying asset while taking into consideration the probability that the rate lock commitments will close. Due to high correlation between rate lock commitments and best efforts contracts, no gain or loss occurs on the rate lock commitments. Rate lock commitments and related derivative instruments were not deemed to be significant at December 31, 2013 and 2012 and therefore, not recorded on the balance sheet at December 31, 2013 and 2012.

F-11

Table of Contents

ASC Topic 460, “Guarantees,” requires a guarantor entity, at the inception of a guarantee covered by the measurement provisions of the interpretation, to record a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the financial performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support contracts entered into by customers. Most guarantees extend for one year. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Bank defines the fair value of these letters of credit as the fees paid by the customer or similar fees collected on similar instruments. The Bank amortizes the fees collected over the life of the instrument. The Bank generally obtains collateral, such as real estate or liens on customer assets for these types of commitments. The Bank’s potential liability would be reduced by any proceeds obtained in liquidation of the collateral held. The Bank had standby letters of credit for customers aggregating $2,212,029 and $1,620,362 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These letters of credit are primarily related to our real estate lending and the approximate value of underlying collateral upon liquidation is expected to be sufficient to cover this maximum potential exposure at December 31, 2013. The amount of the liability related to guarantees under standby letters of credit issued was not material as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Allowance for Loan Losses

All, or part, of the principal balance of commercial and commercial real estate loans and construction loans are charged off against the allowance as soon as it is determined that the repayment of all, or part, of the principal balance is highly unlikely. Consumer loans are generally charged off no later than 120 days past due on a contractual basis, or earlier in the event of bankruptcy, or if there is an amount deemed uncollectible. Because all identified losses are immediately charged off, no portion of the allowance for loan losses is restricted to any individual loan or groups of loans, and the entire allowance is available to absorb any and all loan losses.

Loans are placed in a nonaccrual status when the ultimate collectability of principal or interest in whole, or in part, is in doubt. Past-due loans contractually past-due 90 days or more for either principal or interest are also placed in nonaccrual status unless they are both well secured and in the process of collection. Impaired loans are evaluated individually.

The following is our charge-off policy by our loan segments:

Commercial

Loans are generally fully or partially charged down to the fair value of collateral securing the asset when:

Management judges the loan to be uncollectible;

Repayment is deemed to be protracted beyond reasonable time frames;

The loan has been classified as a loss by either internal loan review process or external examiners;

The customer has filed bankruptcy and the loss becomes evident owing to a lack of assets; or

The loan is significantly past due unless both well secured and in the process of collection.

Consumer

Consumer loans are generally charged off no later than 120 days past due on a contractual basis, earlier in the event of bankruptcy, or if there is an amount deemed uncollectible.

F-12

Table of Contents

Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed primarily on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets for financial reporting purposes and using the mandated methods by asset type for income tax purposes. Building, furniture and fixtures, equipment and leasehold improvements are depreciated or amortized over the estimated useful lives of the assets or lease terms, as applicable. Estimated useful lives of buildings are forty years, furniture and fixtures and equipment are three to fifteen years, and leasehold improvements are three to ten years. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.

The Company accounts for impairment of long lived assets in accordance with ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant, and Equipment,” which requires recognition and measurement for the impairment of long lived assets to be held and used or to be disposed of by sale. The Bank had no impaired long lived assets at December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Derivative Contracts

Derivative contracts, as required by ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging,” are carried at fair value as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial condition with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in a separate component of shareholders’ equity, net of related income tax effects. Gains and losses on derivative contracts are recognized upon realization utilizing the specific identification method.

Income Taxes

There are two components of income tax expense: current and deferred. Current income tax expense approximates cash to be paid or refunded for taxes for the applicable period. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized due to differences between the basis of assets and liabilities as measured by tax laws and their basis as reported in the financial statements. Deferred tax assets are subject to management’s judgment based upon available evidence that future realizations are likely. If management determines that the Company may not be able to realize some or all of the net deferred tax asset in the future, a charge to income tax expense may be required to reduce the value of the net deferred tax asset to the expected realizable value. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred tax expense or benefit is recognized for the change in deferred tax liabilities.

The Company accounts for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in its consolidated financial statements in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes,” which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, and also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company has not identified any significant income tax uncertainties through the evaluation of its income tax positions for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and has not recognized any liabilities for tax uncertainties as of December 31, 2013 and 2012. Our policy is to recognize interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense; such amounts were not significant during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. The tax years subject to examination by the taxing authorities are, for federal purposes, the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, and, for state purposes, the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010.

Other Real Estate Owned

Other real estate owned obtained through loan foreclosures or the receipt of deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure is carried at the lower of fair value of the related property, as determined by current appraisals less estimated costs to sell, or the recorded investment in the property. Write-downs on these properties, which occur after the initial transfer from the loan portfolio, are recorded as operating expenses. Costs of holding such properties are charged to expense in the current period. Gains, to the extent allowable, and losses on the disposition of these properties are reflected in current operations.

F-13

Table of Contents

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired in accordance with the purchase method of accounting. Goodwill is not amortized but is reviewed for potential impairment on an annual basis, or more often if events or circumstances indicated that there may be impairment, in accordance with ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other.” Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level and an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. Core deposit intangibles are a measure of the value of checking and savings deposits acquired in business combinations accounted for under the purchase method. Core deposit intangibles are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated lives (ranging from five to ten years) and identifiable intangible assets are evaluated for impairment if events and circumstances indicate a possible impairment. Any impairment loss related to goodwill and other intangible assets is reflected as other non-interest expense in the statement of operations in the period in which the impairment was determined. No assurance can be given that future impairment tests will not result in a charge to earnings. See Note 8 – Goodwill and Other Intangibles for additional information.

Share-Based Compensation

The Company recognizes compensation expense for stock awards and options in accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation.” The expense of stock-based compensation is generally measured at fair value at the grant date with compensation expense recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period. The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of each stock option on the date of grant. The Black-Scholes model takes into consideration the exercise price and expected life of the options, the current price of the underlying stock and its expected volatility, the expected dividends on the stock and the current risk-free interest rate for the expected life of the option. The Company’s estimate of the fair value of a stock option is based on expectations derived from historical experience and may not necessarily equate to its market value when fully vested. See Note 15 – Share-Based Compensation for additional information.

Benefit Plans

The Company provides certain retirement benefits to employees under a 401(k) plan. The Company’s contributions to the 401(k) plan are expensed as incurred.

The Company also provides retirement benefits to certain employees under supplemental executive retirement plans. The plans are unfunded and the Company accrues actuarial determined benefit costs over the estimated service period of the employees in the plans. In accordance with ASC Topic 715, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits,” the Company recognizes the underfunded status of these postretirement plans as a liability in its statement of financial position and recognizes changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through other comprehensive income.

Cash And Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand, interest and non-interest bearing amounts due from banks, Federal funds sold and short-term investments. Generally, Federal funds are sold and short-term investments are made for a one or two-day period.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period amounts to conform with the current period presentation. Such reclassification had no impact on net income or total shareholders’ equity.

Advertising Costs

It is the Company’s policy to expense advertising costs in the period in which they are incurred.

F-14

Table of Contents

Earnings Per Common Share

Basic net income per common share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period.

Diluted net income per common share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, as adjusted for the assumed exercise of potential common stock warrants, common stock options and unvested restricted stock awards (as defined below), using the treasury stock method.

All per share information has been restated for the effect of (i) a 5% stock dividend declared on December 20, 2012 and paid on January 31, 2013 to shareholders of record on January 14, 2013 and (ii) a 5% stock dividend declared December 15, 2011 and paid February 2, 2012 to shareholders of record on January 17, 2012. In addition, during the third quarter of 2012, the Company launched a shareholders’ common stock rights offering, which expired on October 5, 2012. The Company received gross proceeds of $5.0 million from holders of subscription rights who exercised their basic subscription rights and from holders who exercised the over-subscription privilege. The rights’ offering was fully subscribed. Accordingly, the Company issued a total of 555,555 shares of common stock to the holders of subscription rights who validly exercised their subscription rights, including pursuant to the exercise of the over-subscription privilege. The 555,555 shares issued in the shareholders’ common stock rights offering are included in the calculation of basic and diluted net income per common share for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

The following tables illustrate the reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per common share (EPS) calculations. Dilutive securities in the tables below exclude common stock options and warrants with exercise prices that exceed the average market price of the Company’s common stock during the periods presented. Inclusion of these common stock options and warrants would be anti-dilutive to the diluted earnings per common share calculation.

	Year Ended December 31, 2013
	Income		Weighted- average shares		Per share Amount
Basic earnings per common share:
Net income	$	5,780,088		5,973,323	$	0.97

Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options and unvested stock awards				128,720

Diluted EPS:
Net income plus assumed conversion	$	5,780,088		6,102,043	$	0.95

	Year Ended December 31, 2012
	Income		Weighted- average shares		Per share Amount
Basic earnings per common share:
Net income	$	5,060,504		5,511,114	$	0.92

Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options and unvested stock awards				95,989

Diluted EPS:
Net income plus assumed conversion	$	5,060,504		5,607,103	$	0.90

F-15

Table of Contents

For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, 78,596 and 108,174 options, respectively, were anti-dilutive and were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share.

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income includes unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale, other-than-temporary non-credit related security impairments, unrealized gains and losses on cash flows hedges, and changes in the funded status of benefit plans which are also recognized in equity.

Variable Interest Entities

Management has determined that Trust II qualifies as a variable interest entity under ASC Topic 810, “Consolidation.” Trust II issued mandatorily redeemable preferred stock to investors, loaned the proceeds to the Company and holds, as its sole asset, subordinated debentures issued by the Company. As a qualified variable interest entity, Trust II’s Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations have never been consolidated with those of the Company.

In March 2005, the Federal Reserve Board adopted a final rule that would continue to allow the inclusion of trust preferred securities in Tier 1 capital, but with stricter quantitative limits. Under the final rule, after a five-year transition period, the aggregate amount of trust preferred securities and certain other capital elements would be limited to 25% of Tier 1 capital elements, net of goodwill. The amount of trust preferred securities and certain other elements in excess of the limit could be included in Tier 2 capital, subject to restrictions. Based on the final rule, the Company has included all of its $18.0 million in trust preferred securities in Tier 1 capital at December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Segment Information

U.S. GAAP establishes standards for public business enterprises to report information about operating segments in their annual financial statements and requires that those enterprises report selected information about operating segments in subsequent interim financial reports issued to shareholders. It also established standards for related disclosure about products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. Operating segments are components of an enterprise, which are evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision-maker in deciding how to allocate and assess resources and performance. The Company’s chief operating decision-maker is the President and Chief Executive Officer. The Company has applied the aggregation criteria for its operating segments to create one reportable segment, “Community Banking.”

The Company’s Community Banking segment consists of construction, commercial, retail and mortgage banking. The Community Banking segment is managed as a single strategic unit, which generates revenue from a variety of products and services provided by the Company. For example, construction and commercial lending is dependent upon the ability of the Company to fund itself with retail deposits and other borrowings and to manage interest rate and credit risk. This situation is also similar for consumer and residential real estate lending.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements.

ASU 2011-11 (Disclosures about offsetting Assets and Liabilities)

On December 19, 2011, The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-11, “Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.” This new guidance affects all entities with financial instruments or derivatives that are either presented on a net basis in the balance sheet or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or a similar arrangement. The ASU does not change existing offsetting criteria in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) or the permitted balance sheet presentation for items meeting the criteria. To help financial statement users better assess the effect or potential effect of offsetting arrangements on an entity’s financial position, the new guidance requires disclosures in the financial statement notes that provide both net and gross information about assets and liabilities that have been offset and the related arrangements.

F-16

Table of Contents

The new disclosure requirements in the ASU are intended to enhance comparability between financial statements prepared using U.S. GAAP and those prepared in accordance with international Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The eligibility criteria for offsetting are different in U.S. GAAP and IFRS. In January 2011, the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board issued an exposure draft proposing new common criteria for offsetting, but the boards could not agree. The FASB voted to retain existing U.S. GAAP guidance on offsetting and to require expanded disclosures for financial instruments and derivative instruments that are either offset in the balance sheet or eligible for offset subject to a master netting arrangement or similar arrangement.

The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. Disclosures required by the amendments should be provided retrospectively for all comparative periods. The FASB has published a short recap highlighting the significant issues the ASU addresses. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

ASU 2011-05, 2001-12 and 2013-12 (Presentation of Comprehensive Income)

The provisions of ASU 2011-05 amend FASB ASC Topic 220, Comprehensive Income, to facilitate the continued alignment of U.S. GAAP with International Accounting Standards. The ASU prohibits the presentation of the components of comprehensive income in the statement of shareholders’ equity. Reporting entities are allowed to present either: a statement of comprehensive income, which reports both net income and other comprehensive income; or separate, but consecutive, statements of net income and other comprehensive income. Under previous GAAP, all three presentations were acceptable. Regardless of the presentation selected, the reporting entity is required to present all reclassifications between other comprehensive and net income on the face of the new statement or statements. The provisions of this ASU are effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 31, 2011 for public entities. The Company adopted this update on January 1, 2012 and the new Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income are included in these financial statements.

ASU 2011-12, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”) in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05,” was issued by the FASB on December 23, 2011. This ASU defers the implementation of only those provisions in ASU 2011-05, dealing only with the presentation of items reclassified out of AOCI.

The amendments in ASU 2011-12 and ASU 2011-05 are effective at the same time: For public entities, the guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The requirements are effective for nonpublic entities for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2012. The FASB has published a short recap of the reasons for the ASU 2011-12 deferrals. The adoption of this guidance did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The amendments in this ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP.

The amendments of ASU 2013-02 are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012 for public companies and are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013 for nonpublic companies. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

F-17

Table of Contents

2. Investment Securities

Amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and the estimated fair value by security type are as follows:

				Gross			Gross
	Amortized			Unrealized			Unrealized				Fair
2013	Cost			Gains			Losses				Value

Available for sale-
U. S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. Government sponsored
corporations (“GSE”) and agencies		$	22,386,761		$	33,213		$	(910,274	)		$	21,509,700
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations - GSE			3,547,404			134,388			-				3,681,792
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations – non- GSE			2,782,843			52,227			(8,674	)			2,826,396
Residential mortgage backed securities – GSE			31,532,051			872,169			(438,273	)			31,965,947
Obligations of State and
Political subdivisions			22,206,959			149,959			(2,710,874	)			19,646,044
Trust preferred debt securities – single issuer			2,468,839			-			(455,739	)			2,013,100
Corporate debt securities			16,228,474			318,590			(29,336	)			16,517,728
Restricted Stock			1,013,100			-			-				1,013,100
Mutual Fund			25,000			-			-				25,000
		$	102,191,431		$	1,560,546		$	(4,553,170	)		$	99,198,807

	Amortized Cost		Other-Than- Temporary Impairment Recognized In Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Carrying Value		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value

Held to maturity-
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored
Corporations (“GSE”) and agencies	$	1,524,860		-		$	1,524,860	$	10,310		-		$	1,535,170
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations – GSE		14,803,739		-			14,803,739		379,815		-			15,183,554
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations-non GSE		10,682,363		-			10,682,363		119,777		(27,526	)		10,774,614
Residential mortgage Backed securities -GSE		65,240,620		-			65,240,620		611,062		(387,034	)		65,464,648
Obligations of State and
Political subdivisions		59,400,916		-			59,400,916		1,399,938		(1,296,357	)		59,504,497
Trust preferred debt securities - pooled		656,662		(500,944	)		155,718		-		(6,863	)		148,855
Corporate debt securities		1,008,599		-			1,008,599		9,836		-			1,018,435

	$	153,317,759	$	(500,944	)	$	152,816,815	$	2,530,738	$	(1,717,780	)	$	153,629,773

F-18

Table of Contents

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
2012	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value

Available for sale-
U. S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. Government
Sponsored corporations (“GSE”) and agencies	$	29,384,595	$	137,847	$	(26,907)	$	29,495,535
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations- GSE		6,349,310		283,355		-		6,632,665
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations- non GSE		3,811,933		119,323		(7,074)		3,924,182
Residential mortgage backed securities – GSE		24,912,948		1,576,387		-		26,489,335
Obligations of State and Political subdivisions		20,793,222		375,416		(486,337)		20,682,301

Trust preferred debt securities – single issuer		2,466,009		-		(467,643)		1,998,366
Corporate debt securities		17,797,681		325,731		(23,131)		18,100,281
Restricted Stock		2,493,300		-		-		2,493,300
Mutual fund		25,000		-		-		25,000

	$	108,033,998	$	2,818,059	$	(1,011,092)	$	109,840,965

	Amortized Cost		Other-Than- Temporary Impairment Recognized In Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Carrying Value		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value

Held to maturity-
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored
Corporations (“GSE”) and agencies	$	3,073,957		-		$	3,073,957	$	33,213		-		$	3,107,170
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations – GSE		19,660,625		-			19,660,625		1,021,556		-			20,682,181
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations-non GSE		13,387,974		-			13,387,974		796,892		(289	)		14,184,577
Residential mortgage Backed securities -GSE		19,950,190		-			19,950,190		849,040		(944	)		20,798,286
Obligations of State and
Political subdivisions		42,815,706					42,815,706		3,039,935		-			45,855,641
Trust preferred debt securities - pooled		656,662		(500,944	)		155,718		-		(9,638	)		146,080
Corporate debt securities		16,983,730		-			16,983,730		84,443		(2,745	)		17,065,428

	$	116,528,844	$	(500,944	)	$	116,027,900	$	5,825,079	$	(13,616	)	$	121,839,363

F-19

Table of Contents

The carrying value and estimated fair value of investment securities at December 31, 2013, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Restricted stock is included in “Available for sale - Due in one year or less.”

	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Available for sale-
Due in one year or less
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of US Government sponsored corporations (“GSE”) and agencies	$	4,999,345	$	5,001,550
Residential mortgage backed securities-GSE		2,753		2,769
Obligations of State and Political subdivisions		110,000		110,322
Corporate debt securities		1,009,258		1,011,685
Restricted stock		1,013,100		1,013,100
Mutual fund		25,000		25,000
	$	7,159,456	$	7,164,426

Due after one year through five years
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of US Government sponsored corporations (“GSE”) and agencies	$	6,517,670	$	6,516,070
Residential mortgage backed securities-GSE		7,079,770		6,962,402
Obligations of State and Political subdivisions		374,402		375,815
Corporate debt securities		14,133,770		14,449,933
	$	28,105,612	$	28,304,220

Due after five years through ten years
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of US Government sponsored corporations (“GSE”) and agencies	$	10,869,746	$	9,992,080
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations-GSE		123,301		131,996
Residential mortgage backed securities-GSE		8,106,769		8,151,463
Obligations of State and Political subdivisions		4,249,720		4,163,057
	$	23,349,536	$	22,438,596

Due after ten years
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations-GSE	$	3,424,103	$	3,549,796
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations-non GSE		2,782,843		2,826,396
Residential mortgage backed securities-GSE		16,342,759		16,849,313
Obligations of State and Political subdivisions		17,472,837		14,996,850
Corporate debt securities		1,085,446		1,056,110
Trust preferred debt securities		2,468,839		2,013,100
	$	43,576,827	$	41,291,565

Total	$	102,191,431	$	99,198,807

F-20

Table of Contents

Held to maturity-
Due in one year or less
Obligations of US Government sponsored corporations (“GSE”) and agencies	$	1,524,860	$	1,535,170
Obligations of State and Political subdivisions		6,398,314		6,403,395
Corporate debt securities		1,008,599		1,018,435
	$	8,931,773	$	8,957,000


Due after one year through five years
Obligations of US Government sponsored corporations (“GSE”) and agencies	$	-	$	-
Obligations of State and Political subdivisions		11,538,560		11,900,078
Corporate debt securities		-		-
	$	11,538,660	$	11,900,078


Due after five years through ten years
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations-GSE	$	47,001	$	47,265
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations- non GSE		915,452		909,965
Residential mortgage backed securities-GSE		21,939,890		22,016,399
Obligations of State and Political subdivisions		21,469,445		22,088,136
	$	44,371,788	$	45,061,765


Due after ten years
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations-GSE	$	14,756,736	$	15,136,289
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations-non GSE		9,766,913		9,864,649
Residential mortgage backed securities-GSE		46,300,730		43,448,249
Obligations of State and Political subdivisions		19,994,497		19,112,888
Trust preferred debt securities		656,662		148,855
	$	88,475,538	$	87,710,930


Total	$	153,317,759	$	153,629,773

Gross unrealized losses on available for sale and held to maturity securities and the estimated fair value of the related securities aggregated by security category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:

F-21

Table of Contents

2013			Less than 12 months					12 months or longer					Total
	Number of Securities		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses

U.S. Government sponsored corporations and agencies		3	$	11,507,350	$	(910,274	)		-		-		$	11,507,350	$	(910,274	)

Residential collateralized mortgage obligations-non-GSE		8		5,328,485		(28,231	)		1,094,754		(7,969	)		6,423,239		(36,200	)

Residential mortgage backed securities GSE		38		40,504,327		(825,307	)		-		-			40,504,327		(825,307	)

Obligations of State and Political subdivisions		95		19,403,457		(2,285,759	)		8,936,441		(1,721,472	)		28,339,898		(4,007,231	)

Trust preferred debt securities – single issuer		4		-		-			2,013,100		(455,739	)		2,013,100		(455,739	)

Trust preferred debt securities – pooled		1		-		-			148,855		(507,807	)		146,855		(507,807	)

Corporate debt securities		1		-		-			1,056,110		(29,336	)		1,056,110		(29,336	)

Total temporarily impaired securities		150	$	76,743,619	$	(4,049,571	)	$	13,249,260	$	(2,722,323	)	$	89,992,879	$	(6,771,894	)

2012			Less than 12 months					12 months or longer					Total
	Number of Securities		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses

U.S. Government sponsored corporations and agencies		1	$	9,842,200	$	(26,907	)		-		-		$	9,842,200	$	(26,907	)

Residential collateralized mortgage obligations-non-GSE		3		1,960,237		(4,516	)		156,505		(2,847	)		2,116,742		(7,363	)

Residential mortgage backed securities GSE		2		3,989,675		(944	)		-		-			3,989,675		(944	)

Obligations of State and Political subdivisions		37		12,794,007		(486,337	)		-		-			12,794,007		(486,337	)

Trust preferred debt securities – single issuer		4		-		-			1,998,366		(467,643	)		1,998,366		(467,643	)

Trust preferred debt securities – pooled		1		-		-			146,080		(510,582	)		146,080		(510,582	)

Corporate debt securities		5		3,176,328		(25,876	)		-		-			3,176,328		(25,876	)

Total temporarily impaired securities		53	$	31,762,447	$	(544,580	)	$	2,300,951	$	(981,072	)	$	34,063,398	$	(1,525,652	)

F-22

Table of Contents

U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government sponsored corporations and agencies: The Unrealized losses on investments in these securities were caused by interest rate increases. The contractual terms of these investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost of the investment. Because the Company does not intend to sell these investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell these investments before a market price recovery or maturity, these investments are not considered other-than temporarily impaired.

Residential collateralized mortgage obligations and residential mortgage-backed securities: The unrealized losses on investments in residential collateralized mortgage obligations and residential mortgage-backed securities were caused by interest rate increases. The contractual cash flows of these securities are guaranteed by the issuer, primarily government or government sponsored agencies. It is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the amortized cost of the investment. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and because the Company does not intend to sell these investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell these investments before a market price recovery or maturity, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

Obligations of State and Political Subdivisions: The unrealized losses on investments in these securities were caused by interest rate increases. It is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the amortized cost of the investment. In addition, none of the issuers has defaulted on interest payments. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and because the Company does not intend to sell these investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell these investments before a market price recovery or maturity, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

Trust preferred debt securities – single issuer: The investments in these securities with unrealized losses are comprised of four corporate trust preferred securities issued by two large financial institutions that mature in 2027. The contractual terms of the trust preferred securities do not allow the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the face value of the trust preferred securities, which is greater than the amortized cost of the trust preferred securities. Both of the issuers continue to maintain investment grade credit ratings and neither has defaulted on interest payments. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to the widening of interest rate spreads and the lack of an active trading market for these securities and, to a lesser degree, market concerns on the issuers’ credit quality, and because the Company does not intend to sell these investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell these investments before a market price recovery or maturity, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

Corporate debt securities. The unrealized losses on investments in corporate debt securities were caused by interest rate increases. None of the corporate issuers have defaulted on interest payments. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and because the Company does not intend to sell these investments before a market price recovery or maturity, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

Trust preferred debt securities-pooled: This trust preferred debt security was issued by a two issuer pool (Preferred Term Securities XXV, Ltd. Co-issued by Keefe, Bruyette and Woods, Inc. and First Tennessee (“PRETSL XXV”), consisting primarily of financial institution holding companies. During 2009, the Company recognized an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $864,727, of which $363,783 was determined to be a credit loss and charged to operations and $500,944 was recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) component of shareholders’ equity.

The primary factor used to determine the credit portion of the impairment loss to be recognized in the income statement for this security was the discounted present value of projected cash flow where that present value of cash flow was less than the amortized cost basis of the security. The present value of cash flow was developed using an EITF 99-20 model that considered performing collateral ratios, the level of subordination to senior tranches of the security, credit ratings of and projected credit defaults in the underlying collateral.

F-23

Table of Contents

On a quarterly basis, management evaluates this security to determine if any additional other-than-temporary impairment is required. As of December 31, 2013, our evaluation was as follows:

We obtained the PRETSL XXV Depository Institutions Issuer List as of December 31, 2013 from the FTN Financial Corp. (“FTN”) website and reviewed the financial ratios and capital levels of each individual financial institution issuer.

We sorted the financial institutions on the issuer list to develop three “buckets” (or categories) for further deferred/default analysis based upon the indicated “Texas Ratio.” The Texas Ratio is calculated by dividing the institution’s Non-Performing Assets plus loans 90 days past due by the combined total of Tangible Equity plus the Allowance for Loan Losses. The three buckets consisted of those institutions with a Texas Ratio of:

(1)

Above 100;

(2)

75 to 100; and

(3)

Below 75.

We then applied the following asset specific deferral/default assumptions to each of these buckets:

(1)

Above 100 - 100% default; 0% recovery;

(2)

75 to 100 – 100% deferred; 15% recovery at 2 years from initial date of

deferral; and

(3)

Below 75 – no deferral/default.

We then ran a cash flow projection to analyze the impact of future deferral/default activity by applying the following assumption on those institutions in bucket (3) of our analysis:

Defaults at 75 basis points applied annually; 15% recovery with a 2-year lag from the initial date of deferral.

Our rationale for these metrics is as follows: (1) The FDIC lists the number of bank failures each year from 1934 – 2008. Comparing bank failures to the number of FDIC institutions produces an annual average default rate of 36 basis points. Given the continuing uncertain economic environment, we believe the doubling of this amount, or 75 basis points, to be an appropriate measurement for defaults; and (2) Standard & Poor’s published “Global Methodology for Rating Trust Preferred/Hybrid Securities Revised” on November 21, 2008. This analysis uses a recovery assumption of 15%, which we also deem an appropriate measurement.

Our position is that it is appropriate to apply this future default factor in our analysis as it is not realistic to assume no adverse conditions will occur over the remaining 26-year stated maturity of this pooled security even though the individual institutions are currently performing according to terms.

This December 31, 2013 projection of future cash flows produced a present value factor that exceeded the carrying value of the pooled trust preferred security; therefore, management concluded that no other-than-temporary impairment issues were present at December 31, 2013.

F-24

Table of Contents

A number of factors could cause management to conclude in one or more future reporting periods that an unrealized loss that exists with respect to PRETSL XXV constitutes an additional credit impairment. These factors include, but are not limited to, failure to make interest payments, an increase in the severity of the unrealized loss, an increase in the continuous duration of the unrealized loss without an impairment in value or changes in market conditions and/or industry or issuer specific factors that would render management unable to forecast a full recovery in value. In addition, the fair value of trust preferred securities could decline if the overall economy and the financial condition of the issuers continue to deteriorate and there remains limited liquidity for this security.

The following table sets forth information with respect to this security at December 31, 2013:

Security	Class	Book Value	Fair Value	Unrealized Gain (Loss)	Percent of Underlying Collateral Performing	Percent of Underlying Collateral In Deferral (1)	Percent of Underlying Collateral In Default (1)	Expected Deferrals and Defaults as a % of Remaining Performing Collateral	Moody's / S&P Ratings	Excess Subordination (2)
										Amount	% of Current Performing Collateral
PreTSL XXV	B-1	$656,662	$148,855	($507,807)	67.0%	10.4%	22.6%	13.6%	C/NR	$114,000	22.0%

Notes to table above:

(1)	This percentage represents the amount of specific deferrals / defaults that have occurred, plus those that are known for the following quarters to the total amount of original collateral. Fewer deferrals / defaults produce a lower percentage.

(2)

“Excess subordination” amount is the additional defaults / deferrals necessary in the next reporting period to deplete the entire credit enhancement (excess interest and over-collateralization) beneath our tranche within each pool to the point that would cause a “break in yield”. This amount assumes that all currently performing collateral continues to perform. A break in yield means that our security would not be expected to receive all the contractual cash flows (principal and interest) by maturity. The “percent of underlying collateral performing” is the ratio of the “excess subordination amount” to current performing collateral - a higher percentage means there is more excess subordination to absorb additional defaults / deferrals, and the better our security is protected from loss.

The Company regularly reviews the composition of the investment securities portfolio, taking into account market risks, the current and expected interest rate environment, liquidity needs, and its overall interest rate risk profile and strategic goals.

3. Loans and Loans Held for Sale

Loans are as follows:

	2013		2012

Commercial business	$	82,348,055	$	57,865,436
Commercial real estate		98,389,730		102,412,694
Mortgage warehouse lines		116,951,357		284,127,530
Construction loans		51,002,172		55,691,393
Residential real estate loans		13,764,178		10,897,307
Loans to individuals		9,766,114		9,643,385
All other loans		170,526		189,279
Gross Loans		372,392,132		520,827,024
Deferred loan costs		943,950		987,086
	$	373,336,082	$	521,814,110

The Bank’s business is concentrated in New Jersey, particularly Middlesex, Mercer and Somerset Counties and the Fort Lee area of Bergen County. A significant portion of the total loan portfolio is secured by real estate or other collateral located in these areas.

F-25

Table of Contents

The Bank had residential mortgage loans held for sale of $10,923,689 at December 31, 2013 and $35,960,262 at December 31, 2012. The Bank sells residential mortgage loans in the secondary market on a non-recourse basis. The related loan servicing rights are generally released to the purchaser. Loans held for sale at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were residential mortgage loans that the Bank intends to sell under forward contracts providing for delivery to purchasers generally within a two month period. Changes in fair value of the forward sales contracts, and the related loan origination commitments and closed loans, were not significant at December 31, 2013 and 2012.

4. Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality Disclosures

The following table provides an aging of the loan portfolio by loan class at December 31, 2013:

	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		Greater than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans Receivable		Recorded Investment > 90 Days Accruing		Nonaccrual Loans

Commercial
Construction	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	51,002,172	$	51,002,172	$	-	$	-
Commercial Business		385,133		58,665		453,325		897,123		81,450,932		82,348,055		-		511,990
Commercial Real Estate		-		-		5,217,173		5,217,173		93,172,557		98,389,730		-		5,555,851
Mortgage Warehouse Lines		-		-		-		-		116,951,357		116,951,357		-		-

Residential Real Estate		315,615		967,099		33,494		1,316,208		12,447,970		13,764,178		-		162,012

Consumer
Loans to Individuals		-		-		-		-		9,766,114		9,766,114		-		92,103
Other		-		-		-		-		170,526		170,526		-		-

Deferred Loan Fees		-		-		-		-		943,950		943,950		-		-

Total	$	700,748	$	1,025,764	$	5,703,992	$	7,430,504	$	365,905,578	$	373,336,082	$	-	$	6,321,956

F-26

Table of Contents

The following table provides an aging of the loan portfolio by loan class at December 31, 2012:

	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		Greater than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans Receivable		Recorded Investment > 90 Days Accruing		Nonaccrual Loans

Commercial
Construction	$	-	$	-	$	1,581,031	$	1,581,031	$	54,110,362	$	55,691,393	$	-	$	1,581,031
Commercial Business		202,451		70,192		518,912		791,555		57,073,881		57,865,436		-		629,821
Commercial Real Estate		-		-		3,137,553		3,137,553		99,275,141		102,412,694		-		3,478,607
Mortgage Warehouse Lines		-		-		-		-		284,127,530		284,127,530		-		-

Residential Real Estate		320,729		34,975		-		355,704		10,541,603		10,897,307		-		134,193

Consumer
Loans to Individuals		49,243		-		139,852		189,095		9,454,290		9,643,385		84,948		54,904
Other		-		-		-		-		189,279		189,279		-		-

Deferred Loan Costs		-		-		-		-		987,086		987,086		-		-

Total	$	572,423	$	105,167	$	5,377,348	$	6,054,938	$	515,759,172	$	521,814,110	$	84,948	$	5,878,556

Additional income before taxes amounting to $398,756 and $362,399 would have been recognized in 2013 and 2012, respectively, if interest on all loans had been recorded based upon original contract terms.

Delinquencies and nonaccruals

Portfolio quality

Concentration of credit

Trends in volume of loans

Quality of collateral

Policy and procedures

Experience, ability, and depth of management

Economic trends – national and local

External factors – competition, legal and regulatory

F-27

Table of Contents

The following discusses the risk characteristics of each of our loan portfolio segments, commercial, mortgage warehouse lines of credit, and consumer.

Commercial

Mortgage Warehouse Lines of Credit

F-28

Table of Contents

Consumer

The Company considers the following credit quality indicators in assessing the risk in the loan portfolio:

Consumer credit scores

Internal credit risk grades

Loan-to-value ratios

Collateral

Collection experience

The Company’s internal credit risk grades are based on the definitions currently utilized by the banking regulatory agencies. The grades assigned and definitions are as follows, and loans graded excellent, above average, good and watch list are treated as “pass” for grading purposes:

1. Excellent - Loans that are based upon cash collateral held at the Bank and adequately margined. Loans that are based upon "blue chip" stocks listed on the major exchanges and adequately margined.

F-29

Table of Contents

2. Above Average - Loans to companies whose balance sheets show excellent liquidity and long-term debt is on well-spread schedules of repayment easily covered by cash flow. Such companies have been consistently profitable and have diversification in their product lines or sources of revenue. The continuation of profitable operations for the foreseeable future is likely. Management is comprised of a mix of ages, experience, and backgrounds and management succession is in place. Sources of raw materials are abundant, and for service companies, the source of revenue is abundant. Future needs have been planned for. Character and ability of individuals or company principals are excellent. Loans to individuals supported by high net worths and liquid assets.

3. Good - Loans to companies whose balance sheets show good liquidity and cash flow adequate to meet maturities of long-term debt with a comfortable margin. Such companies have established profitable records over a number of years, and there has been growth in net worth. Operating ratios are in line with those of the industry, and expenses are in proper relationship to the volume of business done and the profits achieved. Management is well-balanced and competent in their responsibilities. Economic environment is favorable; however, competition is strong. The prospects for growth are good. Loans in this category do not meet the collateral requirements of loans in categories 1 and 2 above. Loans to individuals supported by good net worths but whose supporting assets are illiquid.

3w. Watch List - Included in this category are loans evidencing problems identified by Bank management that require closer supervision. Such problem has not developed to the point which requires a Special Mention rating. This category also covers situations where the Bank does not have adequate current information upon which credit quality can be determined. The account officer has the obligation to correct these deficiencies within 30 days from the time of notification.

4. Special Mention - Loans or borrowing relationships that require more than the usual amount of attention by Bank management. Industry conditions may be adverse or weak. The borrower's ability to meet current payment schedules may be questionable, even though interest and principal are being paid as agreed. Heavy reliance has been placed on the collateral. Profits, if any, are interspersed with losses. Management is “one man” or incompetent or there is no plan for management succession. Expectations of a loan loss are not immediate; however, if present trends continue, a loan loss could be expected.

5. Substandard - Loans in this category possess weaknesses that jeopardize the ultimate collection of total outstandings. These weaknesses require close supervision by Bank management. Current financial statements are unavailable and the loan is inadequately protected by the collateral pledged. This category will normally include loans that have been classified as substandard by the regulators.

6. Doubtful - Loans with the same weaknesses inherent in the substandard classification and where collection or liquidation in full is highly questionable. It is likely that the loan will not be collected in full and the Bank will suffer some loss which is not quantifiable at the time of review.

7. Loss - Loans considered uncollectable and of such little value that their continuance as an active asset is not warranted. Loans in this category should immediately be eliminated from the Bank's loan loss reserve. Any accrued interest should immediately be backed out of income.

The following table provides a breakdown of the loan portfolio by credit quality indictor at December 31, 2013.

Commercial Credit Exposure - By Internally Assigned Grade	Construction		Commercial Business		Commercial Real Estate		Mortgage Warehouse Lines		Residential Real Estate

Grade:
Pass	$	47,539,033	$	79,832,704	$	68,620,450	$	116,951,357	$	12,635,067
Special Mention		-		1,406,143		19,396,574		-		1,129,111
Substandard		3,463,139		792,057		10,372,706		-		-
Doubtful		-		258,486		-		-		-
Loss		-		58,665		-				-
Total	$	51,002,172	$	82,348,055	$	98,389,730	$	116,951,357	$	13,764,178

Consumer Credit Exposure - By Payment Activity	Loans To Individuals		Other

Performing	$	9,674,011	$	170,526
Nonperforming		92,103		-
Total	$	9,766,114	$	170,526

F-30

Table of Contents

The following table provides a breakdown of the loan portfolio by credit quality indictor at December 31, 2012.

Commercial Credit Exposure - By Internally Assigned Grade	Construction		Commercial Business		Commercial Real Estate		Mortgage Warehouse Lines		Residential Real Estate

Grade:
Pass	$	49,373,827	$	55,498,613	$	76,096,964	$	284,127,530	$	10,763,114
Special Mention		-		1,019,586		19,060,621		-		134,193
Substandard		5,777,494		1,064,799		7,255,109		-		-
Doubtful		540,072		282,438		-		-		-
Total	$	55,691,393	$	57,865,436	$	102,412,694	$	284,127,530	$	10,897,307

Consumer Credit Exposure - By Payment Activity	Loans To Individuals		Other

Performing	$	9,454,288	$	189,279
Nonperforming		189,097		-
Total	$	9,643,385	$	189,279

Impaired Loans Disclosures

Loans are considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is determined that the Company will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the loan contract, including scheduled interest payments. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, it is also considered to be impaired. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when: (1) the full collection of interest or principal becomes uncertain; or (2) they are contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments unless the loans are both well secured and in the process of collection.

The following tables summarize the distribution of the allowance for loan losses and loans receivable by loan class and impairment method at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

F-31

Table of Contents

Allowance for Loan Losses as of and for the year ended December 31,2013

							Commercial			Mortgage			Residential										Deferred		Total
	Construction			Commercial			Real Estate			Warehouse			Real Estate		Consumer			Other			Unallocated		Fees
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning Bal. - December 31, 2012	$	1,990,292		$	972,789		$	2,262,221		$	1,420,638		$	112,103	$	102,583		$	2,271		$	288,315	$	-	$	7,151,212
Provision charged to operations		(223,449	)		428,176			1,206,130			(835,881	)		52,570		58,176			(88	)		391,028				1,076,662
Loans charged off		(561,993	)		(141,356	)		(453,480	)		-			-		(51,910	)		-			-				(1,208,739	)
Recoveries of loans charged off		417			12,124			6,895			-			-		-			-			-				19,436
Ending Bal.- December 31, 2013	$	1,205,267		$	1,271,733		$	3,021,766		$	584,757		$	164,673	$	108,849		$	2,183		$	679,343	$	-	$	7,038,571

Ending Balance
Individually evaluated for impairment		-			293,692			1,490,169			-			-		-			-			-		-		1,783,861
Collectively evaluated for impairment		1,205,267			978,041			1,531,597			584,757			164,673		108,849			2,183			679,343		-		5,254,710

Loans receivables:
Ending Balance	$	51,002,172		$	82,348,055		$	98,389,730		$	116,951,357		$	13,764,178	$	9,766,114		$	170,526		$	-	$	943,950	$	373,336,082
Individually evaluated for impairment		19,930			776,101			9,130,605			-			162,012		92,103			-			-		-		10,180,751
Collectively evaluated for impairment		50,982,242			81,571,954			89,259,125			116,951,357			13,602166		9,674,011			170,526			0		943,950		363,155,331

Allowance for Loan Losses as of and for the year ended December 31,2012

							Commercial			Mortgage		Residential												Deferred		Total
	Construction			Commercial			Real Estate			Warehouse		Real Estate			Consumer			Other			Unallocated			Fees
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning Bal. - December 31, 2011	$	1,054,695		$	934,642		$	1,597,702		$	1,122,056	$	91,076		$	187,352		$	2,377		$	544,550		$	-	$	5,534,450
Provision charged to operations		989,844			191,897			775,199			298,582		151,721			(6,911	)		5,895			(256,235	)		-		2,149,992
Loans charged off		(57,650	)		(165,026	)		(110,862	)		-		(130,694	)		(77,858	)		(6,001	)		-			-		(548,091	)
Recoveries of loans charged off		3,403			11,276			182			-		-			-						-			-		14,861
Ending Bal. – December 31, 2012	$	1,990,292		$	972,789		$	2,262,221		$	1,420,638	$	112,103		$	102,583		$	2,271		$	288,315		$	-	$	7,151,212

Ending Balance
Individually evaluated for impairment		569,579			253,598			447,193			-		21,693			-			-			-			-		1,292,063
Collectively evaluated for impairment		1,420,713			719,191			1,815,028			1,420,638		90,410			102,583			2,271			288,315			-		5,859,149

Loans receivables:
Ending Balance	$	55,691,393		$	57,865,436		$	102,412,694		$	284,127,530	$	10,897,307		$	9,643,385		$	189,279			-		$	987,086	$	521,814,110
Individually evaluated for impairment		2,842,031			906,526			3,952,546			-		134,193			54,904			-			-			-		7,890,200
Collectively evaluated for impairment		52,849,362			56,958,910			98,460,148			284,127,530		10,763,114			9,588,481			189,279			-			987,086		513,923,910

When a loan is identified as impaired, the measurement of impairment is based on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, except when the sole remaining source of repayment for the loan is the liquidation of the collateral. In such cases, the current fair value of the collateral less selling costs is used. If the value of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, the impairment is recognized through an allowance estimate or a charge to the allowance.

F-32

Table of Contents

Impaired Loans Receivables (By Class) - December 31, 2013
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Year to Date 2013 Average Recorded Investment		Year to Date 2013 Interest Income Recognized

With no related allowance:

Commercial
Construction	$	19,930	$	19,930		-	$	965,268	$	33,946
Commercial Business		243,840		400,297		-		258,139		5,094
Commercial Real Estate		-		-		-		1,032,115		-
Mortgage Warehouse Lines		-		-		-		-		-
Subtotal		263,770		420,227		-		2,255,522		39,040

Residential Real Estate		162,012		162,012		-		117,746		-

Consumer
Loans to Individuals		92,103		92,103		-		34,292		-
Other		-		-		-		-		-
Subtotal		92,103		92,103		-		34,292		-

Subtotal with no related allowance		517,885		674,342		-		2,407,560		39,040

With an allowance:

Commercial
Construction		-		-		-		246,853		-
Commercial Business		532,261		532,261		293,692		562,346		9,728
Commercial Real Estate		9,130,605		9,130,605		1,490,169		5,546,690		247,277
Mortgage Warehouse Lines		-		-		-		-		-
Subtotal		9,662,866		9,662,866		1,783,861		6,355,889		257,005

Residential Real Estate		-		-		-		44,196		-

Consumer
Loans to Individuals		-		-		-		4,238		-
Other		-		-		-		-		-
Subtotal		-		-		-		4,238		-

Subtotal with an allowance		9,662,866		9,662,866		1,783,861		6,404,323		257,005


Total:
Construction		19,930		19,930		-		1,212,121		33,946
Commercial Business		776,101		932,558		293,692		820,485		14,822
Commercial Real Estate		9,130,605		9,130,605		1,490,169		6,578,805		247,277
Mortgage Warehouse Lines		-		-		-		-		-
Residential Real Estate		162,012		162,012		-		161,942		-
Consumer		92,103		92,103		-		38,530		-
Total	$	10,180,751	$	10,337,208	$	1,783,861	$	8,811,883	$	296,045

F-33

Table of Contents

Impaired Loans Receivables (By Class) - December 31, 2012
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Year to Date 2012 Average Recorded Investment		Year to Date 2012 Interest Income Recognized

With no related allowance:

Commercial
Construction	$	1,360,914	$	1,360,914		-	$	412,716		-
Commercial Business		387,950		430,632		-		474,839		9,490
Commercial Real Estate		-		-		-		321,743		-
Mortgage Warehouse Lines		-		-		-		-		-
Subtotal		1,748,864		1,791,546		-		1,209,298		9,490

Residential Real Estate		-		-		-		23,600		0

Consumer
Loans to Individuals		54,904		54,904		-		54,904		-
Other		-		-		-		-		-
Subtotal		54,904		54,904		-		54,904		-

Subtotal with no related allowance		1,803,768		1,846,450		-		1,287,802		-

With an allowance:

Commercial
Construction		1,481,117		1,481,117		569,579		123,426		-
Commercial Business		518,576		663,403		253,598		456,541		15,746
Commercial Real Estate		3,952,546		3,999,032		447,193		2,964,744		29,291
Mortgage Warehouse Lines		-		-		-		-		-
Subtotal		5,952,239		6,143,552		1,270,370		3,544,711		45,037

Residential Real Estate		134,193		134,193		21,693		287,395		-

Consumer
Loans to Individuals		-		-		-		-		-
Other		-		-		-		-		-
Subtotal		-		-		-		-		-

Subtotal with an allowance		6,086,432		6,277,745		1,292,063		3,832,106		45,037


Total:
Construction		2,842,031		2,842,031		569,579		536,142		-
Commercial Business		906,526		1,094,035		253,598		931,380		25,236
Commercial Real Estate		3,952,546		3,999,032		447,193		3,286,487		29,291
Mortgage Warehouse Lines		-		-		-		-		-
Residential Real Estate		134,193		134,193		21,693		310,995		-
Consumer		54,904		54,904		-		54,904		-
Total	$	7,890,200	$	8,124,195	$	1,292,063	$	5,119,908	$	54,527

F-34

Table of Contents

In the normal course of business, the Bank may consider modifying loan terms for various reasons. These reasons may include as a retention strategy to compete in the current interest rate environment or to re-amortize or extend a loan term to better match the loan’s payment stream with the borrower’s cash flow. A modified loan would be considered to be a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) if the Bank grants a concession to a borrower and has determined that the borrower is troubled (i.e., experiencing financial difficulties).

If the Bank restructures a loan to a troubled borrower, the loan terms (i.e. interest rate, payment, amortization period, maturity date) may be modified in various ways to enable the borrower to cover the modified debt service payments based on current financials and cash flow adequacy. If a borrower’s hardship is thought to be temporary, then modified terms may only be offered for that time period. Where possible, the Bank would attempt to obtain additional collateral and/or secondary payment sources at the time of the restructure in order to put the Bank in the best possible position if the borrower is not able to meet the modified terms. The Bank will not offer modified terms if it believes that modifying the loan terms will only delay an inevitable permanent default.

In evaluating whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring, applicable guidance requires that a creditor must separately conclude that the restructuring constitutes a concession and the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties. The following table is a breakdown of troubled debt restructurings, all of which are classified as impaired, which occurred during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

During 2013

	Number of Contracts		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
Troubled Debt Restructurings:
Commercial Real Estate		1	$	371,834	$	367,034

During 2012

	Number of Contracts		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
Troubled Debt Restructurings:
Commercial		2	$	137,028	$	86,794
Commercial Real Estate		1		1,278,362		1,261,000

F-35

Table of Contents

The following is a summary of troubled debt restructurings that subsequently defaulted within twelve months of restructuring during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:

During 2013

	Number of Contracts	Recorded Investment
Troubled Debt Restructurings
that subsequently defaulted:	None

During 2012

	Number of Contracts	Recorded Investment
Troubled Debt Restructurings
that subsequently defaulted:
Commercial	2	$	82,113

If the Bank determines that a borrower has suffered deterioration in their financial condition, a restructuring of the loan terms may occur. Such loan restructurings may include, but are not limited to, reductions in principal or interest, reductions in interest rates, and extensions of the maturity date. When modifications are implemented, such loans meet the definition of a troubled debt restructuring. All of the modifications employed by the Bank during 2013 and 2012 have resulted in lower amortization payments for a limited time period without any reduction in the interest rate. The lower payments are determined by an analysis of the borrower’s cash flow ability to meet the modified terms while anticipating an improved financial condition to enable a resumption of the original payment terms.

5. Loans to Related Parties

Activity related to loans to directors, executive officers and their affiliated interests during 2013 and 2012 is as follows:

	December 31,
	2013		2012
Balance, beginning of year	$	3,256,734	$	3,077,361
Loans granted		244,198		412,581
Repayments of loans		(1,914,141)		(233,208)

Balance, end of year	$	1,586,791	$	3,256,734

All such loans were made under customary terms and conditions and were current as to principal and interest payments as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.

F-36

Table of Contents

6. Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment consist of the following:

		December 31,
	Estimated Useful Lives	2013			2012
Land		$	1,797,528		$	1,797,528
Building	40 Years		7,272,293			7,272,293
Leasehold improvements	10 Years		4,127,626			4,016,113
Furniture and equipment	3 – 15 Years		3,851,500			3,745,340
			17,048,947			16,831,274
Less: Accumulated depreciation			(7,005,442	)		(6,200,979	)
		$	10,043,505		$	10,630,295

Depreciation expense was $803,252 and $904,658 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

7. Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”)

The Bank held three properties valued at $2,136,341 at December 31, 2013 and six properties valued at $8,332,601 at December 31, 2012. The Company incurred impairment write-downs of $758,625 and $2,345,267 on OREO property during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Further declines in real estate values may result in increased foreclosed real estate expense in the future. Routine holding costs are charged to expense as incurred and improvements to real estate owned that enhance the value of the real estate are capitalized. Net OREO expenses, including impairment write-downs and sales gains and losses, amounted to $352,927 and $3,553,779 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and are included in other operating expenses.

8. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill and intangible assets are included in other assets and are summarized as follows:

	2013		2012
Goodwill	$	3,764,314	$	3,764,314
Core deposits intangible		1,125,261		1,393,228
Total	$	4,889,575	$	5,157,542

Amortization expense of intangible assets was $267,967 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Scheduled amortization of the core deposits intangible is as follows:

2014	$	258,054
2015		231,255
2016		231,255
2017		231,255
2018		173,442

	$	1,125,261

F-37

Table of Contents

9. Deposits

Deposits consist of the following:

	2013		2012
Demand
Non-interest bearing	$	121,891,752	$	152,334,759
Interest bearing		200,737,912		211,475,765
Savings		180,002,971		202,261,035
Time		135,919,395		141,617,916
	$	638,552,030	$	707,689,475

At December 31, 2013, time deposits have contractual maturities as follows:

Year	Amount
2014	$	68,243,871
2015		36,221,632
2016		14,403,422
2017		10,444,467
2018		6,606,003
	$	135,919,395

Individual time deposits in amounts of $100,000 or greater amounted to $72,166,380 and $72,248,706 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. As of December 31, 2013, time certificates of deposit in amounts of $100,000 or more have remaining maturities as follows:

Maturity Range	Amount
Three months or less	$	10,237,908
Over three months through six months		14,215,637
Over six months through twelve months		12,948,213
Over twelve months		34,764,622
	$	72,166,380

10. Borrowings

The balance of borrowings was $10,000,000 at December 31, 2013, consisting of a long-term FHLB advance of $10,000,000. The balance of borrowings was $42,400,000 at December 31, 2012, consisting of a long-term FHLB advance of $10,000,000 and overnight funds purchased of $32,400,000.

The Bank has established a borrowing relationship with the FHLB which further supports and enhances liquidity. During 2010, the FHLB replaced its Overnight Line of Credit and One-Month Overnight Repricing Line of Credit facilities available to member banks with a fully secured line of up to 50 percent of a bank’s quarter-end total assets. Under the terms of this facility, the Bank’s total credit exposure to FHLB cannot exceed 50 percent, or $371,162,543, of its total assets at December 31, 2013. In addition, the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Bank’s advances, letters of credit, the dollar amount of the FHLB’s minimum collateral requirement for off balance sheet financial contracts and advance commitments cannot exceed 30 percent of the Bank’s total assets, unless the Bank obtains approval from FHLB’s Board of Directors or its Executive Committee. These limits are further restricted by a member bank’s ability to provide eligible collateral to support its obligations to FHLB as well as a member bank’s ability to meet the FHLB’s stock requirement. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Bank had collateral at FHLB-NY to support additional borrowing of $76,255,003 and $61,358,015, respectively. The Bank also maintains an unsecured federal funds line of $20,000,000 with a correspondent bank that will expire on June 30, 2014, at which time it will be subject to review and renewal.

F-38

Table of Contents

The Bank has one ten-year fixed rate convertible advances from the FHLB. This advance, in the amount of $10,000,000 bears interest at the rate of 4.08%. This advance is convertible quarterly at the option of the FHLB and is fully secured by marketable securities. The FHLB advance matures on July 31, 2016. Due to the call provision, expected maturity could differ from contractual maturity. The $32,400,000 in overnight funds purchased at December 31, 2012, had an interest rate of 0.31% and matured on January 2, 2013.

11. Redeemable Subordinated Debentures

On May 30, 2006, the Company established 1st Constitution Capital Trust II, a Delaware business trust and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Trust II”), for the sole purpose of issuing $18 million of trust preferred securities (the “Capital Securities”). Trust II utilized the $18 million proceeds along with $557,000 invested in Trust II by the Company to purchase $18,557,000 of floating rate junior subordinated debentures issued by the Company and due to mature on June 15, 2036. The subordinated debentures carry a floating interest rate based on the three-month LIBOR plus 165 basis points (1.89285% at December 31, 2013). The Capital Securities were issued in connection with a pooled offering involving approximately 50 other financial institution holding companies. All of the Capital Securities were sold to a single pooling vehicle. The floating rate junior subordinated debentures are the only asset of Trust II and have terms that mirrored the Capital Securities. These debentures are redeemable in whole or in part prior to maturity after June 15, 2011. Trust II is obligated to distribute all proceeds of a redemption of these debentures, whether voluntary or upon maturity, to holders of the Capital Securities. The Company’s obligation with respect to the Capital Securities and the debentures, when taken together, provided a full and unconditional guarantee on a subordinated basis by the Company of the obligations of Trust II to pay amounts when due on the Capital Securities. Interest payments on the floating rate junior subordinated debentures flow through Trust II to the pooling vehicle.

F-39

Table of Contents

12. Income Taxes

The components of income tax expense (benefit) are summarized as follows:

	2013		2012
Federal-
Current	$	655,751	$	3,089,047
Deferred		1,205,078		(1,415,505	)
		1,860,829		1,673,542
State-
Current		144,702		675,260
Deferred		279,831		(376,837	)
		424,533		298,423
	$	2,285,362	$	1,971,965

A comparison of income tax expense at the Federal statutory rate in 2013 and 2012 to the Company’s provision for income taxes is as follows:

	2013			2012

Federal income tax	$	2,742,253		$	2,391,039
Add (deduct) effect of:
State income taxes net of federal income tax effect		280,192			196,959
Tax-exempt interest income		(751,164	)		(570,292	)
Bank-owned life insurance		(155,403	)		(152,158	)
Other items, net		169,484			106,417
Provision for income taxes	$	2,285,362		$	1,971,965

The tax effects of existing temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are as follows:

	2013			2012
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
Write-downs and expenses of OREO	$	100,044		$	1,443,644
Allowance for loan losses		2,811,205			2,856,194
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale		1,060,098			(571,763	)
SERP Liability		1,823,427			1,737,663
Other than temporary impairment loss		170,321			170,321
Depreciation		172,840			334,896
Nonaccrual interest		159,263			144,742
Pension liability		(11,721	)		65,493
Other		110,963			145,512
Net deferred tax assets	$	6,396,440		$	6,326,702

Based upon the current facts, management has determined that it is more likely than not that there will be sufficient taxable income in future years to realize the deferred tax assets. However, there can be no assurances about the level of future earnings.

13. Comprehensive Income and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income is the total of (1) net income and (2) all other changes in equity from non-shareholder sources, which are referred to as other comprehensive income. The components of other comprehensive income, and the related tax effects, are as follows:

F-40

Table of Contents

Year ended December 31, 2013:
	Before-Tax Amount			Income Tax Effect			Net-of-Tax Amount
Unrealized holding (losses) gains on available for sale securities:
Unrealized holding (losses) on available for sale securities	$	(2,992,624	)	$	1,060,098		$	(1,932,526	)
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) realized in income		--			--			--
Other comprehensive (loss) on available for sale securities		(2,992,624	)		1,060,098			(1,932,526	)

Unrealized impairment loss on held to maturity security:
Unrealized impairment (loss) on held to maturity security		(500,944	)		170,321			(330,623	)

Unfunded pension liability:
Changes from plan actuarial gains and losses included in other comprehensive income		27,236			(11,721	)		15,515

Total other comprehensive (loss)	$	(3,466,332	)	$	1,218,698		$	(2,247,634	)


Year ended December 31, 2012:
	Before-Tax Amount			Income Tax Effect			Net-of-Tax Amount
Unrealized holding (losses) gains on available for sale securities:
Unrealized holding (losses) gains on available for sale securities	$	1,806,967		$	(571,763	)	$	1,235,204
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) realized in income		--			--			--
Other comprehensive (loss) gain on available for sale Securities		1,806,967			(571,763	)		1,235,204

Unrealized impairment (loss) on held to maturity security:		(500,944	)		170,321			(330,623	)

Unfunded pension liability:
Changes from plan actuarial gains and losses included in other comprehensive income		(165,781	)		65,493			(100,288	)

Total other comprehensive gain (loss)	$	1,140,242		$	(335,949	)	$	804,293

F-41

Table of Contents

Changes in the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows and are presented net of tax:

	Unrealized Holding (Losses) Gains on Available for Sale Securities			Unrealized Impairment Loss On Held to Maturity Security			Unfunded Pension Liability			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance, January 1, 2012	$	1,530,078		$	(330,623	)	$	(107,993	)	$	1,091,462
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications		(294,874	)		-			7,705			(287,169	)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		-			-			-			-
Other comprehensive income (loss)		(294,874	)		-			7,705			(287,169	)
Balance, December 31, 2012		1,235,204			(330,623	)		(100,288	)		804,293
Other comprehensive income (loss) before Reclassifications		(3,167,730	)		-			115,803			(3,051,927	)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		-			-			-			-
Other comprehensive income (loss)		(3,167,730	)		-			115,803			(3,051,927	)
Balance, December 31, 2013	$	(1,932,526	)	$	(330,623	)	$	15,515		$	(2,247,634	)

14. Benefit Plans

Retirement Savings Plan

The Bank has a 401(K) plan which covers substantially all employees with six months or more of service. The plan permits all eligible employees to make basic contributions to the plan up to the IRS salary deferral limit. Under the plan, the Bank provided a matching contribution of 50% in 2013 and 2012 up to 6% of base compensation. Employer contributions to the plan amounted to $229,464 in 2013 and $204,918 in 2012.

Benefit Plans

The Company also provides retirement benefits to certain employees under supplemental executive retirement plans. The plans are unfunded and the Company accrues actuarial determined benefit costs over the estimated service period of the employees in the plans. The present value of the benefits accrued under these plans as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 is approximately $4,538,179 and $4,517,757, respectively, and is included in other liabilities and accumulated other comprehensive income in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Compensation expense of $213,438and $568,215 is included in the accompanying consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

In connection with the benefit plans, the Bank has life insurance policies on the lives of its executives, directors and divisional officers. The Bank is the owner and beneficiary of the policies. The cash surrender values of the policies total approximately $15.5 million and $15.0 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

F-42

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the changes in benefit obligations of the Company’s supplemental executive retirement plan.

	2013		2012
Change in Benefit Obligation
Liability for pension, beginning	$	4,517,757	$	3,952,450
Service cost		273,676		247,293
Interest cost		199,200		200,290
Actuarial (gain) loss		(452,454)		117,724
Benefits paid		-		-
Liability for pension, ending	$	4,538,179	$	4,517,757


Amount Recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets
Liability for pension	$	(4,538,179)	$	(4,517,757)
Net actuarial gain included in accumulated other comprehensive income		(27,236)		157,336
Prior service cost included in accumulated other comprehensive income		-		8,445
Net recognized pension liability	$	(4,565,415)	$	(4,351,977	)

Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets
Projected benefit obligation	$	4,538,179	$	4,517,757
Accumulated benefit obligation		4,211,047		3,380,461

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost	2013		2012
Service cost	$	273,676	$	247,293
Interest cost		199,200		200,290
Amortization of prior service cost		(267,883)		99,432
Recognized net actuarial gain		8,445		21,201
Net periodic benefit expense	$	213,438	$	568,216

The net periodic benefit cost for the year ended December 31, 2014 is projected to be $407,313.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, actuarial (gains) of $(19,943) is expected to be removed from accumulated other comprehensive income and recognized as a component of net periodic benefit expense.

Weighted-Average Assumptions, December 31	2013			2012
Discount Rate		4.9	%		6.00	%
Salary Scale		4.0	%		4.00	%

Projected Annual Benefit Payments*
2014	$	730,141
2015	$	3,906,536
2016	$	-
2017	$	873,279
2018	$	-
2019-2022	$	-

* Represents management’s expectation as of December 31, 2013 as to when such payments will be made.

F-43

Table of Contents

15. Share-Based Compensation

The Company’s stock-based incentive plans (the “Stock Plans”) authorize the issuance of an aggregate of 440,701 shares of the Company’s common stock (as adjusted for stock dividends) pursuant to awards that may be granted in the form of stock options to purchase common stock (“Options”) and awards of shares of common stock (“Stock Awards”). The purpose of the Stock Plans is to attract and retain personnel for positions of substantial responsibility and to provide additional incentive to certain officers, directors, employees and other persons to promote the success of the Company. Under the Stock Plans, options have a term of ten years after the date of grant, subject to earlier termination in certain circumstances. Options are granted with an exercise price at the then fair market value of the Company’s common stock. The grant date fair value is calculated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. As of December 31, 2013, there were 393,466 shares of common stock available for future grants under the Stock Plans, of which 343,540 shares are available for future grant under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan and 49,926 shares are available for future grant under the 2006 Directors Stock Plan.

Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options was $101,330 and $99,152 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Transactions under the Company’s stock option plans during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 are summarized as follows:

Stock Options	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2012		206,751			$9.20
Granted		28,007			6.11
Exercised		(9,040	)		7.43
Forfeited		-			-
Expired		(3,824	)		7.95
Outstanding at December 31, 2012		221,894			8.91		6.2	$	193,917
Granted		25,305			8.06
Exercised		(11,601	)		8.86
Forfeited		-			-
Expired		-			-
Outstanding at December 31, 2013		235,598			$8.81		5.6	$	623,916

Exercisable at December 31, 2013		174,965			$9.44		4.8	$	381,551

The total intrinsic value (market value on date of exercise less grant price) of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $27,826 and $16,122, respectively.

The following table summarizes stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2013:

	Outstanding Options						Exercisable Options
Exercise Price Range	Number		Average Life in Years		Average Exercise Price		Number		Average Life in Years		Average Exercise Price
$5.92 to $6.21		62,000		7.9	$	6.15		31,598		7.8	$	6.16
$6.79 to $10.75		110,080		6.5	$	8.06		79,849		5.7	$	8.14
$11.51 to $13.77		63,518		2.1	$	12.70		63,518		2.1	$	12.70
		235,598		5.6	$	8.81		174,965		4.8	$	9.44

F-44

Table of Contents

The fair value of each option and the significant weighted average assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the options granted during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:

	January 2013	January 2012
Fair value of options granted	$2.69	$2.20
Risk-free rate of return	0.81%	0.84%
Expected option life in years	7	7
Expected volatility	30.82%	31.48%
Expected dividends (1)	-	-

(1) To date, the Company has not paid cash dividends on its common stock.

As of December 31, 2013, there was approximately $124,889 of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock option-based compensation arrangements granted under the Company’s stock incentive plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over the next four years.

The following table summarizes nonvested restricted shares for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 (as adjusted to reflect the 5% stock dividend declared in December 2012 and the 5% stock dividend declared in December 2011):

Non-vested Shares	Number of Shares			Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Non-vested at January 1, 2012		159,341		$	6.54
Granted		47,034			8.73
Vested		(65,800	)		8.38
Forfeited		-			-
Non-vested at December 31, 2012		140,575			6.41
Granted		45,093			9.75
Vested		(49,178	)		8.97
Forfeited		-			-
Non-vested at December 31, 2013		136,490		$	6.59

The value of restricted shares is based upon the closing price of the common stock on the date of grant. The shares generally vest over a four year service period with compensation expense recognized on a straight-line basis.

Stock based compensation expense related to stock grants was $399,866 and $375,606 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

As of December 31, 2013, there was approximately $851,159 of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock grants that will be recognized over the next three years.

16. Commitments and Contingencies

As of December 31, 2013, future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:

2014	$	948,922
2015		807,645
2016		754,435
2017		750,057
2018		594,576
Thereafter		1,701,268
	$	5,556,903

F-45

Table of Contents

Rent expense aggregated $1,151,243 and $1,303,584 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Commitments With Off-Balance Sheet Risk

The consolidated balance sheet does not reflect various commitments relating to financial instruments which are used in the normal course of business. Management does not anticipate that the settlement of those financial instruments will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position. These instruments include commitments to extend credit and letters of credit. These financial instruments carry various degrees of credit risk, which is defined as the possibility that a loss may occur from the failure of another party to perform according to the terms of the contract. As these off-balance sheet financial instruments have essentially the same credit risk involved in extending loans, the Bank generally uses the same credit and collateral policies in making these commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet investments. Additionally, as some commitments and conditional obligations are expected to expire without being drawn or returned, the contractual amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

Commitments to extend credit are legally binding loan commitments with set expiration dates. They are intended to be disbursed, subject to certain conditions, upon request of the borrower. The Bank receives a fee for providing a commitment. The Bank was committed to advance $328,167,129 and $160,459,141 to its borrowers as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

The Bank issues financial standby letters of credit that are within the scope of ASC Topic 460, “Guarantees.” These are irrevocable undertakings by the Bank to guarantee payment of a specified financial obligation. Most of the Bank’s financial standby letters of credit arise in connection with lending relationships and have terms of one year or less. The maximum potential future payments the Bank could be required to make under these standby letters of credit amounted to $2,212,009 at December 31, 2013 and $1,620,362 at December 31, 2012. The current amount of the liability as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 for guarantors under standby letters of credit is not material.

The Bank also enters into forward contracts to sell residential mortgage loans it has closed (loans held for sale) or that it expects to close (commitments to originate loans held for sale). These contracts are used to reduce the Bank’s market price risk during the period from the commitment date to the sale date. The notional amount of the Bank’s forward sales contracts was approximately $23.7 million at December 31, 2013 and $36.0 million at December 31, 2012. Changes in fair value of the forward sales contracts, and the related loan origination commitments and closed loans, were not significant at December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Litigation

The Company may, in the ordinary course of business, become a party to litigation involving collection matters, contract claims and other legal proceedings relating to the conduct of its business. The Company may also have various commitments and contingent liabilities which are not reflected in the accompanying consolidated statement of condition. Management is not aware of any present legal proceedings or contingent liabilities and commitments that would have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

F-46

Table of Contents

17. Other Operating Expenses

The components of other operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:

	2013		2012

Marketing	$	294,663	$	185,738
Equipment		884,092		862,765
Telephone		364,059		351,183
Regulatory, professional and other consulting fees		1,104,037		726,556
Amortization of intangible assets		267,966		267,967
Other expenses		1,412,459		1,295,440
	$	4,327,276	$	3,689,649

18. Regulatory Requirements

The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal and state banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Bank’s and the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s and the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s and the Bank’s capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I capital to average assets (as defined). As of December 31, 2013, the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

To be categorized as adequately capitalized, the Company and the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table. As of December 31, 2013, the Bank's capital ratios exceed the regulatory standards for well-capitalized institutions. Certain bank regulatory limitations exist on the availability of the Bank’s assets for the payment of dividends by the Bank without prior approval of bank regulatory authorities.

F-47

Table of Contents

Actual capital amounts and ratios for the Company and the Bank as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:

											To Be Well Capitalized
											Under Prompt
						For Capital					Corrective
	Actual					Adequacy Purposes					Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
As of December 31, 2013
Company
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets	$	89,532,373		19.29	%	$	37,123,200		>8	%		N/A		N/A
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets		83,716,373		18.04	%		18,561,600		>4	%		N/A		N/A
Tier I Capital to Average Assets		83,716,373		10.89	%		30,757,840		>4	%		N/A		N/A
Bank
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets	$	87,253,384		18.80	%	$	37,123,200		>8	%	$	46,404,000		>10	%
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets		81,437,384		17.55	%		18,561,600		>4	%		27,842,400		>6	%
Tier I Capital to Average Assets		81,437,384		10.59	%		30,757,840		>4	%		38,447,300		>5	%

As of December 31, 2012
Company
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets	$	81,213,909		12.98	%	$	50,044,960		>8	%		N/A		N/A
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets		74,062,697		11.84	%		25,022,480		>4	%		N/A		N/A
Tier I Capital to Average Assets		74,062,697		9.29	%		31,881,576		>4	%		N/A		N/A
Bank
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets	$	78,621,740		12.57	%	$	50,044,960		>8	%	$	62,556,200		>10	%
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets		71,470,528		11.43	%		25,022,480		>4	%		37,533,720		>6	%
Tier I Capital to Average Assets		71,470,528		9.05	%		31,604,458		>4	%		39,505,573		>5	%

Dividend payments by the Bank to the Company are subject to the New Jersey Banking Act of 1948 (the “Banking Act”) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (the “FDIA”). Under the Banking Act and the FDIA, the Bank may not pay any dividends if after paying the dividend, it would be undercapitalized under applicable capital requirements. In addition to these explicit limitations, the federal regulatory agencies are authorized to prohibit a banking subsidiary or bank holding company from engaging in an unsafe or unsound banking practice. Depending upon the circumstances, the agencies could take the position that paying a dividend would constitute an unsafe or unsound banking practice.

In the event the Company defers payments on the junior subordinated debentures used to fund payments to be made pursuant to the terms of the Capital Securities, the Company would be unable to pay cash dividends on its common stock until the deferred payments are made.

19. Shareholders’ Equity

During the third quarter of 2012, the Company launched a shareholders’ common stock rights offering, which expired on October 5, 2012. The Company received gross proceeds of $5.0 million from holders of subscription rights who exercised their basic subscription rights and from holders who exercised the over-subscription privilege. The rights offering was fully subscribed. Accordingly, the Company issued a total of 555,555 shares of common stock at $9.00 per share to the holders of subscription rights who validly exercised their subscription rights, including pursuant to the exercise of the over-subscription privilege.

F-48

Table of Contents

The new warrants qualify and are accounted for as permanent equity on the Company’s balance sheet.

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has issued a supervisory letter to bank holding companies that contains guidance on when the board of directors of a bank holding company should eliminate or defer or severely limit dividends including for example when net income available for shareholders for the past four quarters net of previously paid dividends paid during that period is not sufficient to fully fund the dividends. The letter also contains guidance on the redemption of stock by bank holding companies which urges bank holding companies to advise the Federal Reserve of any such redemption or repurchase of common stock for cash or other value which results in the net reduction of a bank holding company’s capital at the beginning of the quarter below the capital outstanding at the end of the quarter.

In July 2005, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a common stock repurchase program that allows for the repurchase of a limited number of the company’s shares at management’s discretion on the open market. The Company undertook this repurchase program in order to increase shareholder value. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company repurchased 12,355 shares for an aggregate price of approximately $110,797. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company repurchased 2,337 shares for an aggregate price of approximately $20,916.

20. Fair Value Disclosures

U.S. GAAP has established a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1:

Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2:

Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3:

Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported with little or no market activity).

An asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below. These valuation methodologies were applied to all of the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities carried at fair value.

In general, fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. If such quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed models that primarily use, as inputs, observable market-based parameters. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These adjustments may include amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality and counterparty creditworthiness, among other things, as well as unobservable parameters. Any such valuation adjustments are applied consistently over time. The Company’s valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective value or reflective of future values. While management believes the Company’s valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.

F-49

Table of Contents

Securities Available for Sale. Securities classified as available for sale are reported at fair value utilizing Level 1 and Level 2 inputs. For Level 2 securities, the fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayments speeds, credit information and the security’s terms and conditions, among other things.

Impaired loans. Loans included in the following table are those which the Company has measured and recognized impairment generally based on the fair value of the loan’s collateral. Fair value is generally determined based upon independent third party appraisals of the properties, or discounted cash flows based on the expected proceeds. These assets are included as Level 3 fair values, based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements. The fair value consists of the loan balances less specific valuation allowances.

Other Real Estate Owned. Foreclosed properties are adjusted to fair value less estimated selling costs at the time of foreclosure in preparation for transfer from portfolio loans to other real estate owned (“OREO”), establishing a new accounting basis. The Company subsequently adjusts the fair value on the OREO utilizing Level 3 inputs on a non-recurring basis to reflect partial write-downs based on the observable market price, current appraised value of the asset or other estimates of fair value.

F-50

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:

	Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs		Total Fair Value
December 31, 2013:
Securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasury Securities and obligations of U.S. Government sponsored corporations (“GSE”) and agencies	$	19,994,430	$	1,515,270	$	-	$	21,509,700
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations GSE		-		3,681,792		-		3,681,792
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations – non GSE		-		2,826,396		-		2,826,396
Residential mortgage backed securities - GSE		-		31,965,947		-		31,965,947
Obligations of State and Political subdivisions		-		19,646,044		-		19,464,044
Trust preferred debt securities - single issuer		-		2,013,100		-		2,013,100
Corporate debt securities		-		16,517,728		-		16,517,728
Restricted stock		-		1,013,100		-		1,013,100
Mutual fund		-		25,000		-		25,000

December 31, 2012:
Securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasury Securities and obligations of U.S. Government sponsored corporations (“GSE”) and agencies	$	27,923,670	$	1,571,865	$	-	$	29,495,535
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations GSE		-		6,632,665		-		6,632,665
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations – non GSE		-		3,924,182		-		3,924,182
Residential mortgage backed securities - GSE		-		26,489,335		-		26,489,335
Obligations of State and Political subdivisions		-		20,682,301		-		20,682,301
Trust preferred debt securities - single issuer		-		1,998,366		-		1,998,366
Corporate debt securities		-		18,100,281		-		18,100,281
Restricted stock		-		2,493,300		-		2,493,300
Mutual fund		-		25,000		-		25,000

Certain financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). Financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:

	Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs		Total Fair Value
December 31, 2013:
Impaired loans		-		-	$	7,879,005	$	7,879,005
Other real estate owned		-		-		209,937		209,937

December 31, 2012:
Impaired loans		-		-	$	4,794,369	$	4,794,369
Other real estate owned		-		-		6,568,781		6,568,781

Impaired loans, measured at fair value and included in the above table, consisted of 17 loans having an aggregate balance of $10,088,648 and specific loan loss allowances of $1,783,861 at December 31, 2013 and 16 loans having an aggregate balance of $6,086,432 and specific loan loss allowances of $1,292,063 at December 31, 2012.

F-51

Table of Contents

The following table presents additional qualitative information about assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value:

	Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
	Fair Value Estimate	Valuation Techniques	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)
December 31, 2013

Impaired loans	$7,879,005	Appraisal of collateral (1)	Appraisal adjustments (2)	5-15% (8.8%)

Other real estate owned	$209,937	Appraisal of collateral (1)	Appraisal adjustments (2)	5-45% (21.7%)

December 31, 2012

Impaired loans	$4,794,369	Appraisal of collateral (1)	Appraisal adjustments (2)	5-15% (9.7%)

Other real estate owned	$6,568,781	Appraisal of collateral (1)	Appraisal adjustments (2)	10-50% (32.6%)

(1)

Fair value is generally determined through independent appraisals of the underlying collateral, which generally include various Level 3 inputs that are not identifiable.

(2)

Includes qualitative adjustments by management and estimated liquidation expenses.

The fair values of other real estate owned was determined using appraisals, which may be discounted based on management’s review and changes in market conditions.

The following is a summary of fair value versus the carrying value of all the Company’s financial instruments. For the Company and the Bank, as for most financial institutions, the bulk of its assets and liabilities are considered financial instruments. Many of the financial instruments lack an available trading market as characterized by a willing buyer and willing seller engaging in an exchange transaction. Therefore, significant estimations and present value calculations were used for the purpose of this note. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect these estimates.

Estimated fair values have been determined by using the best available data and an estimation methodology suitable for each category of financial instruments as follows:

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Accrued Interest Receivable and Accrued Interest Payable (Carried at Cost). The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents, accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable approximate fair value.

Securities Held to Maturity (Carried at Amortized Cost). The fair values of securities held to maturity are determined in the same manner as for securities available for sale.

Loans Held For Sale (Carried at Lower of Aggregated Cost or Fair Value). The fair values of loans held for sale are determined, when possible, using quoted secondary market prices. If no such quoted market prices exist, fair values are determined using quoted prices for similar loans, adjusted for the specific attributes of the loans.

F-52

Table of Contents

Gross Loans Receivable (Carried at Cost). The fair values of loans, excluding impaired loans subject to specific loss reserves, are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using market rates at the balance sheet date that reflect the credit and interest rate-risk inherent in the loans. Projected future cash flows are calculated based upon contractual maturity or call dates, projected repayments and prepayments of principal. Generally, for variable rate loans that re-price frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values.

Deposit Liabilities (Carried at Cost). The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and non-interest demand and savings accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered in the market on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.

Borrowings and Subordinated Debentures (Carried at Cost). The carrying amounts of short-term borrowings approximate their fair values. The fair values of long-term FHLB advances and subordinated debentures are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on quoted or estimated interest rates for new borrowings with similar credit risk characteristics, terms and remaining maturity.

F-53

Table of Contents

The estimated fair values, and the recorded book balances, at December 31, 2013 were as follows:

December 31, 2013
	Carrying Value			Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs			Level 3 Inputs		Fair Value

Cash and cash equivalents	$	69,278,771		$	69,278,771		-			-	$	69,278,771
Securities available for sale		99,198,807			19,994,430		79,204,377			-		99,198,807
Securities held to maturity		152,816,815			-		153,629,773			-		153,629,773
Loans held for sale		10,923,689			-		10,924,000			-		10,924,000
Loans		366,297,511			-		-			372,548,000		372,548,000
Accrued interest receivable		2,542,602			-		2,542,602			-		2,542,602
Deposits		(638,552,030	)		-		(639,539,000	)		-		(639,539,000	)
Borrowings		(10,000,000	)		-		(11,148,000	)		-		(11,148,000	)
Redeemable subordinated debentures		(18,557,000	)		-		(18,557,000	)		-		(18,557,000	)
Accrued interest payable		(883,212	)		-		(883,212	)		-		(883,212	)

December 31, 2012
	Carrying Value			Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs			Level 3 Inputs		Fair Value

Cash and cash equivalents	$	14,044,921		$	14,044,921		-			-	$	14,044,921
Securities available for sale		109,840,965			27,923,670		81,917,295			-		109,840,965
Securities held to maturity		116,027,900			-		121,839,363			-		121,839,363
Loans held for sale		35,960,262			-		35,960,262			-		35,960,262
Loans		514,662,898			-		-			515,577,788		515,577,788
Accrued interest receivable		2,872,099			-		2,872,099			-		2,872,099
Deposits		(707,689,475	)		-		(709,678,000	)		-		(709,678,000	)
Borrowings		(42,400,000	)		-		(43,906,000	)		-		(43,906,000	)
Redeemable subordinated debentures		(18,557,000	)		-		(18,557,000	)		-		(18,557,000	)
Accrued interest payable		(1,057,779	)		-		(1,057,779	)		-		(1,057,779	)

Loan commitments and standby letters of credit as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 are based on fees charged for similar agreements; accordingly, the estimated fair value of loan commitments and standby letters of credit is nominal.

F-54

Table of Contents

21. Condensed Financial Statements of 1st Constitution Bancorp (Parent Company Only)

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

	December 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
Assets:
Cash	$	55,409	$	271,638
Investment securities available for sale		557,000		557,000
Investment in subsidiaries		84,079,325		80,461,566
Other assets		2,223,580		2,320,328
Total Assets	$	86,915,314	$	83,610,532

Liabilities And Shareholders’ Equity
Subordinated debentures	$	18,557,000	$	18,557,000
Shareholders’ equity		68,358,314		65,053,532
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	86,915,314	$	83,610,532

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

	Year ended December 31,
	2013			2012
Income:
Interest	$	11,464		$	14,541
Total Income		11,464			14,541

Expense:
Interest		362,961			397,920
Total Expense		362,961			397,920

Loss before income taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries		(351,497	)		(383,379	)
Federal income tax benefit		(120,188	)		(131,232	)

Loss before equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries		(231,309	)		(252,147	)
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries		6,011,397			5,312,651
Net Income		5,780,088			5,060,504
Equity in other comprehensive loss of subsidiaries		(3,051,927)			(287,169)
Comprehensive Income	$	2,728,161		$	4,773,335

F-55

Table of Contents

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Year ended December 31,
	2013			2012
Operating Activities:
Net Income	$	5,780,088		$	5,060,504
Adjustments:
Decrease (increase) in other assets		96,748			(134,972	)
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries		(6,011,397	)		(5,312,651	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(134,561	)		(387,119	)

Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Investment in subsidiary		(574,213	)		(5,181,472	)
Net cash (used in) investing activities		(574,213	)		(5,181,472	)

Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Issuance of common stock, net		603,342			5,303,840
Purchase of treasury stock		(110,797	)		(122,570	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		492,545			5,181,470

Net (decrease) in cash		(216,229	)		(387,321	)
Cash at beginning of year		271,638			658,959
Cash at end of year	$	55,409		$	271,638

F-56

Table of Contents

22. Unaudited Quarterly Financial Data

The following sets forth a condensed summary of the Company’s quarterly results of operations:

	2013
	Dec. 31		Sept. 30		June 30		March 31
Summary of Operations
Interest income	$	6,999,053	$	7,338,854	$	7,182,252	$	7,471,838
Interest expense		1,011,952		1,033,832		1,061,623		1,147,482
Net interest income		5,987,101		6,305,022		6,120,629		6,324,356
Provision for loan losses		299,998		539,998		236,666		0
Net interest income after provision
for loan losses		5,687,103		5,765,024		5,883,963		6,324,356
Non-interest income		1,154,274		1,616,548		1,447,859		1,608,563
Non-interest expense		4,923,489		5,253,483		5,162,300		6,082,968
Income before income taxes		1,917,888		2,128,089		2,169,522		1,849,951
Income taxes		543,386		604,851		612,492		524,633
Net income	$	1,374,502	$	1,523,238	$	1,557,030	$	1,325,318

Net income per common share :
Basic	$	0.24	$	0.25	$	0.26	$	0.22
Diluted	$	0.23	$	0.25	$	0.25	$	0.22

	2012
	Dec. 31		Sept. 30		June 30		March 31
Summary of Operations
Interest income	$	8,408,534	$	8,486,646	$	7,907,189	$	8,034,267
Interest expense		1,225,923		1,242,244		1,279,267		1,403,708
Net interest income		7,182,611		7,244,402		6,627,922		6,630,559
Provision for loan losses		499,998		499,998		549,998		559,998
Net interest income after provision
For loan losses		6,682,613		6,744,404		6,077,924		6,030,561
Non-interest income		1,597,670		1,316,727		1,187,966		1,165,165
Non-interest expense		6,600,896		6,183,174		5,373,974		5,612,517
Income before income taxes		1,679,387		1,877,957		1,891,916		1,583,209
Income taxes		438,642		523,038		593,808		416,477
Net income	$	1,240,745	$	1,354,919	$	1,298,108	$	1,666,732

Net income per common share :
Basic	$	0.21	$	0.25	$	0.24	$	0.22
Diluted	$	0.20	$	0.25	$	0.24	$	0.22

23. Subsequent Event

On February 7, 2014 at 3:30 p.m. (the “Effective Time”), the Company and the Bank closed on the merger of Rumson-Fair Haven Bank and Trust Company, a New Jersey state commercial bank (“RFHB”), with and into the Bank, with the Bank continuing as the surviving entity (the “2014 Merger”), pursuant to the terms and conditions of that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated August 14, 2013 and as amended on September 19, 2013 (the “Merger Agreement”), by and between the Company, the Bank and RFHB.

Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, at the Effective Time, each share of RFHB common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time was converted into and became the right to receive, at the election of the holder, either 0.7772 shares of common stock of the Company, $7.50 in cash or a combination of cash and shares of common stock of the Company, subject to proration as described in the Merger Agreement, so that 60% of the aggregate merger consideration consisted of cash and 40% consisted of shares of common stock of the Company. Cash was paid in lieu of fractional shares. In the aggregate, the Company paid approximately $14,770,000 in cash and issued 1,019,242 shares of common stock of the Company as 2014 Merger consideration to RFHB shareholders. Included in the cash and stock consideration amounts were a total of $98,919 that was used to cash out outstanding options to acquire shares of RFHB common stock and 5,829 shares of common stock of the Company that were issued in exchange for restricted stock awards for RFHB common stock. Cash used as consideration in the 2014 Merger was provided by the Bank from existing cash assets.

F-57

Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2013, RFHB had approximately $230 million in assets, approximately $149 million in loans and approximately $200 million in deposits. RFHB operated five offices in Monmouth County, New Jersey which became branches of the Bank as a result of the 2014 Merger. The 2014 Merger will be accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting as prescribed by “ASC” 805 “Business Combinations”, as amended. Under this method of accounting, the purchase price will be allocated to the respective assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values, net of applicable income tax effects. The excess cost over fair value of net assets acquired will be recorded as goodwill. The financial information regarding RFHB is unaudited and is subject to adjustment.

The pro forma net interest income and non-interest income of the combined banks for the year ended December 31, 2013 as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2013 (the first day of the Company’s 2013 fiscal year) is approximately $37.8 million. The pro forma assets, loans and deposits of the combined banks as of December 31, 2013 as if the acquisition had occurred on December 31, 2013 is as follows: approximately $972.6 million in assets, approximately $513.9 million in loans and approximately $838.9 million in deposits. As indicated above, the financial information regarding RFHB is unaudited and is subject to adjustment. The pro forma net interest income and non-interest income is not indicative of the future net interest income and non-interest income of the combined banks, and the pro forma assets, loans and deposits are not indicative of the future assets, loans and deposits of the combined banks. Due to the limited time since the completion of the 2014 Merger, the remaining disclosures for this business combination are incomplete as of March 31, 2014. As such, it is impracticable for the Company to include pro forma earnings and the purchase price allocation.

F-58

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	1st CONSTITUTION BANCORP


Date: March 31, 2014	By:	/s/ ROBERT F. MANGANO
		Robert F. Mangano
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Capacity	Date
/s/ ROBERT F. MANGANO	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director	March 31, 2014
Robert F. Mangano /s/ CHARLES S. CROW, III	(Principal Executive Officer) Chairman of the Board	March 31, 2014
Charles S. Crow, III /s/ DAVID C. REED	Director	March 31, 2014
David C. Reed /s/ WILLIAM M. RUE	Director	March 31, 2014
William M. Rue /s/ FRANK E. WALSH, III	Director	March 31, 2014
Frank E. Walsh, III /s/ JOHN P. COSTAS	Director	March 31, 2014
John P. Costas /s/ JOSEPH M. REARDON	Senior Vice President and Treasurer	March 31, 2014
Joseph M. Reardon	(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.			Description

3	(i)(A)		Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (conformed copy) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i)(A) to the Company’s Form 10-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on March 27, 2009)

3	(i)(B)		Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation increasing the number of shares designated as Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on December 23, 2008)

3	(i)(C)		Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation establishing the terms of the Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on December 23, 2008)

3	(ii)(A)		Bylaws of the Company (conformed copy) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii)(A) to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on October 22, 2007)

4.1			Specimen Share of Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 10-KSB (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on March 22, 2002)

4.2			Rights Agreement, dated as of March 18, 2004, between 1st Constitution Bancorp and Registrar and Transfer Company, as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Form 8-A12G (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on March 18, 2004)

4.3			Subscription Agent Agreement, dated as of September 5, 2012, between 1st Constitution Bancorp and Registrar and Transfer Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 6, 2012)

4.4			Warrant, dated November 23, 2011, to purchase shares of 1st Constitution Bancorp common stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to 1st Constitution’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 22, 2013)

4.5			Warrant, dated November 23, 2011, to purchase shares of 1st Constitution Bancorp common stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to 1st Constitution’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 22, 2013)

10.1		#	1st Constitution Bancorp Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated as of October 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-QSB (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on November 13, 2002)

10.2		#	Amended and Restated 1st Constitution Bancorp Directors’ Insurance Plan, effective as of June 16, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10 to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on March 24, 2006)

10.3		#	1st Constitution Bancorp Form of Executive Life Insurance Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 10-QSB (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on November 13, 2002)

10.4		#	2000 Employee Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 6.3 to the Company’s Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on June 15, 2001)

Table of Contents

Exhibit No.		Description

10.5	#	Directors Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 6.4 to the Company’s Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on June 15, 2001)

10.6	#	Amendment No. 1 to 1st Constitution Bancorp Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, effective January 1, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Form 10-Q (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on August 11, 2004)

10.7	#	Change of Control Agreement, effective as of April 1, 2004, by and between the Company and Joseph M. Reardon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s Form 10-Q (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on August 11, 2004)

10.8	#	Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 1st Constitution Bancorp Employee Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on December 22, 2004)

10.9	#	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the 1st Constitution Bancorp Employee Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on December 22, 2004)

10.10	#	The 1st Constitution Bancorp 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A of the Company's proxy statement (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on April 15, 2005)

10.11	#	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the 1st Constitution Bancorp 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Form 10-Q (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on August 8, 2005)

10.12	#	Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the 1st Constitution Bancorp 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Form 10-Q (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on August 8, 2005)

10.13	#	Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under the 1st Constitution Bancorp 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Form 10-Q (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on August 8, 2005)

10.14	#	1st Constitution Bancorp 2006 Directors Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on May 19, 2006)

10.15	#	Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the 1st Constitution Bancorp 2006 Directors Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on May 19, 2006)

10.16	#	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the 1st Constitution Bancorp 2006 Directors Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on May 19, 2006)

Table of Contents

Exhibit No.		Description

10.17		Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of 1st Constitution Capital Trust II, dated as of June 15, 2006, among 1st Constitution Bancorp, as sponsor, the Delaware and institutional trustee named therein, and the administrators named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on June 16, 2006)

10.18		Indenture, dated as of June 15, 2006, between 1st Constitution Bancorp, as issuer, and the trustee named therein, relating to the Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Debt Securities due 2036 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on June 16, 2006)

10.19		Guarantee Agreement, dated as of June 15, 2006, between 1st Constitution Bancorp and the guarantee trustee named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on June 16, 2006)

10.20	#	Amendment No. 2 to 1st Constitution Bancorp Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, effective as of December 31, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Company’s Form 10-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on April 15, 2008)

10.21	#	1st Constitution Bancorp 2005 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, effective as of January 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on December 28, 2006)

10.22	#	Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Robert F. Mangano dated as of July 1, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 14, 2010)

10.23	#	1st Constitution Bancorp 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the Company's proxy statement filed with the SEC on April 11, 2014)

10.24		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 14, 2013, by and between 1st Constitution Bancorp, 1st Constitution Bank and Rumson-Fair Haven Bank & Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 15, 2013).

10.25		First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated September 19, 2013, by and among the Company, 1st Constitution Bank and Rumson-Fair Haven Bank & Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 12, 2013).

14		Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14 to the Company’s Form 10-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on March 25, 2004)

21	*	Subsidiaries of the Company

23.1	*	Consent of BDO USA LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

23.2	*	Consent of ParenteBeard LLC as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

31.1	*	Certification of the principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)

31.2	*	Certification of the principal financial officer of the Company, pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)

Table of Contents

Exhibit No.		Description

32	*	Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer of the Company

101.INS	*	XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

___________________________

* Filed herewith.

# Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.